"Nuremberg Trials of 1945-1946 is being aired on SBS TV right now in Australia. The White Hats are letting us know it's coming."
This is a bold statement. Statements like that should be either backed up, or posed as questions, in my opinion. Because this is simply an assertion.
Seems to me that making assertions without evidence or discussion is actually kinda anti-Q. Q's posts were all about getting people to investigate, to think, to apply logical reasoning, evidence and to vet information. "Due diligence".
Is it interdasting timing? I'd say yes. Could it be white hats letting us know? I seriously doubt that. I don't think the white hats are interesting in letting any anons know "that's its coming" because we have all the information already.
If it is anything, it is likely to be White Hats preparing normies psychologically by planting seeds.
One comment.
"Nuremberg Trials of 1945-1946 is being aired on SBS TV right now in Australia. The White Hats are letting us know it's coming."
This is a bold statement. Statements like that should be either backed up, or posed as questions, in my opinion. Because this is simply an assertion.
Seems to me that making assertions without evidence or discussion is actually kinda anti-Q. Q's posts were all about getting people to investigate, to think, to apply logical reasoning, evidence and to vet information. "Due diligence".
Is it interdasting timing? I'd say yes. Could it be white hats letting us know? I seriously doubt that. I don't think the white hats are interesting in letting any anons know "that's its coming" because we have all the information already.
If it is anything, it is likely to be White Hats preparing normies psychologically by planting seeds.