The crack pipes are the nail in the coffin for me. We are most definitely watching a movie 🍿
🧠 These people are stupid!
There's no way in hell the Democrats who for decades ran a well tuned and well oiled criminal corruption machine that was very efficient and ran like a sewing machine they had it down to an art and were very careful of their actions they were successful so you mean to tell me that they are going to blatantly steal an election and take office and immediately throw it all clean out the window and start tossing monkey wrenches into their well tuned well oiled machine shutting it down and then replace it with a Barnum and Bailey circus tent and act. No I don't think so We are watching a movie 🍿
I agree, but even waking up the masses won't be enough. Every lesson learned could easily be wiped out in a few generations. As long as there is a centralised monopoly on the use of force this will happen again. That is, as long as there is a government evil people will seek to control it and subvert our society.
IMO, after thinking about it for years, my best concept so far of a real answer to this:
I can only envision this not ever being a problem again in a society where sociopaths and psychopaths are detected regularly and early, and are given treatment and treated like handicapped people with a disorder that might not prohibit them from being society members and doing things like pilot, surgeon etc..., but which would automatically preclude them from positions wielding any power, and in a society where psychopaths and sociopaths - and the people in their lives and in the community - are able to be open about their condition so that we know who they are and where they are.
We do this with schizophrenics. We should also be this way about psychopaths and sociopaths. They damage everything they touch, and it is a thousands-year-old problem that no one from any society I know of is ever willing to touch with a ten foot pole.
If we don't get a grasp on this issue, no society will ever be able to reach even half it's full potential.
That's where I'm at with it all.
Psychopaths and sociopaths are definitely a huge problem for the whole of humans society. A lot will form in communities and create cults that tear gullible sheep to pieces. Whatever they infiltrate they destroy. They always want power. They have a desperate need to have power over others because that's the only way they can put on their fake mask. They live in fear that they will stick out and be noticed as "abnormal".
They can never have enough control. They always need more. They have a much smaller and poorly developed paralimbic system that seems to cause the lack of empathy. There are actually treatments that can get around this and help psychopaths develop empathy, but for some reason the medical community doesn't want to do this. I get a feeling that the DS wanted to make more people without conscience, not less.
Psychopaths and sociopaths took over the human race and ran it for the past thousand or more years. This is the first time they're getting pushed out and they can't stand it. A human race without them in control of us would be beautiful. It would flourish, but we have to learn to recognize them. They don't get what is morally wrong about hurting a child. Most don't get what's the big deal. How do you deal with someone like that?
>How do you deal with someone like that?
I have had deep DEEP discussions with libs and redpilled alike about this.
I think it depends on whether or not they're violent. They MAY have a function in society. For example I hear they make excellent surgeons, emt's, morticians, precisely because the empathy never gets in the way.
But if you put that aside for a minute, this is how I pose it to people during group discussions:
Let's say you live in a tribal society, in a tribal world. Stone age or whatever. And let's say some violent psychopath kills a member of your community. You are the community elder. What do you say should be done with that person.
This is where the libs often diverge from the redpilled, because they're much more inclined to not know what to say.
The redpilled will usually suggest that that person should be -shall we say- dispatched.
The liberal will then put up a wall of resistance over that. So you ask the liberal, "Well then, what ELSE would YOU do with them?" And sometimes you hear "put them in exile" or "send them out of the community"
And I will come back with "If you don't send them far enough away, how can you be sure they won't come back and kill again? Also, let's say you do send them away and they don't come back. But then won't they just happen upon another tribe, and commit the same offense? and if they do, are you not partially morally responsible for what they've done since you were the one who turned them loose?"
Liberals short out at that point in the discussion and refuse to go further.
But if this were tribal days, psychopaths would not survive the way they do in our society. Much the same way in lots of past societies retards and freaks don't survive, and the weak and sickly don't survive... if you have a handicap, then you are fully dependent on your tribe, and sometimes you don't get any protection from them and youre screwed. Or sometimes their protection isn't enough to save you from your own stupidity or weakness.
In other words, they live off our graces, when it comes right down to the natural order, and that's true even today because I don't care who you are or how much power or means you have, if ALL the people turn against you and attack you, you're one fried biscuit.
So they survive by concealment of their condition, but this isn't going to work anymore. And we should take back our collective power to deal with them in an effective way that separates them safely from any levers of power, and keeps society safe.
It's an interesting topic for sure. Many are afraid to talk about it because there is no easy answer. Psychopaths and sociopaths gain a big advantage in that they are not bound by empathy and can brake society norms. Many probably don't end up killing people, but they'd all have no problem doing so if it gave them an advantage.
They are all parasites. They can't make society. Society needs empathy. People without empathy can't make those bonds. They copy others and learn to blend in. Even worse is that many psychopaths and sociopaths are drawn to live near each other (Washington, DC) and they can only support themselves if they have a lot of money from the sheep. The problem is that they have a relentless need to control and prevent discovery of themselves. They also think they are superior to other people because their ability to break rules gives them an advantage in society.
They can cheat and not feel bad about it.
When a civilization gets too many psychopaths and sociopaths it starts falling apart and descends into chaos. They can't fix the problem because they'll never police themselves. (Psychopathic politicians will defend psychopathic criminals). It's not even that they say "Hey I'm a psychopath". Many probably don't even realize what they are, but they know they are different from others.
Societies, like a host, can only survive so many psychopaths in control before it collapses. They can't build a community. When they enter one they try to take over, bring in more like them and destroy all resistance to their behavior.
I saw a video once about a psychopath who raped and murdered dozens of women. Many were girls between 8-12. When asked, "Why do people trust you?" He look confused and struggled for an answer until he said, "Because I look trustworthy". He had no idea what trust really was. It was all about tricking people.
You see it in Roman Polanski's work. He is a clear psychopath to me. In his stories characters are stilted and emotionless like he doesn't know how to write characters driven by love and trust. To him it's just someone got duped.
In their minds they don't get what's wrong about exploiting others. You want it, so why not take it. Society can't function that way. That's why their communities end up filthy, disorganized and riddled with crime. Psychopaths and sociopaths will not put their wants aside for the good of society.
They don't even function well if too many in the family have the trait. Imagine if two psychopathic parents have a psychopathic son. Why on Earth would he take care of them? He might try to find an easily controllable wife to do that job, but he'll never do it himself. They shield each other, but they don't sacrifice to help each other.
They need us to build what they take over.
I have a very dear friend that is in the social worker field. Her daughter has chosen the same path. Mom works with addicts, daughter with womans issues. My friend would appear to be liberal but is actually a conservative. Daughter is beyond liberal. My friend thinks if you just love people enough they will correct their behavior. I believe that discipline is the answer. I've known my friend for 23 years and the results of our beliefs are on full display. We both have a child that has ADHD. Mine in an engineer, hers is flirting with prison. My daughter is a microbiology manager at a large university. Her daighter cares about "women's issues" All our kids live away from where they grew up due to employment. We were discussing whether the kids would return home if TSHTF. She said that she never expects her daughter to come home regardless of how bad it gets because "woman would need her help in the city". I'm asked how that made her feel and she wouldn't answer. Point being, what good is empathy if it only directs you outward? Human issues do exist in your own hometown so to speak. What makes you an upstanding productive person? Sometimes empathy needs to be tempered with disappointed and loyalty. Evil people use empathy to control others just as much as culture controls people.