WHAT in the GC prevents the US military from arresting or acting against the occupying force (biden, etc)? What constraints are there such that IF and WHEN GC no longer applies, the US military (White Hats) are now free to act without being open to accusation of war crimes, etc?
Also, if Biden is the Occupying power (as an agent of CCP China), they STILL have effective control of the territory, don't they? If not, when did it cease?
If Biden (CCP) took control of the USA, its government, institutions etc, covertly through an act of war (rigging the election), when did 'military operations' cease? Jan 20?
If so, isn't that when occupation began? So, doesn't that occupation still stand today?
Maybe we focused on the wrong portion, and this all hinges on Biden et al losing control, or at least the perception of having lost control to the outside observer, before moves can be made.
It explains Q's need for more people to be awake.
It explains why things happen behind the scenes, but nothing yet has been an overt signal that the end game of The Plan has arrived.
There's just too many variables to pin down what is actually happening and what's supposed to happen. And some of this was by design so it wouldn't be too easy for the enemy to discern.
I dunno. For me, I find the Devolution series very compelling and convincing, whereas the LoW theory just doesn't do it for me.
One interesting thing is that these two theories both overlap. I think some people see the overlap, and jump to the conclusion that the latter must be true because of x, y and z.
For me, the only real thing that eludes me (and I'm yet to see any concrete analysis in the way Patel Patriot works devolution) is the whole "cannot act for one year" theory. That things got more holes than a plastic sack of potatoes.
Other elements, well, they make lots of sense, and are supported by PP's analysis.
A) that we are at war B) that the regime is illegitimate C) that TIMING of action by the Good Guys is a factor, etc.
OK. Let's take this then.
WHAT in the GC prevents the US military from arresting or acting against the occupying force (biden, etc)? What constraints are there such that IF and WHEN GC no longer applies, the US military (White Hats) are now free to act without being open to accusation of war crimes, etc?
Also, if Biden is the Occupying power (as an agent of CCP China), they STILL have effective control of the territory, don't they? If not, when did it cease?
If Biden (CCP) took control of the USA, its government, institutions etc, covertly through an act of war (rigging the election), when did 'military operations' cease? Jan 20?
If so, isn't that when occupation began? So, doesn't that occupation still stand today?
Hey man, I was just showing you it did say it, after you asked where.
I haven't read enough of it for any of that context.
Danke, Panzer.
Just trying to generate discussion and actually work my way through this rather hot topic.
Maybe we focused on the wrong portion, and this all hinges on Biden et al losing control, or at least the perception of having lost control to the outside observer, before moves can be made.
It explains Q's need for more people to be awake.
It explains why things happen behind the scenes, but nothing yet has been an overt signal that the end game of The Plan has arrived.
There's just too many variables to pin down what is actually happening and what's supposed to happen. And some of this was by design so it wouldn't be too easy for the enemy to discern.
Hmmmm...
I dunno. For me, I find the Devolution series very compelling and convincing, whereas the LoW theory just doesn't do it for me.
One interesting thing is that these two theories both overlap. I think some people see the overlap, and jump to the conclusion that the latter must be true because of x, y and z.
For me, the only real thing that eludes me (and I'm yet to see any concrete analysis in the way Patel Patriot works devolution) is the whole "cannot act for one year" theory. That things got more holes than a plastic sack of potatoes.
Other elements, well, they make lots of sense, and are supported by PP's analysis.
A) that we are at war B) that the regime is illegitimate C) that TIMING of action by the Good Guys is a factor, etc.