Is this the man who will conclusively prove the 2020 election fraud? 🇺🇸💪🇺🇸
Google his name- Douglas Frank. Main stream media is attacking him everywhere.
Over the Target 🎯🔥🎯
(media.greatawakening.win)
✈️ OVER TARGET ✈️
I wouldn’t rely on a known liar to tell you anything.
He was part of the red team that confirmed the data Mike had was from the 2020 election which is what the 5 million reward was for, which the red team did in fact confirm. He then ran to the M$M with lies about how he didn’t confirm that China remotely connected to election machines, falsely claiming that’s why he didn’t get the 5 million.
He lied about Mike Lindell and stated that the physical attack on Mike during the symposium was not true. He wasn’t even in the room when it happened.
It’s a good thing Mike’s CI team sniffed him out before Mike dropped the PCAPs to the red team. Who knows what that lying fool had planned for them.
You are misinformed and misframed.
Lindell's symposium was to award "to disprove" the data, not "to prove". Packet logs are nearly impossible to prove and also nearly impossible to obtain unless you own or hacked equipment between src/dst to MITM it.
I've gone into great lengths on this on various parts of my thread and on this subject in prior (go back to the Symposium threads and you'll see). In order to prove this data is what he says it is requires so many lego pieces that it is infeasible for me without seeing how he's going to prove it.
The only reasonable easy proof I would be able to slam my fist down on a table would be if foreign actors backdoored the machines and used some commonly available remote desktop utility like Teamviewer that you'd actually be able to easily replay the stream showing them actually using that computer. Now that could be a possibility, Solar Winds was a thing, the Symposium was Lindell's shit or get off the pot for me on his data and he's still on the toilet.
According to Mike Lindell, what was to be disproven is that the data came from the 2020 election. I find that to mean confirmation but either term works for me.
Why did you insert that? Once again, according to Mike, his original request to the red team was to disprove the data he had was from the 2020 election. He showed them data (not the packet captures) and the red team agreed the data they saw was from the 2020 election thus no 5 million reward.
I couldn’t agree more, however that was not the challenge. Mike’s challenge was for the red team to disprove the data he showed the red team was from the 2020 election which they didn’t do.
I'll concede, Lindell had a lawyer do his ad up good:
https://frankspeech.com/content/mike-lindells-cyber-symposium-2021
He mentions the packet logs but doesn't consider that "cyber data". He hyped up all the 16 terabytes and yada. He's more of a faggot than I realize for that and I'm moving from "he may have just bought bunk goods" to "he's peddling bullshit". I will no longer even say that I appreciate his involvement in this campaign and will actively work to discredit him and his work.
Thank you!
I’m just glad that lying sack of shit Josh Merrit was denied access to the packet logs. I thank God that Mike cut access off to the data when he did.
You go ahead and try to discredit the truth all you want. Maybe politifact will hire you because their current “fact checks” against election fraud are a good laugh.
You are welcome and good luck!