-1
Panzershrekt -1 points ago +1 / -2

Israel is a giant, land-based aircraft carrier.

ETA: I guess some people need to understand the analogy better, and that it's more nuanced than just "joos bad." Who do you think still owns Israel? Yes, yes, "Rothschilds and Khazarians", but there's still a group above them.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't think it's the Fed or Wallstreet anymore.

Europe has been abusing offshore dollar markets by basically creating more dollars out of things air, hence the term "Eurodollar" They're IOUs basically, but up until Powell, the Fed has just gone along with it.

In a way, these have helped prop up City of London and the ECB's credit export business.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has to beFrance/Germany/UK who choose to leave NATO.

Likely to happen because Shultz has already floated the idea of a European Military in lieu of NATO after Trump won.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wonder if it was one of those Chinese models

2
Panzershrekt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Supreme Court isn't going to wanna deal with the fallout from doing that. Roberts was scared of riots for even hearing cases with far weaker consequences.

2
Panzershrekt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something tells me the DUMBs would have all kinds of sensors, and they'd detect this thing miles away and have plenty of time to prepare.

2
Panzershrekt 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's seems like wasting time. Sure Israel last and all that, pulling annual aid would fix that pretty quick.

If Flynn knows where the bodies are, shouldn't he be part of the demolition crew?

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just had a thought. What positions are left that Flynn could reasonably fill, and has he not been nominated for anything yet until they can guarantee he'll get in, recess appointment or otherwise?

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably not much. They'll say oh all those people are dead and we're not like them.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Others appear to be running scared, and yet mitch is doubling and tripling down.

I'd need direct confirmation from Q before I believe Mitch is part of anything that helps us, even playing a part in a movie.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish I had taken out that loan when it dropped to 10k.. gonna be kicking myself forever on that one.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Half the cabinet picks for a lot of Presidents haven't been relevant. We had a physicist and a president of Proctor & Gamble as Defense secretaries in the past

13
Panzershrekt 13 points ago +13 / -0

Hmm. So tap Gaetz as AG to expend their ammo, show the RINOs, show who is resigning. Have him withdrawn and appoint Flynn, and Gatez moves to the senate taking Rubio's seat, with a chance to become senate majority leader.

by raxlore
2
Panzershrekt 2 points ago +2 / -0

It might not. I'm just going by "scare event necessary." And, at least to me, a scare event under Trump seems counterproductive to waking people up about the swamp since Presidents usually shoulder the responsibility for things that happen, deserved or not.

But we also don't know what the scare event is or who it's supposed to scare. We just assume normies, when it could just as easily be the Gaetz appointment scaring the deepstate lol

by raxlore
3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean if we need a scare event it's gonna have to happen soon.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on who controls it, as with most things.

Would we be against something that was cheap, accessible, and had no way of being undermined or hijacked if it could indeed solve problems many people face?

If someone here were going deaf or blind, and this could reverse it, would we be against it? Modern medicine does save lives. The support Ivermectin has here is a testament to that. I believe modern medicine is a product of God, since it's a product of us, who ourselves are a product of him. That doesn't preclude it from being used for evil, let alone for good.

The trick is figuring out the safeguards while ensuring neither the government or companies can abuse any of it in any way.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

They haven't had to. Countries like India, which has straddled the line between East and West, were buying Russian oil at "friendly nation" prices, and selling it to Europe.

When Western leaders looked into putting a price cap on Russian oil, look at how many countries (including Japan) decided to ignore them, after Russia said it wouldn't sell to countries who enforced the price caps. Because the only way to enforce price controls like that is for countries to abide by them. Many didn't because they wanted the oil more.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very skeptical of this

Why be skeptical of it?

Suppose you entertain the idea that Ukraine was a hotbed of corruption and money laundering for many, not just top Ukrainian officials, then you might see why everyone was very upset about Trump's phone call with Zelensky (the 'very fine phone call'), where Trump asked him to look into Joe and Hunter's dealings Burisma dealings, and most notably the firing of a Ukrainian official looking into that very thing. Joe's famous quid-pro-quo moment.

Not only that but since the start of the Russian invasion, capital has been fleeing Europe. This is a very bad thing for a continent that doesn't produce anything and imports almost everything it needs to survive. For instance, It was a big deal when France was kicked out of Niger, where they happen to get most of the Uranium they use for their nuclear power.

Europe would benefit the most from WWIII because it would be the US fighting it, and since the US would be on a full-blown war footing, a lot of the capital that fled Europe would return to Europe seeing it being less of a risk.

It was more like the flagpole of the Kremlin

And that should tell you something. They have been trying everything to make Putin misstep in retaliation so that NATO finally has the lawful excuse it needs to go in. Think about that. All this BS the international community has raised over the situation, but the best it can do is send arms to Ukraine. Because they know they can't do anything. They talk a big game about Ukraine joining NATO, but no country can join NATO during things like ongoing border disputes.

There was always going to be a confrontation between NATO and Russia, Russia just decided to move the timetable up. It invaded Ukraine to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, and NATO can't do anything about it. Thus, all these things we've seen to make Putin overreact. They want him to launch a nuke, innocents be damned because they want/need this war.

view more: Next ›