The apostle John begins the Revelation with these words: "The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto Him, to show unto His servants things which must shortly come to pass; and He sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John" (Rev. 1:1). The word "signified" is the Greek word semaino which is a derivative of the word semo meaning a mark or sign, or to indicate by signs or symbols. The English word could be written SIGN-I-FIED — demonstrating that it means to communicate by means of signs and symbols. We understand, of course, that is exactly how the Revelation was communicated to John and the whole book is a book of pictures and symbols!
Early in the book we meet a lamb. Even the literalists have enough sense to understand that the lamb is not a four-legged woolly little creature romping through the pasture squealing, "Baa...baa...baa...!" It is, in fact, Mary’s Little Lamb, but not the one in the nursery rhyme! We could preach on the "lamb" of God in any church in America and everyone would agree that this lamb is not a barnyard animal. But what amazes me is that they use an altogether different rule of interpretation on almost everything else in the book of Revelation! They spiritualize what they like and literalize what they don’t understand. Preachers have been preaching from the book of Revelation for centuries, identifying the lamb as a symbol for the man Christ Jesus who came to die for our sins, then proceed to assert that the throne of God is a seat somewhere out beyond the Milky Way that actually has a rainbow around it; the mark of the beast is an actual imprint on people’s foreheads; the blood flowing up to the horse’s bridles is literally going to happen over in the valley of Megiddo; and the New Jerusalem is a huge monstrosity that will one day come floating down out of the sky and land on the earth like a bump on a little boy’s head!
Jesus, in the days of His flesh, spoke often in the language of symbols. All of His wonderful parables were given in symbolic and allegorical language. But He also used symbols in His speech on many other occasions. The disciples were showing Jesus the temple and its grandeur. The gifts of the ages were reposited there, and the whole temple was built with the greatest cost and magnificence, so that nothing was more stupendous in all the nations. It was adorned with gold and silver and the whitest of marble, some of the foundation stones were more than sixty feet long, seven and a half feet high and nine feet broad. Jesus stood taking it all in, and gazing at the temple, said, "Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up again!" This totally "blew" the carnal minds of those standing there who heard these words! They were incensed and were ready to kill Him. With countenances distorted by anger the Jews replied, "It took forty-six years to build this temple, and will you raise it up in three days?"
The seemingly strange language of the Bible is, in reality, picture language. Such expressions as, "the earth melted" at God’s voice, the earth reeling "to and fro as a drunkard," or the idea of those cast into "outer darkness" as "weeping and gnashing" their teeth are misleading to the carnal mind. The Bible is literally filled with symbolic language! Symbols or pictures are intended to clarify what the Lord wants to convey to us — but only to the one who hears by the Spirit! All others are confused. Some want to interpret the scriptures literally, and say that the spiritual interpretation is to change or "spiritualize away" the plain word of God. How can you spiritualize away that which is spiritual! Jesus said, "The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life." Little wonder that years later on the isle of Patmos, among the visions He showed to John, He should say again and again, "He that hath an ear, let Him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches!"
Much more in the link:
The OP is just a little taste of the content in a 242 essay study on Revelation. The 242 essays go in order starting from Revelation 1:1. The author has 70 years of Christian Ministry under his belt and continues to write on the Revelation of Jesus Christ and how it applies to our world.
https://www.godfire.net/eby/
The above will take you to the index. I have started to reading this study from the essay #1, I'm currently up to essay #119. If you are a slow reader this study will take over a year to finish, but it will yield an excellent understanding of the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
I will be using this OP as a cross reference to those who want to literalize the book of symbols that Reveal Jesus Christ.
Thanks for sharing. I've been listening to teachings of Bill Donahue and his interpretations and symbolism. His website looks like it is still from 99 but the content is top notch. He touches on this, Lamb of God, Easter-the ram. Mind blowing interpretations of the Bible. https://www.hiddenmeanings.com
Amen.
Thank you, OP. I didn't know this existed.
That was a great article and timely as I was just warning people in a group against popularizing the Revelation. That would be applying modern objects or persons to biblical symbols in the revelation. (Locusts are helicopters is an example) The book says the waters which you saw are nations, kindreds and tongues so whenever water is mentioned we should think people. A great mountain burning with fire being thrown into the sea starts to make more sense when you get the symbol. However, this teaching takes it to the next level. I’ll probably dive deeper into more of this series. Thought provoking.
Thank you. Revelation is so intimidating & trying to put together daniel’s prophecies & visions with John’s & that which is recorded in revelation flabbergasts me!
I like The People’s Bible series. Each book of the bible was commented by a pastor or group of pastors. It really helps to know the history, language context, or symbolic references. These are the two authors who handled the books you mention:
The People’s Bible: Revelation by Wayne D. Mueller.
The People’s Bible: Daniel by John Jeske
Northwestern Publishing house first put them out, then Concordia Publishing I think. Both are available, though I don’t know if there are updates in the later versions. I bought the print versions years ago when they first came out with purple covers, but have been getting the Northwestern Publishing House Kindle versions lately to have them available on my phone.
Thanks! I’m going to have to look up the app for my phone too!
Kindle is a free e-book reading app from Amazon. A lot of books have Kindle versions in addition to print versions and the kindle versions usually cost a bit less.