Uh Oh: Democrats Didn’t Realize This Was Embedded in Maricopa County Ballots
(www.americanlibertyemail.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
Cyber Ninjas found out that when recounting all the votes (including the illegitimate votes), that Biden won Maricopa county. This was obviously going to happen, and shows little irregularities on behalf of the people counting the votes in November 2020.
What irregularities Cyber Ninjas did find for example was in descending order:
255,326 ballots included in the “final voted file” (the “VM55” file) as having voted early that were not included in the “early voting returns file” (the “EV33” file), when the EV33 file should have an entry for each early vote cast (whether by mail or in person) with the details as to when and how that vote was cast;
23,344 mail-in ballots cast when the registered voter had moved and where no one with the same surname remained at the address;
5,295 instances of multiple ballots from the same person;
3,432 more votes in the official results than in the final-voted (“VM55”) file;
2,592 more duplicate ballots than ballots sent for duplication;
1,528 voters who had moved to another state;
The difference in votes between Trump and Biden is 10,457. Add all the numbers above up and the total should be 291,517, a number that is much larger than the difference in votes, indicating irregularities.
And how many were invalidated by marking with a sharpie?
Another point as to why the Arizona election should be decertified.
I don't believe the Maricopa audit covered this. I am getting my numbers from this file: https://cdn.michaeljlindell.com/downloads/fix2020first/states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf (page 33-34/82 of the .pdf file). I could not find anything related to sharpies in the specific Cyber Ninja part of this document.
Curious how that got lost in this pile of malfeasance.
I wonder if during the original November 2020 counting, the vote counters were instructed to throw away all ballots marked with sharpies, instead of having the sharpie-ballots being stored separately but marked as ineligible. This could explain why they weren't taken into account as a factor of the Cyber Ninja audit
I haven't really looked into the sharpie aspect of the Arizona election particularly.
Really, how exactly have they all been debunked, and by whom exactly? No need to keep details from me, I want to see why you think so.
I wasn't aware those had been debunked. Who debunked them? Was there another audit? Or did someone just say they have been debunked and you believed them? That's embarrassing that you are so gullible.