a) He resigned when his objection to taking the diversity training was rejected
b) He attempted to sue NHS
c) NHS disagreed with him, labeling his views as "not worthy"
d) Judge ordered that the rejection by NHS was not good enough, and that the case can go forward
While Christianity is under attack, the NHS didn't dismiss the man (even though they coerced him in a way that caused him to quit) and the judge ruling he can sue them is a win, in my view.
Your headline misrepresents it a bit.
a) He resigned when his objection to taking the diversity training was rejected
b) He attempted to sue NHS
c) NHS disagreed with him, labeling his views as "not worthy"
d) Judge ordered that the rejection by NHS was not good enough, and that the case can go forward
While Christianity is under attack, the NHS didn't dismiss the man (even though they coerced him in a way that caused him to quit) and the judge ruling he can sue them is a win, in my view.