We have one of those "local" cable tv news stations, that pretty much parrots regional or national MSM (I watch for the weather forecast and some locally relevant news) in southern NY (NYC is location for rest of MSM broadcast on tv here). This morning, they reported on one of the Big Pharma companies coming out with a "vaccine" specifically for omicron,but stated boosters would be required in six months. I don't think I need to explain the ridiculousness of this on several levels for people here, but what I was amazed at was the straight face the reporter had in reporting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
That's precious.
In 6-months, Omicron will be completely replaced by some new variant. They've been trotting out new "variants" on a 4-month basis all last year.
Why get a "vaccine" for a variant that won't even be relevant by April? and then why plan on a booster in 6-months when there won't even be an Omicron anymore?
And how could they know their new "vaccine" will lose effectiveness in 6 months? (unless it is just a re-packaged version of what they are selling now, which they know became useless in less than 6 months when first rolled out)
Precisely.
They are just rebranding and repackaging at intervals they see fit.
Now you know why the jabs don't come with an ingredient list. Big Pharma doesn't want you to know they're using the same vaxx.
That is a great point.