It's just a matter of how much Trudeau is going to lose
(media.greatawakening.win)
đźšš HOLD THE LINE đźšš
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (161)
sorted by:
Even if the media tries to reverse directions by considering what may be their best interests, it will be very-very hard to trust them ever again. Only the naive or willfully ignorant would ever keep continuing to listen to legacy media.
For months they've kept bashing on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, or pushing lies about the severity of various vax injuries. If they come out and apologize, then what? People have died, jobs were lost, and friendships broken between the political divides.
If CNN comes out and says, my bad we fucked up, let's move forward to try to work together for the future. How is that even going to play?
Things I'll never trust again
Pretty much wrapped up in these industries is greed for money and power and ego.
All we can live without. Most of what they know that is true we can also know. They all go to school to get their specialized brainwashing/programming and it's all for the almighty fake dollar. Each of these groups provide huge cadres of supposedly trusted people to make and enforce decisions on us for our own good?
In the end they are a programmed collective of idiots who we were actually smarter than during this entire bullshit reset. At best most are useful idiots, at worst evil.
add secret societies
Add cowardice to their list of adjectives..
I might hold off on medicine and certain sciences though. If it's peer reviewed, full abstract available, full journals, repeatable experiments, or has decent sample sizes of personal anecdotes, then i'll give it a go.
Too bad alot of the juicy info are gate keeped under complex terminology and concepts, or length of time to investigate that normal people can't be bothered with.
Hate to break it to you but peer-reviewed journals are chock full of inaccuracies and falsities both accidental and intentional, and they virtually NEVER get corrected or updated. IF they do, the updated info is rarely seen or acted on by people already invested in the prior false data.
"Science" isn't what people, including many doctors and scientists, think it is.
While it is often used as a bully pulpit, a deadly weapon against the masses, a white cloak in which to enrobe naked avarice and pure unspeakable evil, it is none of these things.
SCIENCE IS AN ONGOING DISCUSSION. PERIOD.
Science isn't something that ever gets "settled" by "consensus".
Science has nothing whatsoever to do with consensus. Consensus is a marketing word. Follow the money. When you hear the word consensus, grab your wallet, because money is on the line.
When real Science sees a consensus forming, it sets about trying to BREAK that consensus. Science seeks endlessly to poke HOLES in dogma and long-held tenets, to test and retest and replicate experimental results if possible, to disprove, to go after the Truth no matter what. Truth is all that matters to real scientists.
The con artists like Fauci (Fasci, Foul Qi, FauXi, Faux Xi, Foul Cheese, etc.), are not scientists. They are evil grifters who use knowledge of science as a scythe to cut a path to money, fame, and power for themselves—and to behead any who stand in their way.
Science isn't anything that can't be debated, or that you must ever blindly FOLLOW without questioning and examining and scrutinizing in minute detail—especially when other scientists are screaming that the data is wrong or dangerous.
Source: am retired doctor
Thanks, that's a great explanation. Theor system is falsley trusted v
I agree and respectfully disaree on some points.
I agree that science is an ongoing discussion, but disagree on the notion of peer review and full journals should be disregarded. Yes, there might be some inaccuracies, but i listed those as part of my criteria on giving at least source material a chance to analyze. A chance better than simply having spoke persons hailing "facts" as gospel without backing up their claims.
Pierre Kory's and FLCCC's review on ivermectin just recently is an excellent example. https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Ivermectin-in-the-prophylaxis-and-treatment-of-COVID-19.pdf
I think my idea of science is a little different than yours. For instance, new emerging sources have come out that certain anti-parasites are positive antagonists towards cancer. People are also claiming that they have cured their cancer with these anti-parasites. So, there are literature sources, personal anecdotes, and with the actual price of these anti-parasites being dirt cheap, the repeatability of these experiments is fairly easy to do. This all opens up more discussions about cancer. How is it related to gut health, how much parasites are causing problems for people, what is the relation to sugars or inflammation that causes cancer to proliferate, and many more exciting questions.
If a talking head adamantly tells me that his science is fact and indispensably the truth, then of course, I won't listen. That's just lazy and being willfully ignorant on my part. But if someone says one thing and backs it up with some sources, then I'll at least give them a chance.
I still think there's people out there trying to actually seek noble honors of trying to further knowledge instead of being motivated by nefarious means. If they present mountains of data showing some semblance of plausibility, the best anyone can do is at least give them a chance to hear them out.
I do think money is part of it but I read a piece from a doctor in rhe NHS that was written a couple of months ago. Your point about school made me think of something she had written in her piece.
The link on the Milgram experiments reinforces this if you aren't familiar with them. (She doesn't link it,, but IMHO,, the Zimbardo prison study does too - Zimbardo himself did not realize until later how much he had slipped into the role of 'warden' rather than objective researcher and just how easy that was.)
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-have-we-doctors-been-silent/