Yes, I agree, except that maybe there is an argument that we should keep ivermectin for the most health threatening situations because otherwise we might get ivermectin resistant viruses. more research needed there.
But the being lied to, yes, that should never have happened. I think ivermectin might have prevented many people dying from cancer too.
Back in the 90s I needed to travel and was given anti malarials ( possibly hydroxychloroquine).
Back then there was talk of us reaching the limit in terms of our ability to tackle certain diseases with mycin style antibiotics.
Ten years ago the NHS started a propaganda campaign to reduce the reliance on antibiotics.
I wonder now whether there may have been a hidden agenda or decision made in the 90s that they ( the DS) would freeze research and development for the masses and we just didn’t see the change introduced?
That is certainly possible, but OTOH I think that prophylactic antibiotics such as those given to factory farmed animals are likely to have caused bacterial resistance to antibiotics in the 20th C and that the effect is real, for example MRSA, resistant c.diff and e.coli. I think we need to re introduce treatments like iodine or silver as first line treatments for infection, and elderberry and zinc for colds, and keep the more specific drugs for second line.
Since we have been lied to so much that I am prepared to be wrong on the subject of resistance,
I agree with you and in relation to zinc , vitamins and many anti microbials the Pharma industry may be happy that say 80% of the population is in their hands for ever and that within the other 20% are the free thinkers who they would never convert.
A relative works in a branch of medicine and they have told me that every year the thumb screws are tightened on the ability to use traditional forms of chemicals.
The latest example, phenol can no longer be sold in its liquid form.
It has now been repackaged as single use type swabs. The cost is about 100 times the price of the traditional bottle per ml.
I expect that if the pharma industry carries on along its destructive path it is only a matter of time before they find ways to restrict zinc, silver copper etc to their repackaged products.
Yes, I agree, except that maybe there is an argument that we should keep ivermectin for the most health threatening situations because otherwise we might get ivermectin resistant viruses. more research needed there.
But the being lied to, yes, that should never have happened. I think ivermectin might have prevented many people dying from cancer too.
Back in the 90s I needed to travel and was given anti malarials ( possibly hydroxychloroquine).
Back then there was talk of us reaching the limit in terms of our ability to tackle certain diseases with mycin style antibiotics.
Ten years ago the NHS started a propaganda campaign to reduce the reliance on antibiotics.
I wonder now whether there may have been a hidden agenda or decision made in the 90s that they ( the DS) would freeze research and development for the masses and we just didn’t see the change introduced?
That is certainly possible, but OTOH I think that prophylactic antibiotics such as those given to factory farmed animals are likely to have caused bacterial resistance to antibiotics in the 20th C and that the effect is real, for example MRSA, resistant c.diff and e.coli. I think we need to re introduce treatments like iodine or silver as first line treatments for infection, and elderberry and zinc for colds, and keep the more specific drugs for second line.
Since we have been lied to so much that I am prepared to be wrong on the subject of resistance,
I agree with you and in relation to zinc , vitamins and many anti microbials the Pharma industry may be happy that say 80% of the population is in their hands for ever and that within the other 20% are the free thinkers who they would never convert.
A relative works in a branch of medicine and they have told me that every year the thumb screws are tightened on the ability to use traditional forms of chemicals.
The latest example, phenol can no longer be sold in its liquid form.
It has now been repackaged as single use type swabs. The cost is about 100 times the price of the traditional bottle per ml.
I expect that if the pharma industry carries on along its destructive path it is only a matter of time before they find ways to restrict zinc, silver copper etc to their repackaged products.