It depends on whether they can represent the pattern consistently and evenly even when it is not represented. Some bad people are Jews, some bad people are not. It's more agreeable to align with good people and be against the bad ones. Unless you are suggesting that all are bad, but I can guarantee you there is a lot more nuance than you probably think. Another pattern is the uniting of people to a common enemy to deflect on internal problems, and part of a fascist playbook.
I haven't lost count either. Sometimes the pattern get's too over pronounced where that's all you can see (not saying you - but it's a common theme here). But I would rather focus on who the enemies are and what they are doing, not the groups they belong to as to not devalue the enemy. Totally agree we need to be better to call out the bad apples and that sets everything back - Jews are 70% lefty and the Russian backgrounds are the ones that introduced the blasphemy of socialism/communism unto this world and it's a big problem from my perspective.
I don't think so based on my philosophy of what money is. Silver is too important of an industrial commodity and gets suppressed because of industrial capacity and less because of it's monetary metal characteristics where gold is the opposite. I think the natural evolution would not be a fixed golden standard of olden times (perhaps further out in the future) but a floating gold standard where debt is still denominated in weight in gold but countries can debase their currency against gold freely. I think silver would have a place, since gold will to be too expensive that no paper/IOU can be trusted to break it up and that is where silver comes in.
I'll start out by declaring my biases as a Zionist. By it's definition it simply means that Jews have the right to self determine in their ancient homeland. It comes from centuries of persecution living under Christian rule in Europe and under Muslims in the middle east, and unfortunately Communism is another byproduct of this as well. Judiasm is not expansionary in it's very nature unlike Christianity and Islam, it's a combination of the people and religion and we don't make it easy to convert (even more so if you are an adult uncircumcised male).
The Talmud are a bunch of Rabbis arguing law and ethics using the Tenach as it's base, which encompass the Torah and the book of prophets. It was never meant as a dogmatic teaching but encouraging ongoing interpretation. There has been points of history where the Talmud was used as a means to spark hatred on the Jews out of frustration for the lack of Jews converting to Christianity, like Martin Luther particularly where he used the fact the Talmud contains a Yeshu who was a bastard child (as per the definition of mamzer is a byproduct of an illicit union). This Yeshu" was a student of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Perachiah, a figure dated to the 2nd century BCE (Hasmonean period) not during the time of Christ and the manner of death was not the same, but it was still used for rhetorical attacks by Luther to portray the Talmud as anti-Christian, fueling anti-Jewish sentiment despite these historical discrepancies.
I was doing more research on this and wanted to know what you all thought about this:
“The antisemites of this world are right – the Jews do run the world – but not in the way they think.”Sinclair elaborates that this refers to a spiritual concept from Rabbi Chaim Volozhin’s Nefesh HaChaim, where the Jewish people’s adherence to Torah and mitzvot (commandments) influences divine blessings or consequences for the world. He explicitly clarifies that this is not about political, economic, or conspiratorial control, as you lot might claim, but rather a metaphysical responsibility rooted in Jewish theology.
It's going to be a bumpy ride but I have hope that we'll arrive to the right conclusion in the end with or without me. I had my doubts on this forum now and then, but this has been a breath of fresh air so thank you again. I'll pray for the health of your family and Kia kaha!
Thank you very much for your kind words, it truly meant a lot for me to hear it- and I'm sorry I'm late to respond as well but I just had to deal with life the past week.
I feel the same about critical thinking and questioning everything - I try to do the same and think everyone would be better off with that perspective particularly that we are in an information war. Such a perspective you won’t be let down by the truth. It's also a pet peeve of mine when people throw out the words anti-semite, racist, etc.. where it doesn't exist because it devalues the term where it does. Like why can't I talk about globalism where people say it's an anti-semitic dog whistle. It bothers me to no end, but it seems part of the enemy playbook to use this language to steer people into certain behaviors.
I don’t doubt that Israeli leadership is up to nefarious purposes like every sovereign in the west and absolutely I believe they have a globalist element. I believe that Jews have too many communists as well that I will never stand in solidarity with even if we share the same beliefs about Zionism, although I find it hard to believe as they hold no regard for the concept of sovereignty.
I don’t forget that Netanyahu was the first congratulate Biden after the 2020 election, they were first to force the vaccine unto their people, and most importantly about October 7th, after being there seven times and witnessing the security state that it is - it’s unfathomable to me that they would take 5-7 hours to respond to the terrorist attack. While I don’t believe (or I don’t want to believe) that they would have planned out this attack on their own people and was a false flag, at the very least they could have allowed the severity for the future optics, and based on their covid response it shouldn’t come as a surprise. Taking that to account, Israelis are as much the victims that are never even considered by the anti-zionist brigade, and I will not heed an argument from people that can only see ordinary Jews/Zionists as the boogeyman behind every atrocity.
I tend to be optimistic in the long term vision of where we are headed, which might be a little naive and radical compared to where we are at. The nuclear arsenal was developed based on the concept of mutually assured destruction. I don’t think of Iran fitting into that mold considering the tenants of Sharia Law, the level of disdain and fear they have for their own people (they had only around 17% support) and the culture of sacrificing their people for their own political gains. If peace through strength is upon us - then a subdued radical base allows the movement away from Guns and more towards Butter. We all know, which way the neocons and Israel is geared towards today, and perhaps out of necessity. The Abraham accords sets a different tone that is geared towards prosperity, and I believe that is a central tenant behind Trump’s vision for the world and not just the United States.
From there further steps to denuclearize the world can take place, which lucky enough the US/Russia has already provided the blueprint, and Iran attaining a nuclear arsenal could only hurt that vision.
Anyways, thanks again for your words, it really made my day to read your response and like you I feel a sense of relief to engage in an open dialogue such as this.
He didn't ignore congress, the executive branch has a 60 day imminent threat loophole under the War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548): The President, as head of the executive branch, has the authority to deploy U.S. military forces in response to an imminent threat without prior congressional approval, but there are specific constraints. The President can commit forces for up to 60 days
I'm seeing unconfirmed reports that Iran president, Masoud Pezeshkian has resigned. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/flash-president-of-iran-resigns
The main difference to the above is that Persians are not Arabs. The mistake the Shah made the last time was suspending democratic opposition and and centralized authority under the monarchy and persecuting the opposition. The Ayatollah used this to their advantage and was very effective in their propaganda. They would have to be careful again or it can repeat. Perhaps there is a deal to made which could carve out part of the country with port access/acces to resources, etc. and they can coexist side by side but that is messy as well.
The Jewish way way to say God is Hashem - which means "The Name" or Adonai - which means "Lord", Jews are not allowed to pronounce the word. As a side, there were different regions with different names, as the other name for God is "El" and the Torah uses both.
Sometimes the pattern is unwarranted - it get's cherry picked into propaganda while there are corrupt ones to validate the claim. I'm having to juggle between the two and it takes discernment to understand what is true and not true. I can understand from their point of view based on how much propaganda is out there, while there is some truth to help validate their claims.
I can only address my speculations as to why there are so many and I have more experience in this matter just with talking to so many in community and family. I think Jews have too many communists. It was born out of Jewish persecution in Russia and that ideology has still captured generations later. It's against sovereignty in principle, and consistent what the globalists want to achieve by attempting to strip away sovereignty. I can presume the motivation is to and have a dedicated/permanent overclass that has complete control over the economy and way of life and play god (a global stake holder capitalism). But I don't believe this class to be monolithic but a broader spectrum of corrupted individuals.