This site is getting people killed.
🤡 MSM Conspiracy Theory 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (126)
sorted by:
Look at poster's time on site and post count.
This is an OBVIOUS copy n paste SHILL POST didnt even change the text from 'this site'.
DO NOT FEED THIS TROLL
DEPORT
Im a healthcare professional whos worked the covid containment unit at the largest facility in our state since the very beginning. And read my response to his links.
Just because you and zeitreise can not understand the info you link doesnt mean it supports your case. Educate yourself please.
Point to studies about remdesivir that shows its safe, necessary and effective.
See you dont understand the concept of "the burden of proof". You people are making the claims that rem kills, so the burden of proof lies on your shoulders not mine.
If i claim that unicorns exist, its not your job to disprove it, but mine to prove they do. You wouldnt find much disproving their existence and you shouldnt need to.
No one on this site has posted any credible evidence suggesting that rem is even dangerous let alone an instrument of death like they make it out to be.
Look at how hostile some of these people get? Over something they know nothing about. This is either pure ignorance or they have an agenda.
For example look at the incoherent ramblings of zeitreise. He posts links debunking himself, screams hatred, and makes claims like hospitals are dosing people with fentanyl. All to further his agenda. Its insanity.
None of these claims can be supported.
You are dangerously out of touch with reality. Rambling about hospitals dosing people with fentanyl. Please take your meds.
Okay lets break these down.
The first article, how is our facility responsible for the fed creating an incentive? Theyre not. We use what works.
The first study, in the US over a period of a 7 months, 99 cases were reported. Out of how many thousands of doses given? Im willing to bet its a 0.1%.
Also notice the "most often nonsuspected co-reported active ingredients were norepinephrine (43 reports, 31.2%), enoxaparin (43, 31.2%), propofol (43, 31.2%), fentanyl (38, 27.5%), and midazolam (32, 23.2%)."
Fentanyl was reported in 27.5% of those 99 renal failures.
And you are really going to use 99 cases over a 7 month period, in which 27.5% of those were co-reported with fentanyl as you hard evidence? I dont think thats a hill you want to die on.
Its available to the public. Take it if you want, no one is stopping you. As it gets approved we'll incorporate it if he results are worthy.
so how many results make it 'worthy'? how long would they have to study it before it's approved