Again, here is a copy of the Law of War manual for reference. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
To start you off, I posted this a few months ago and it explains how the Geneva Convention rules apply when there is a foreign occupation and how the United Nations could get involved if international rules were not followed. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9ZWTFC/hello-patriots-i-took-some-time-/
That post led to a conversation about the start date of the occupation. If we have to wait a year, when did it begin? Did it begin when he won the election, when the election was ratified or did it start on inauguration day? I think I found the answer.
If you look at 11.2.4 (page 749) in the Law of War Manual, it says "there is no specific legal requirement that the Occupying Power issue a proclamation of military occupation."
However, it also states "A proclamation may help fix the date of the beginning of the occupation. The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply. In particular, the proclamation may be used to advise inhabitants of changes to law, including penal law."
There it is! "The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply" What did Biden do on his first day in office (Jan 20th)? He signed 17 executive orders telling us the rules with which we must comply. When he signed the EO's, he changed the rules and that was his proclamation of occupation.
If we go to page 1073 section 18.9.3.1 we find " Grave Breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions"
Grave breaches of the GC are those involving any of the following acts, if committed against persons or property protected by the GC:
• willful killing;
• torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
• willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;
• unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person;
• compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
• willfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in the GC;
• taking of hostages; and
• extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
I think it is safe to say that Biden has broken most, if not ALL, of the rules established by the GC. The grave breaches will be used to prosecute him and anyone who participated in this belligerent occupation.
If we go to page 1126, section 18.23.5 "Conspiracy"
The term conspiracy is defined as the combination of minds in an unlawful purpose.
Page 1127, section 18.23.5.1 " Conspiracy to Commit Genocide"
The Genocide Convention provides that conspiracy to commit genocide shall be punishable. Thus, mere agreement by perpetrators to commit genocide may be punishable even if no preparatory act has taken place.
Page 1119, 18.22.3 Official Position Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him or her of responsibility under international law.
Page 1120, 18.22.4 Acting Pursuant to Orders Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to orders of his or her Government or of a superior does not relieve that person from responsibility under international law, provided it was possible in fact for that person to make a moral choice.
To summarize, just following orders will not be a defense, being a head of state will not be a defense and if you conspired with this plandemic, at any level, you will be held responsible and charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. I think Fauci will be the first arrest. "First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction." Q Imagine what will go through the minds of all these liberals when he gets charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. "What did he inject me with?"
How many world leaders will be arrested along with him. It is a conspiracy, "combination of minds in an unlawful purpose".
I think it will happen soon and the cabal knows its coming.
They tried to pass HR-1 in a gutted NASA bill yesterday, They are desperate, they are panicking. Enoy the show.
I have more, I will post it later.
Stay safe my frens!!
WWG1WGA!!!
DC is the seat of this belligerent occupation, owned by USA Inc. traitors beholden to the CCP.. Let them continue their patterns of behavior to their ultimate demise.
OK. I got that premise. But the OP's assertion is:
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9ZWTFC/hello-patriots-i-took-some-time-/
OP is asserting that there is some legal reason why one year must pass before .... certain actions can take place.
I don't see it.
Fwiw, I agree that a state of war exists (I agree by and large with PP devolution theory), and that it must be handled in different ways to regular war, and yes, let them continue to their ultimate demise. I'm even pen to the possibility that DC is "occupied" territory that is outside the US (open, but not convinced, as many parts of the Federal govt apparatus exist outside DC, don't they?), but I fail to see how the Law of War manual applies to any of this, or why 11.3 marker refers specifically to LoW 11.3
Thanks.
The entire 20th Century is fraught with wars that consumed the worlds resources, human and material, and the effort here is to be a better humanity. All this horror because of no restraints. This is what formed the LoW, this is what propagated the GC. DC is the focal point of the occupation by the CCP, and devolution has removed Continuity of Government to the hinterlands, so to speak. What remains are the willing and knowingly treasonous USA Inc board of directors. 1871 firmed up the corporation and 1913 weaponized the corporate Maritime laws..
The 11.3 marker is the END of occupation, i.e. removal of the belligerents..
OK. Thanks. I'm starting to form a better idea of the framework you are coming with. And, I'm actually kind of open to that. However, how does this 1 year thing work in in your framework. Some people, like the OP, are asserting that there is some legal reason (or lawful basis) why DC cannot be recovered and belligerents removed for "a period of one year".
The OP's assertion here is A) "it's the law" and not B) "well, one year is a reasonable time to let normies wake up" or whatever.
I'm curious as to where do you stand on that point.
This work that PDJT initiated with the admonishment that everything must be done by the book-i.e. the Constitution, LoW AND all treaties and agreements that the USA is a signatory to.. Just because you can't find what you are looking for means you are incapable of thinking outside the box and make foolish assumptions along the way.