Assuming an effective vaccine and an actual global pandemic, how would it not be in our best interest to prevent in other countries infection that could spread around the world, and back to us?
It's not really about letting them die off. It's about letting them either handle their own problems. If they can do that, you're right survival of the fittest. We should butt out, and let them roll the dice.
Because my God loves all, including those nameless tribal children. The powers of the world helped keep third world countries horrible places. HIV was probably man-made. Our pharmaceutical companies tested vaccines and drugs first on those voiceless people. Those tribal fights were encouraged by European powers. Yes, a lot of the problems are self-inflicted, but some are not.
Right, and neither is giving them unnecessary vaccines. The point being that if they care, you think they'd address those issues first.
Assuming an effective vaccine and an actual global pandemic, how would it not be in our best interest to prevent in other countries infection that could spread around the world, and back to us?
Unnecessary vaccines*
It's not really about letting them die off. It's about letting them either handle their own problems. If they can do that, you're right survival of the fittest. We should butt out, and let them roll the dice.
I'm sure that's exactly what Hillary Clinton tells herself when she has children abucted from the third-world for her demented sex slave network.
Those countries should be given the chance to roll the dice for themselves, and solve their own problems.
Because my God loves all, including those nameless tribal children. The powers of the world helped keep third world countries horrible places. HIV was probably man-made. Our pharmaceutical companies tested vaccines and drugs first on those voiceless people. Those tribal fights were encouraged by European powers. Yes, a lot of the problems are self-inflicted, but some are not.
Their parents would. AWTTWIS. (A word to the wise is sufficient)