I have one of those obsessed, "highly educated", paranoid family members who constantly posts CV19 BS. I don't have the time to go through what she just posted, "30 bad arguments about CV19 vaccines" but I figure for those who have the time, I ask to please have at it with your rebuttal(s). Pick a "bad argument", add your sources, post to this thread, and away we go. Thanks everyone.
The article is too big to fully cut and paste, but here is the URL:
Propaganda is not science. Questioning is science. Dogma is anti-science.
All you need is one. Here are a bunch. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/15/study-finds-covid-vaccines-to-blame-for-98-percent-cases-myocarditis/
https://thelibertyloft.com/2021/12/10/97-8-percent-of-vaxxed-young-patients-suffering-myocarditis-received-mrna-shot-within-30-days-american-heart-association-study-finds/
https://rairfoundation.com/alert-japan-places-myocarditis-warning-on-vaccines-requires-informed-consent/
tennesseestar.com/2021/12/10/top-cardiologist-vaccine-induced-myocarditis-in-young-people-way-more-serious-than-covid-induced
Not worth it.
As a free man. No…
And there never needs to be an answer to: why not?
Engaging in argument, rebuttals and counterpoints is pointless after that.
Holy fuck I honestly can't believe people aren't ashamed to put this trash out in the world. Just looking at the first couple...
Yes, that's why everyone's biggest fear is falling. 680k people die every year from falling. So dangerous. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls
Are they really saying a 1/1000 chance of dying is high? Multiply any fraction by 9 billion and you get a large number.
The co part of that word literally means other things contributed. So it actually means they died of multiple conditions, not as a result of wuflu.
I can't read any more, why are websites publishing middle schoolers and why are adults using it as support for their dumb agendas.
Let’s see the long term test data on children born from vaccinated mothers.
Honestly. How is "vaccines are too new/rushed" not a good argument?
Remember 2009 with the H1N1 vaccines? No problems, right?!
Nah, man. It's called Narcolepsy. They got Narcolepsy, among other problems, from a rushed jab. And that's just one example.
HECK.
Thank you all for contributing. I'm not giving up on her.
Ask her if she uses Bayer aspirin, Tylenol or Advil and why. Because some have bad reaction to one so tries another. There is no 1-size-fits-all medicine.
As for 'science', if she gets sick would she want to be treated by someone who shoots up lab rats to see what happens or a medical doctor who tries to cure her with established and approved meds.
You dont have to be 'highly educated', all you need is common sense.
At times she appears to have zero common sense and critical thinking skills. Her degrees mean squat to me.
I see lots of emotion in those "rebuttals"
Got you on the first five:
To be clear, though, they are not swayed by logical arguments. Their arguments get peppered with statistics (flawed at that) but only to bolster an emotional argument.
Based on deliberately flawed tracking. The CDC itself admitted that it's number is about 20x overinflated. To now start injecting experimental shots into the entire population based on that premise is NOT SCIENTIFIC.
This is an error in understanding the magnitude of the population. 5.5 million people are said to have died "from" covid, but that equates to 0.007% of the world population. Heart disease and cancer alone kill almost 30 million people every year. 5.5 million is only a large number without context. That is NOT SCIENTIFIC.
Yes it does. People WITHOUT co-morbidities are at a significantly lower risk of dying from COVID. Ignoring that and making them inject experimental shots just because you want them to get vaxed is NOT SCIENTIFIC.
For the vast majority of people who contract it, it is no worse than the flu. This is ESPECIALLY true for children. Only 1-5% of people have severe symptoms. Around 15% have mild symptoms. Around 80% have NO symptoms. This is information that the public should be aware of so they can decide for themselves if the jab is for them or not. Also, Flu deaths have been (un)surprisingly flat for the last couple of years, while covid killed 5.5 million. We know that covid deaths are inflated by the CDC's own admission. One way they did this was by calling every respiratory illness "COVID" without a positive test (or any test). To most people it really is no worse than the flu, but since we can't trust your numbers I have to reject the premise of your argument.
Previously "millions" was the huge number, now it's "thousands." The risk to young healthy people is miniscule. And if they catch it and spread it to people at higher risk? When you can guarantee that the vaccine will 99.9% prevent infectoin, then maybe that's a good argument. But it doesn't and you can't quantify BY HOW MUCH the jab prevents infection and spread. To add to that, if the higher risk people are vaccinated, they should be protected, right? So either you know the vaccine doesn't work and you're evil, or you have blind faith in the vaccine and you're stupid.