I read a really good book on the economics of the drug trade. Essentially the vast majority would make more money working at McDonalds. However, all of them think one day they could end up at the top and don’t even think about the likelihood of being shot to death.
The problem is she thinks throwing money at the problem solves it. Time to teach consequences.
Even more basic problem is knowing the difference between good and evil and right and wrong.
Instead of violent crime, she wants to thieve $ and placate (reward?) the criminals for their crimes.. in the hope that maybe they wont be as bad for a little while?
If you knew how to fix the crime problem, then you either wouldn't have caused it in the first place.. or you would have fixed it by now. So you dont know how to fix it. Why take advise from a person who doesn't have any clue?
They've been hyping their war on poverty since the days of LBJ, and yet for all the money supposedly thrown at a solution poverty, ghettos, and rampant crime still exists. Why?
Because their war was on your wallet in order to fill theirs. The poor have gotten nothing but the crumbs to keep up appearances of doing something.
Cops put bad people in jail. Bad people can’t do bad things. Very simple. To say otherwise shows you are a dipshit or you have a political agenda.
...as much as I would love to endorse option #1...
...I am going with option #2....
I read a really good book on the economics of the drug trade. Essentially the vast majority would make more money working at McDonalds. However, all of them think one day they could end up at the top and don’t even think about the likelihood of being shot to death.
Hasn’t she heard that song, “Mo Money Mo Problems”? It’s the Democrat national anthem.
The problem is she thinks throwing money at the problem solves it. Time to teach consequences. Even more basic problem is knowing the difference between good and evil and right and wrong.
...as she throws (our) money at the problem...
...some of it ends up sticking to her fingers....
I was thinking she could lead by example
Whatever you subsidize is exactly what you’ll get more of.
Instead of violent crime, she wants to thieve $ and placate (reward?) the criminals for their crimes.. in the hope that maybe they wont be as bad for a little while?
If you knew how to fix the crime problem, then you either wouldn't have caused it in the first place.. or you would have fixed it by now. So you dont know how to fix it. Why take advise from a person who doesn't have any clue?
They've been hyping their war on poverty since the days of LBJ, and yet for all the money supposedly thrown at a solution poverty, ghettos, and rampant crime still exists. Why?
Because their war was on your wallet in order to fill theirs. The poor have gotten nothing but the crumbs to keep up appearances of doing something.
Truth....
sounds like she takes advice from Meghan Markle.
The only reasonable question is how much money need to go into her pocket before the crime problem goes away.
...when she gets enough to buy something nice in the Caribbean...
...low crime down there...
...problem solved....