The suspicion people have about crypto being a trap I can understand but overall the idea the cabal needs to re-engineer the entire internet and network protocol to implement something they already have working is clearly illogical
Not sure what you mean by re-engineering internet and network protocol. Can you elaborate?
Dont get me wrong, Blockchains are great and we will definitely use it in future post-awakening. I cannot imagine a free system without a good blockchain based currency system. Just like Internet is great and can be used for freedom of information, but can also be subverted and hence it was allowed to enter the public realm.
Bitcoin as such is not viable as a currency for so many reasons (I have posted extensively about this, and I am happy to agree to disagree with anyone who really loves bitcoin). The Cabal knew it wont, and it was dangled in front of us as a bait because they knew they had to take us out of this fiat system into a central bank digital currency system - thats their end goal.
r/btc in the old days ... lames got inserted into the dev team to intentionally break the coin -- the whole segwit drama
You know I loved the idea of bitcoin in around 2011, even had a wallet that I lost (dont even want to think about how much I had in it) but over the years as it got hyped up by the media I lost interest. However I vaguely remember the dev controversy that I barely followed. Would definitely sit down on a weekend and dig through that stuff for fun.
blockchain as a network protocol
The real technology is "distributed computing" or "distributed consensus". I worked on it in late 90s and it was nothing new. What Bitcoin brought to the table was the "proof-of-work" - it was a brand new revolutionary method of reaching distributed consensus, which made blockchains feasible.
The networking protocol (both transport and routing protocols) has not changed due to bitcoin. TCP/IP has always been designed to scale in every possible topology, including peer-to-peer, just that there weren't a lot of peer-to-peer scenarios that made sense beyond streaming video files.
So deep state did not invent anything revolutionary in terms of networking protocols. They just created a new algorithm that made peer-to-peer record keeping feasible using existing protocols.
It's an entirely new architecture to connect & route network traffic & distribute data
Now you are describing something like Theta. Allowing every edge node to take part in storing and routing the data to make the internet truly peer-to-peer. We are headed there, but we are not there yet. This has nothing to do with bitcoin.
there's no engineering reason the cabal needs blockchain to lock the world into digital tyranny money
Blockchain was the call of the freedom they used to bait us and get sucked into the dreams of a digital currency. Cabal goes far out of their way to engineer a truck load of benign technologies just to take their control to the next level.
Take the Internet for example. It was a long game. Took them 30 years and offering ability for us to be free in information sharing in all possible ways, only to snap it all up and imprison our minds under the tyranny of Big Tech. If they didnt take this long path, it wouldn't have worked and they know it.
Same with BTC/Blockchain/Crypto. What they unleashed was just an algorithm, and a hint of a dream. Their final goal requires neither the algorithm nor the blockchain, but it doesnt matter, the detour was just 10 years plus some regulatory shenanigans.
Ah, okay I understand what you mean. Yes, as this technology keeps maturing, there will be revolutions in terms of underlying technologies on the Internet. Perhaps in future data-centers will be replaced by peer2peer distributed storage (it will probably take an innovation beyond a block chain for this to work) and I sure hope the concept of "cloud computing" - people storing their data on some Bit Tech computer will come to an end.
None of this is as revolutionary as when the same Elites allowed the Internet to enter the public realm for the first time. Our history has been littered with revolutionary communication technology - each one starting off with freedom for people, but always successfully subverted by the Elites. The reason for this is complex because the Elites are not a monolithic entity and they always plan on long term.
They always let technology grow however it does, but curb whatever developments they don't like. For instance, remember all those forums and chats in the early days of internet where small communities were thriving. FBI had infiltrated almost every one of those forums, and by disruption, and by enticing people to move to Big Tech (like discord, reddit etc) they pretty much destroyed those.
I am sure they plan to d the same with whatever new tech comes out of it. However, this time they were also expecting the complete enslavement to happen long before that - 2024 would have been the end of 2nd term under Killary and it would have all been over.
They could’ve gone from digital fiat --> CBDC
Digital fiat took a long time to get people used to, esp outside US. Up until Covid time, at the supermarket checkouts I would always see long lines in front of the cash counters. Jumping to CDBC requires couple of things. Absolute trust. Thats one reason. A lot of people don't even realise that CDBC is centralised. A lot of them will believe that whatever the CDBC that will be pushed forward "is like bitcoin".
Then there is also the timing. Bitcoin came out right after 2008 GFC and when people were waking up against Big Banks. This was exactly like the period between 1890s and 1913 when people were getting really angry with the banks, and they introduced Federal Reserve System as an entity to subdue the banks.
Having said all that, I wont rule out that Satoshi was an Anon. Its possible he released his paper purely on his own and developed Bitcoin on his own, but eventually deep state figured out how to use it to their advantage. However the more I think about the origins, the less I feel its likely.
Not sure what you mean by re-engineering internet and network protocol. Can you elaborate?
Dont get me wrong, Blockchains are great and we will definitely use it in future post-awakening. I cannot imagine a free system without a good blockchain based currency system. Just like Internet is great and can be used for freedom of information, but can also be subverted and hence it was allowed to enter the public realm.
Bitcoin as such is not viable as a currency for so many reasons (I have posted extensively about this, and I am happy to agree to disagree with anyone who really loves bitcoin). The Cabal knew it wont, and it was dangled in front of us as a bait because they knew they had to take us out of this fiat system into a central bank digital currency system - thats their end goal.
You know I loved the idea of bitcoin in around 2011, even had a wallet that I lost (dont even want to think about how much I had in it) but over the years as it got hyped up by the media I lost interest. However I vaguely remember the dev controversy that I barely followed. Would definitely sit down on a weekend and dig through that stuff for fun.
The real technology is "distributed computing" or "distributed consensus". I worked on it in late 90s and it was nothing new. What Bitcoin brought to the table was the "proof-of-work" - it was a brand new revolutionary method of reaching distributed consensus, which made blockchains feasible.
The networking protocol (both transport and routing protocols) has not changed due to bitcoin. TCP/IP has always been designed to scale in every possible topology, including peer-to-peer, just that there weren't a lot of peer-to-peer scenarios that made sense beyond streaming video files.
So deep state did not invent anything revolutionary in terms of networking protocols. They just created a new algorithm that made peer-to-peer record keeping feasible using existing protocols.
Now you are describing something like Theta. Allowing every edge node to take part in storing and routing the data to make the internet truly peer-to-peer. We are headed there, but we are not there yet. This has nothing to do with bitcoin.
Blockchain was the call of the freedom they used to bait us and get sucked into the dreams of a digital currency. Cabal goes far out of their way to engineer a truck load of benign technologies just to take their control to the next level.
Take the Internet for example. It was a long game. Took them 30 years and offering ability for us to be free in information sharing in all possible ways, only to snap it all up and imprison our minds under the tyranny of Big Tech. If they didnt take this long path, it wouldn't have worked and they know it.
Same with BTC/Blockchain/Crypto. What they unleashed was just an algorithm, and a hint of a dream. Their final goal requires neither the algorithm nor the blockchain, but it doesnt matter, the detour was just 10 years plus some regulatory shenanigans.
Ah, okay I understand what you mean. Yes, as this technology keeps maturing, there will be revolutions in terms of underlying technologies on the Internet. Perhaps in future data-centers will be replaced by peer2peer distributed storage (it will probably take an innovation beyond a block chain for this to work) and I sure hope the concept of "cloud computing" - people storing their data on some Bit Tech computer will come to an end.
None of this is as revolutionary as when the same Elites allowed the Internet to enter the public realm for the first time. Our history has been littered with revolutionary communication technology - each one starting off with freedom for people, but always successfully subverted by the Elites. The reason for this is complex because the Elites are not a monolithic entity and they always plan on long term.
They always let technology grow however it does, but curb whatever developments they don't like. For instance, remember all those forums and chats in the early days of internet where small communities were thriving. FBI had infiltrated almost every one of those forums, and by disruption, and by enticing people to move to Big Tech (like discord, reddit etc) they pretty much destroyed those.
I am sure they plan to d the same with whatever new tech comes out of it. However, this time they were also expecting the complete enslavement to happen long before that - 2024 would have been the end of 2nd term under Killary and it would have all been over.
Digital fiat took a long time to get people used to, esp outside US. Up until Covid time, at the supermarket checkouts I would always see long lines in front of the cash counters. Jumping to CDBC requires couple of things. Absolute trust. Thats one reason. A lot of people don't even realise that CDBC is centralised. A lot of them will believe that whatever the CDBC that will be pushed forward "is like bitcoin".
Then there is also the timing. Bitcoin came out right after 2008 GFC and when people were waking up against Big Banks. This was exactly like the period between 1890s and 1913 when people were getting really angry with the banks, and they introduced Federal Reserve System as an entity to subdue the banks.
Having said all that, I wont rule out that Satoshi was an Anon. Its possible he released his paper purely on his own and developed Bitcoin on his own, but eventually deep state figured out how to use it to their advantage. However the more I think about the origins, the less I feel its likely.