but if we stay huddled in our houses doing nothing, always afraid of retaliation, we will never get anything done.
That is a strawman argument for this specific situation. I am certainly not arguing for doing nothing and suggesting otherwise is unsupported by anything I have said.
Also you're an ass if you don't think people can both question and approve of something.
Perhaps you should re read the context of what has been said thus far. You seem to be missing out on the inconsistency (done worrying about consequences, time to just take action) compared to the (who let them through) posts.
Are we rushing in charging like the light brigade, or are we strategically and tactically analyzing what is happening around us in context of whom are enemy is and what counter moves our actions or inaction open up to our opponent?
I'm simply asking for his perspective as I see these two responses to be internally inconsistent. I have not made any assertion that people cannot both support and question something. After all I both support and question what is happening in Canada.
It is odd to me that asking for his perspective and relating my observations is characteristic of being an ass in your book. Dare I say your assertion that I am saying something that isn't said is yet another strawman argument.
That is a strawman argument for this specific situation. I am certainly not arguing for doing nothing and suggesting otherwise is unsupported by anything I have said.
Perhaps you should re read the context of what has been said thus far. You seem to be missing out on the inconsistency (done worrying about consequences, time to just take action) compared to the (who let them through) posts.
Are we rushing in charging like the light brigade, or are we strategically and tactically analyzing what is happening around us in context of whom are enemy is and what counter moves our actions or inaction open up to our opponent?
I'm simply asking for his perspective as I see these two responses to be internally inconsistent. I have not made any assertion that people cannot both support and question something. After all I both support and question what is happening in Canada.
It is odd to me that asking for his perspective and relating my observations is characteristic of being an ass in your book. Dare I say your assertion that I am saying something that isn't said is yet another strawman argument.