Wow, does the propaganda in the astronomy and basic sciences world really get this bad? Poor flat earthers!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 Obvious Trap 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (322)
sorted by:
Moonlight has a unique chilling effect.
Fun fact
Yes, moonlight is cold, which proves that it is not reflected sunlight, but a light of its own. Genesis 1:16. Cold light will not make sense to you unless you consider the plasmatic nature of the universe. Even NASA admits the universe is 99+℅ plasma, you can easily find this figure in NASA docs, even while they talk from the other side of their mouth about the "vacuum" of space. A "vacuum" filled with plasma is no vacuum. Furthermore, the odds that the sun (supposedly at approx. 93,000,000 miles away) and the moon (at approx. 238,000 miles) would have to be the exact size in proportion to their respective distances to be able to form a perfect eclipse when aligned, which is so improbable mathematically to be considered impossible.
Few set out to become "flat earthers", just as the majority here did not set out to discover the world operates through monstrous deeds to innocents by literal satantic minions, they come to conclusions based on studying the available evidence. I could not say with certainty what the shape of the earth is, but I know NASA lies about pretty much everything and their photographic evidence is admittedly cgi. I would recommend looking into the electric universe theory which, more specifically, is a plasmatic universe theory. The sun as a transformer, which transforms cosmic rays into UV to power our earth, is much more realistic than giant 4,385,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pound furnance 93,000,0000 miles away, and the moon as a plasmatic entity to rule the tides is more realistic that a giant rock that only shows its one face (don't bother explaining the "official" reason, I don't buy it) and emits its own cool light, obviously not reflected from the sun. I believe both in God's word: two lights, one to mark the day and one to mark the night, as well as actual science, which we are not getting from NASA.
Very curious that most here understand the government is lying to you in very fundamental ways, but somehow NASA is pure and truthful? Why would the government lie about global child trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, torture, murder, and the occult basis for this evil? Sounds crazier than thinking the earth and cosmos are not what they are purported to be, but most here have seen enough evidence to know the former is true but the latter is a psyop to make those researching alternative topics look like fools?
It also seems very shady that this would be posted here. There is no other reason to bring this up except to cause division and encourage users to ridicule and demean each other. Very disappointing that some are ridiculing others (who more than likely have done much more alternative research on the subject) just as you have been ridiculed about Q-related subjects yourselves.
Wouldn’t the vacuum of space pull apart planet atmospheres? If you have a ball or something in a vacuum chamber doesn’t it literally pull it apart? How are planet system able to hold their atmospheres? That’s an interesting thought I never reallly though about.
Exactly, and congrats, most people never get to the point of questioning it, or questioning any of the bullshit NASA spews. If you look closely at NASA's own literature, they tell a very different story than the propaganda they put out to the public. There is no "vacuum", space is comprised of plasma and the interworkings of the plasma is the real basis our physics. NASA has admitted in papers, and even on their youtube, that the earth is surrounded by a band of highly ionized plasmatic particles, so highly excited that they "act as glass" and are impenetrable. In biblical terms, the Firmament (Genesus 1:7-9). Werner von Braun during Operation Fishbowl attempted to nuke through the firmament but was unsuccessful, because it is not glass, it is a gigantic conglomerate of ionized plasma that can resist anything as it is not solid, it is like a hive that can commicate, give, take and stay resisilent. Von Braun's tombstone:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/von-braun/image-06-large.jpg
Psalm 19:1
19 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork
Couldn't have said it better.
"Look into it man, look into it!" -Eddie Bravo
And this comment is devoid of any scientific knowledge. Light, per se, has no temperature and is neither cold nor hot. In that respect it is like electricity. What we feel as warmth is only the radiant intensity (watts/square meter) shining on us. The Moon is not a perfect reflector and it is a diffuse reflector, so the intensity of the light is attenuated by these effects. (There is a slight spectral shift in the light, resulting from the Moon having some color.) If the Moon is self-emitting, I guess that means there should be no phases of the Moon, where the illumination is limited to the side facing the Sun, moving from fully lit to fully dark. Really, you should be ashamed of yourself. Even a 6-year-old can see that the Moon is lit from the Sun. Your ignorance about the Moon is massive. You are in no position to declare than any fact about it is unreasonable or impossible.
The photographic evidence of the Earth being round dates from the late 1960s and the Apollo program (chemical film, no computer-generated imagery). Since then, we haven't been far enough from the Earth to get it all into view. But we have plenty of strip maps of the surface going around and around the globe. More to the point, we have been circumnavigating the globe since Magellan, flying around it since Lindbergh, and orbiting it since Sputnik and Gagarin. We have been to the Moon, a number of times.
If NASA lies about anything, catch them in the lie and disclose the factual truth. They have been pulling our leg on "global warming" in a shameless display of tampered data (found). But NASA has not lied about going to the Moon or the Earth being round. The Soviets were professional liars, but they were happy to announce Sputnik and Gagarin truthfully. Don't fall into the paranoia trap of believing everything around you is a lie. That way, madness dwells.
I won't address this drivel point by point, because ALL LIGHT IS MEASURED BY TEMPERATURE! Lol! This is a basic fact! Do yourself a favor and pick up any book of analog photography and educate yourself on this. You just showed you have no clue of what you're saying. Anything you say after this is not worth anyone's time. I studied and worked as a professional photographer probably before you have been alive. Stiill laughing that you think light is not measured by temperature, one of the dumbest things I've read, because you are so commited to your ignorance like most hipster fucks who need to go back to reddit. As for the phases of the moon, since they are not a reflection of the sun, they may be a reflection of unseen body or, more likely, an internal plasmatic projection. As for NASA and their lies, the dumbest response for NASA-fagboys is:"Why would the Russians play long"? Easy, when you have a brain. The Cold War benefited both, with fear-mongering and control of tje population. You may have just heard of The NWO , but it is not new and has been advancing for centuries. Please go read some basic photography books before to yry to school someone with decades more knowledge and experience. Good luck, sincerely.
You have to read carefully. I was talking about photons. They have no temperature. However, there is a characteristic Planck spectrum emitted by black- or grey-body emitters, giving rise to "color temperature" to specify how "white" a particular light source might be. But individual photons have no temperature, because identical photons can come from objects with a wide range of temperatures. (By the way, I am 71, have 3 degrees in aeronautics and astronautics---basically applied physics---specializing in optics and radiation, and have practiced the same for 40 years in industry. How old are you?) In any case, the point I was making is that the physical warmness of light is related to its intensity (watts/square meter), and that remains true no matter what the spectral distribution is. It is the stuff that makes directed energy weapons work.
The phases of the Moon are a reflection of sunlight. Look at the direction the light appears to come from, and...it is from the Sun. There is no significant plasma on the Moon, as those who have been there can attest. (And no reason to think there would be much. Not much of an atmosphere to become ionized by solar UV.) And when they were there, they saw the Sun lighting up the place. I mean, this is grade school stuff.
The Soviets were luxuriating in being first, in many ways. There is prestige in being first. It was a Space Race---but maybe you weren't there. Prejudice is no substitute for proof, and imagination is no substitute for learning.
Look, objects that emit Plank radiation have a spectrum that is related to temperature. That gives rise to the "color temperature" used to describe how blue or yellow "white light" is (important for film chemistry). But the actual physical warmth of light (how it feels on the skin) is measured by intensity (watts/square meter). That is true no matter the spectrum. That is how directed energy weapons work. Photons themselves have no temperature, only a wavelength. Photons of a given wavelength can be produced by objects of nearly any temperature...it is just a question of what proportions. Read more and you won't think it's so "dumb."
Nice to know you were a photographer. I'm 71 years old, have 3 degrees in aeronautics and astronautics---basically applied physics---including quantum and laser physics, and have applied that background to over 40 years working in industry. I'm not a tyke. I designed and analyzed directed energy weapons.
The Moon is illuminated by the Sun. All you have to do is look at the Moon, see which direction its illumination is coming from, and...it will point to the Sun. Even a child can figure this out. The Apollo astronauts saw the Sun lighting up the whole side of the Moon they were on. There is no plasma. You are just making up a fantasy.
What playing along? The Russians were for real, trying to be first in a lot of important ways. It was a Space Race---but I'm not sure you were there to see it. The problem with paranoia is that it traps you into a universe of ignorance that you can't escape, because any effort in that direction will necessitate reading "lies." You want to make the past 500 years of science and discovery go away. I've got news for you: it won't. The constellations are different depending on whether you are in the northern or southern hemisphere. Not possible for a flat world.
Sophia Smallstorm talks about the life-giving nature of sun and the detritus effect of moonlight. Very interesting.
Moonlight (or the moon's force) is not a detrimental force, it is an oppositional but necessary force. The moon's force controls the tides, the creatures of the sea, and surely many other things we do not know about. It is not negative, it about balance. This is only my personal opinion, but I do not believe God would create a light to negatively affect his sons and daughters. A perfect world include perfect balance, there will always be opposition, but that does not require negatively.