Is Steineke’s unconstitutional claim based on the State Constitution of Wisconsin or the Constitution of the United States? Just because he says it is doesn’t make it so.
Bet he would be hard pressed to show where either constitution says decertifying a fraudulent election result is illegal. Think about it, he is claiming committing election fraud is protected by the constitution as long as the fraud is not detected or is denied long enough for the results to be certified. Anyone really believe that?
Is Steineke’s unconstitutional claim based on the State Constitution of Wisconsin or the Constitution of the United States? Just because he says it is doesn’t make it so.
Bet he would be hard pressed to show where either constitution says decertifying a fraudulent election result is illegal. Think about it, he is claiming committing election fraud is protected by the constitution as long as the fraud is not detected or is denied long enough for the results to be certified. Anyone really believe that?
6082662401 Jims office
VOTES MATTER - Scream in his ear
Seems like they are just going to run out the clock.
Also, we are passed a year and one day for Devolution/military.
CALL JIMS OFFICE TODAY I AM CALLING FROM MINNESOTA BUT STILL CALLING JIM!!!!
Wasn't there just a race decertified in another state? It was for a state politician I think .
It just goes to show you how many of them depend on cheating to get into office both Democrats and Republicans.
Another traitor comes out of the closet!
It's not solved this way in the first place.
This is the stuff that exposes the bad guys. Take note who needs to go next.
I'd saybits doing what n Its meant to-do.