It’s a modern day 🔥book-burning🔥! Can I get an AMEN, ALLELUIA?! Link in comments
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You don’t understand SYMBOLISM, and this has nothing to do with online books. Further, they burned ouija boards, Disney glasses, etc, so you didn’t read the article. Burning this evil DOES send a message that WE are not going to tolerate filth and satanic witchcraft. If you can’t get that, I can’t help you. Further, this isn’t “authoritarian dictatorship”; this is a church. No, he’s not my pastor. I’m Catholic, we have an Index of Forbidden Books. For a reason. And lastly, no one here championing First Amendment should have any problem whatsoever with this FREEDOM. It works both ways.
Not going to tolerate it? Please elaborate on that. What happens when someone just buys more of that shit? Gonna steal it and burn it again?
Youre twisting my words to protect your argument. I did not call that church an authoritarian dictatorship. I said the vast majority of people associate book burning with authoritarian dictatorships. For good reason too.
I have zero issue with you having a bonfire with unusual fuel. Though I think its pretty funny to hear you bring up first amendment rights as you burn the words of other citizens.
Again, you don’t understand symbolism. I can’t help you. If someone associates a church with authoritative dictatorship in any context, that’s on them, not my problem. And it’s interesting that you can’t grasp that it’s equally protected to burn anything in this country, including the flag. You don’t have to like it. Free will, Amico.
Youre deflecting again. Twisting my words to try to keep a moral high ground. They arent associating the CHURCH with auth dictatorship theyre associating BOOK BURNING with it.
Lmfao i literally explicitly said i dont care if you have a bonfire. Use whatever fuel you want. Maybe you should read more books instead of burning them, would increase your reading comprehension skills.
Perhaps it is you with the reading comp deficit. You said: ”Book burning is IMMEDIATELY associated with authoritarian dictatorships by the vast majority of people. Go ask anyone you pass on the street "what comes to mind when i say "book burning"?" And see what they say.“ To which I said “If someone associates a church with authoritative dictatorship in any context , that’s on them, not my problem.”, in the CONTEXT that it’s the CHURCH burning the books; I did not say you said the church was an authoritative figure. You’re playing semantic gymnastics and accusing me of the very thing you’re doing. Disingenuous or an idiot. I don’t care that you don’t like it, ”Its unfortunate that its such an awful idea” you say, at the same time you claim this ”Lmfao i literally explicitly said i dont care if you have a bonfire. Use whatever fuel you want.” Bottom line, it’s my post and I stand by it 100%. Your feelings affect my stance not one bit, nullius pretii. Any further response by you will go ignored, but feel free to babble to yourself if it makes you feel “right”.