This site is getting people killed.
🤡 MSM Conspiracy Theory 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (126)
sorted by:
Point to studies about remdesivir that shows its safe, necessary and effective.
See you dont understand the concept of "the burden of proof". You people are making the claims that rem kills, so the burden of proof lies on your shoulders not mine.
If i claim that unicorns exist, its not your job to disprove it, but mine to prove they do. You wouldnt find much disproving their existence and you shouldnt need to.
No one on this site has posted any credible evidence suggesting that rem is even dangerous let alone an instrument of death like they make it out to be.
Look at how hostile some of these people get? Over something they know nothing about. This is either pure ignorance or they have an agenda.
For example look at the incoherent ramblings of zeitreise. He posts links debunking himself, screams hatred, and makes claims like hospitals are dosing people with fentanyl. All to further his agenda. Its insanity.
None of these claims can be supported.
You made the claim that remdesivir saves lives. So the burden of proof is on you to back that up.
My post is simply refuting your claim and the claim made by others. Rem does not kill and not a single one of you can prove that it does.
Why does a smear campaign persist on this site when it has zero supporting evidence? Youre a mod, you dont think you should do something about it?
Let me break your shilliness down:
First you make a post with the title:
Implying Remdesivir saves lives. And also implying Remdesivir is safe.
So here are the claims you are making:
Remdesivir saves lives
Remdesivir is a safe drug
The burden of proof is now on you for these two claims, which you refuse to provide except for saying that your facility uses Remdesivir and only 1 patient died per month during what you say was "when media was claiming morgues were overflowing.
The part about media is meaningless since its not backed by any evidence.
So only evidence (anecdotal, which is quite acceptable here) you are providing is:
But this evidence does not back up your claims in any shape or form. We cannot use this evidence to conclude that it saves lives. We can also not rule out that 1 death per month was not from your use of Remdesivir.