I mean no disrespect to anyone either, but this is a random person on the internet with a random picture. Convincing stories - knows them, has story about San Diego etc etc - but I could post the same kind of picture and make the same kind of claims (I text with her mom all the time) very easily...arguments like "they aren't from around here so they don't know" always raise my antenna as well....
So, I will take this post/comments as a potential data point, but I do not buy for a quarter of a second that she was really shot. I give it even odds she was killed later or is still alive.
Edit - also - who benefits? Here we have a community of researchers largely convinced it was an obvious false flag...where better to try to get in a toehold of wedging doubt in?
Agreed. You have to assume every anonymous person you encounter on the internet is the enemy (I sometimes fail on that assumption). That being said: no reason to be disrespectful; try telling that to the chans, LOL.
I mean no disrespect to anyone either, but this is a random person on the internet with a random picture. Convincing stories - knows them, has story about San Diego etc etc - but I could post the same kind of picture and make the same kind of claims (I text with her mom all the time) very easily...arguments like "they aren't from around here so they don't know" always raise my antenna as well....
So, I will take this post/comments as a potential data point, but I do not buy for a quarter of a second that she was really shot. I give it even odds she was killed later or is still alive.
Edit - also - who benefits? Here we have a community of researchers largely convinced it was an obvious false flag...where better to try to get in a toehold of wedging doubt in?
Agreed. You have to assume every anonymous person you encounter on the internet is the enemy (I sometimes fail on that assumption). That being said: no reason to be disrespectful; try telling that to the chans, LOL.