Scientific Method vs. Scientificism
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
That’s the underlying point we should all make because it gives someone trying to understand, a better understanding of the motives behind the skewing, manipulating and creating of data....
We need to understand that this strategy was implemented by the first Rockefeller who helped build all these educational institutions from the very beginning....
WWG1WGA
"Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."
Dwight D. Eisenhower Farewell Address 1961
Id add tenure as a great evil as well.
The science community and the medical community have both let us down.
To destroy HCQ, they cherry picked near death patients and gave them many times the recommended dose. Then claimed they had to stop the trial because all the patients that got HCQ died because it is so dangerous. And this got published.
They played games with the trial to see if the vaccines increased your chance of survival if you get infected. It turns out there is a period of increased vulnerability that lasts about 14 days after you get the jab. So what did they do? They declared that if you got infected with the Wuhan virus less than 14 days since getting the shot, you were considered 'unvaccinated'. It turns about that is around 46% of all Covid deaths from the vaccinated group were then transferred to the un-vaccinated group.
They did a similar thing to 'prove' there is no additional risk to pregnant women. They played around with the dates and declared that only miscarriages in this time frame count. And even that didn't get them their result, so then they actually included non-pregnant women in the study. It made no sense, but it got them the result they wanted.
They aren't doing science, folks. They are doing corrupt criminal network of psychopath things.
You happen to have the sauce for this stuff? I want to show this to a few people but without sources it won't go far. Thanks.
Fake HCQ Study. Listen to this guy he knows what he's talking about.
A professor of Medicine at Texas A&M University’s College of Medicine and practicing internist and cardiologist, he has published over 1000 publications and more than 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine.
https://vimeo.com/553518199#t=40m1s
Fraudulent Vaccine effectiveness study
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/alberta-gets-caught-palming-cards?r=jhq1b
Fraudulent Pregnancy Risk Study
You can go down the Problematic Studies section
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/horrifying-hidden-pfizer-data-show-unborn-babies-newborns-dying/
Thanks Lapstrake !
I hope it is useful, fren.
Thank you, Lapstrake. "The Sauce must flow."
This. They just dont use the scientific method. So without a method everything they can come in mind just turn to be valid or true
I dont thank yer makin the point you thank yer makin!
it has always been the right one