4
Panzershrekt 4 points ago +4 / -0

It needs to be a real red wave, as in NO MORE RINOS

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that's why I'm bringing it up. Chris Hansen is the To Catch a Predator guy. So it was as if Hollywood was mocking us.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe it. But I think it's been an economic war so far.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean I was just parsing the first statement that there will be bank collapses. We very well could have more tit-for-tat bank collapses. By that, I mean Silvergate was a cabal bank, and that collapsed. I think that was us, based on how soon after FTX it collapsed. First Republic collapsed, and I think that was the cabal retaliation to Silvergate.

But I think the biggest bank collapse could be the ECB. So I see it as a statement and almost a warning. Keep pulling your shit and you will fall.

5
Panzershrekt 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, I think he's being direct.

I think he's addressing globalists here, and abroad, when he says there will be bank failures.

The European central bank, and really a lot of the other central banks, are pretty tied to our interest rates. Christine Lagarde and the ECB would love nothing more than to go back to zero or even negative interest rates. But they can't because of Powell. If the Fed stays at 4-7% for a long enough period of time, it could very well bankrupt the ECB because of "Eurodollars", which are pretty much just dollar futures. Tomorrow's money at yesterday's prices. I believe that the high interest rates are drying up the "Eurodollar market" which everyone else has used to fund a lot of their pet projects across the globe.

ETA: I don't know if Powell is Q aligned, or just a pawn, but I think he is part of the attack on the cabal either way. Trump appointed him for a reason, Powell had to play politics there for a bit while the Biden admin took a whole year to reconfirm him to Fed chair (echoing the inflation is transitory line). And in that time, the Biden admin tried to replace him with Lael Brainard. Trump is saying he would replace Powell if elected again, but I think that's disinfo to keep Powell disconnected from Trump and therefore safe in the position for the time being.

5
Panzershrekt 5 points ago +5 / -0

To me this is a two part comment. There will be bank failures / our banks will be fine.

The war on the ECB continues ;)

8
Panzershrekt 8 points ago +8 / -0

So soon after Zelensky firing Zaluzhny against her wishes? Oh my.

I'm now taking bets on how long before we see her hanging out in Kiev.

10
Panzershrekt 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because he retired and can say whatever he wants now.

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not, and they've proven capable of adapting to it by utilizing smaller combined arms platoons/battalions, drones, missiles, etc, after initially demilitarizing Ukraine though WWI-style trench/arty warfare.

NATO has been trying its damnedest to get Russia to take the bait so they can invoke Article 5. It hasn't worked so far, so I don't think Russia is gonna let them choose the line. I think our leaders are so hell-bent on this that I could see them falling for a feint that would result in an over-extension. And they'll be getting advice from politically appointed generals who just as likely have a 20th-century view on tactics. I can see Russia welcoming a war of attrition within 500km of its borders, where its military is a sledgehammer, artillery can still be effective, supply lines are short, and only having to outlast NATO until its depleted.

0
Panzershrekt 0 points ago +1 / -1

I believe the US is at the same stage as 1944 Germany in ww2 . Pretty advanced weaponry for the times, but unable to produce anything en masse due to complexity and supply chains. But with the added complication of workers.

Could we convert factories for wartime production like we did back then? Most of the young people can't even work a 40 hour week without complaining, so I can't imagine they'd be up to the challenge of war production, either. Then there's the issue that we apparently import some basic materials.

We may win a conventional war in 3 weeks with what we have, but it had better be decisive.

5
Panzershrekt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe Q should come back for that q & a...

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.

Some countries have begun to do this, after the NATO summit last year. Interesting.

3
Panzershrekt 3 points ago +3 / -0

We didn't deindustrialize Germany, they are doing it to themselves. Why? To change the economic landscape of Europe. Imagine for a moment, all other EU countries supporting a French and German military-industrial complex, with goals to build up a massive EU military and simultaneously wrest control of NATO from the US, and turn it into a global police force for the UN.

5
Panzershrekt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not dooming, but perhaps we should change the meme from two more weeks to two more elections lol

1
Panzershrekt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know why he'd have to play dumb considering some of the other topics he's been willing to cover. Perhaps it has something to do with returning to the US.

2
Panzershrekt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like fun to me, in the sense that if there was ever a precipice..

view more: Next ›