"...These vaccines have shown great efficacy and safety profile... "
When alleged doctors/research scientists start out with a premise like that I tend to disregard whatever comes afterwards. Maybe they're just spewing the required propaganda to be able to publish their findings of yet more adverse effects of the jabs?
You hit the nail on the head fren. I worked in research for several years. There is a great deal of politics involved - like it or not. If they were to start out with a background statement that goes against the accepted scientific narrative, the paper will go no further. Everyone understands how the game has to be played in order to get published. If making all those blah, blah, blah narrative statements do not impact the purpose of the study, then no harm no foul. It ends up being a necessary compromise in order to get the information out. However, I understand your frustration. It is ridiculous that it has to be this way.
The censorship is really hindering the ability of good scientists and doctors to put forward legitimate and valuable studies. Others need the data they have and it is ultimately that data that is the most important and what needs to be published. Good researchers and practitioners that utilize the information are less concerned about the political overtones of a promoted narrative. They simply ignore it. The consumers of the research extract from it the data they need and come to their own conclusions.
The authors in this paper did not need to make the claim that vaxxines are bad in order to show an association between swollen lymph glands and the shot. That was not the primary objective of the study. They are drawing no conclusions as to why the condition is observed nor speculating on the biological mechanisms involved - only that it is present and that it seems to be associated with administration of the inoculations. Based on the findings, recommendations can be made regarding care of patients that could be impacted by such conditions such as cancer patients.
These are the main takeaways:
Lymphadenopathy has been widely reported post-COVID-19 vaccination including patients undergoing follow-up FDG-PET-CT scans which showed increased FDG uptake.
Care must be taken before suspecting lymph node metastasis or deciding for lymphadenectomy following COVID-19 vaccination
This ALL needs to stop. All the BS, all the lies, all the deception, all the systems (financial/monetary incentives) put in place to facilitate this, all the games. This is not okay and it needs to end. People shouldn't have to wade through a minefield of deceit to extract nuggets of truth and put them in perspective to understand what's being communicated. I understand what you're saying and have for years, but we can't keep going forward in life accepting"necessary evils" because they are NOT necessary and, in fact, are destructive to society.
Science, healthcare, politics, education, business and all the others need to be cleaned from top to bottom and this BS eradicated. I shouldn't have to read a research report or a "news" article like "...(lie)...(lie)...(propaganda)...(sad appeal to virtue-signallers)...(lie)... Ooh! A nugget of truth! ...(lie)..." And it's become painfully obvious that large swaths of our populace are unable to pull out the truth from the BS. We shouldn't, as a society, tolerate this.
I know we have a hell of a storm coming that we need to survive, but on the other side of it, as part of our rebuilding efforts we need to make sure future generations are taught critical thinking and we need ways to eradicate this kind of garbage, to identify it as it starts to rear it's ugly head and nip it in the bud then. The systems that have been put in place to facilitate the deception need to be dismantled. (End of rant). Sorry, but I REALLY am tired of this entire concept of "necessary evil". Evil isn't necessary; Truth is necessary.
I agree with your sentiments completely. I apologize for making it sound like excuses - I was only offering an explanation. In an ideal world, those sentiments you expressed would be the norm and not the exception - and that world should always be in our sights. And yes, you should call it out. Sadly, we do not live in that perfect world much less live in it with perfect people - yet. Until then, sometimes we may be forced to do what we must to try and make this a better place - even though it may not be as perfect as it could be.
And yes, truth is necessary and all of the censorship I believe has started to wake up colleagues to the realization that playing the game has not been good. Maybe it has taken something as serious as the current scientific crisis they now find themselves in to finally wake them up and that they must take a stand for complete truth. But this beast is huge and it will take some time to kill. The battle is tiresome and there are casualties. The whole process disgusted me and I refused to play along. Like you I demanded truth and integrity and called the BS out for what it was. That is why I left. Unfortunately, my loss did not shift anything. That is just the reality. I refused to play along and left research and it did not even cause a ripple. That truly is sad. I was but a guppy swimming in a huge shark tank.
I do not fault you for your opinions - because they are right. And I pray that world you speak of I will see in my lifetime. God bless fren.
No need to apologize, friend. Certain subjects just get my ire up and the fact that things like this are occuring incenses me. I didn't think you were trying to make excuses for this, just giving an accurate description of the pathetic reality we find ourselves mired in. I watched AFD live in DC and an hour later they were banned. Two long-time obviously very intelligent doctors-researchers in California speaking out against the lockdown ... And banned/censored. And the list goes on.
My prayers are the same as yours, but I have to say - God willing - I do believe we'll see the start of this new and amazing world in my lifetime (and I'm not a young person). It's going to take decades to clean out and rebuild, why I say "the start of" and that will be just fine by me. Just knowing that future generations can live in the Truth brings joy to my heart and soul.
God bless you - and so very many other people worldwide - fighting for all that truly matters. 🙏✨
My brain hurts, but this is my partial takeaway: people who get the jab are likely to experience swollen lymphnodes, so hay cancer docs don't get all worked up. It may cause cancer in some of those people, especially those more susceptible, but we are not really saying that. By the way, don't be worried, other vaccines do the same thing, wink, wink. Obviously, the researchers are going to find it hard to throw the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry under the bus, since they know where their bread is buttered.
My fren, even though your head hurts, you did a good job distilling that all down and grabbed the main points - even if they were not explicitly stated. They are saying some things without actually saying them. This study is only pointing out the the fact that a flag is there - nothing else. It will be up to others to examine the why and how behind the flag and what it will do next. You are most correct in that researchers are not likely to bite the hand that feeds them. Working in research often is not the altruistic picture of noble scientific exploration that is often painted. It can be very dog eat dog and political - especially when huge amounts of money are at stake.
"...These vaccines have shown great efficacy and safety profile... "
When alleged doctors/research scientists start out with a premise like that I tend to disregard whatever comes afterwards. Maybe they're just spewing the required propaganda to be able to publish their findings of yet more adverse effects of the jabs?
You hit the nail on the head fren. I worked in research for several years. There is a great deal of politics involved - like it or not. If they were to start out with a background statement that goes against the accepted scientific narrative, the paper will go no further. Everyone understands how the game has to be played in order to get published. If making all those blah, blah, blah narrative statements do not impact the purpose of the study, then no harm no foul. It ends up being a necessary compromise in order to get the information out. However, I understand your frustration. It is ridiculous that it has to be this way.
The censorship is really hindering the ability of good scientists and doctors to put forward legitimate and valuable studies. Others need the data they have and it is ultimately that data that is the most important and what needs to be published. Good researchers and practitioners that utilize the information are less concerned about the political overtones of a promoted narrative. They simply ignore it. The consumers of the research extract from it the data they need and come to their own conclusions.
The authors in this paper did not need to make the claim that vaxxines are bad in order to show an association between swollen lymph glands and the shot. That was not the primary objective of the study. They are drawing no conclusions as to why the condition is observed nor speculating on the biological mechanisms involved - only that it is present and that it seems to be associated with administration of the inoculations. Based on the findings, recommendations can be made regarding care of patients that could be impacted by such conditions such as cancer patients.
These are the main takeaways:
Lymphadenopathy has been widely reported post-COVID-19 vaccination including patients undergoing follow-up FDG-PET-CT scans which showed increased FDG uptake.
Care must be taken before suspecting lymph node metastasis or deciding for lymphadenectomy following COVID-19 vaccination
This ALL needs to stop. All the BS, all the lies, all the deception, all the systems (financial/monetary incentives) put in place to facilitate this, all the games. This is not okay and it needs to end. People shouldn't have to wade through a minefield of deceit to extract nuggets of truth and put them in perspective to understand what's being communicated. I understand what you're saying and have for years, but we can't keep going forward in life accepting"necessary evils" because they are NOT necessary and, in fact, are destructive to society.
Science, healthcare, politics, education, business and all the others need to be cleaned from top to bottom and this BS eradicated. I shouldn't have to read a research report or a "news" article like "...(lie)...(lie)...(propaganda)...(sad appeal to virtue-signallers)...(lie)... Ooh! A nugget of truth! ...(lie)..." And it's become painfully obvious that large swaths of our populace are unable to pull out the truth from the BS. We shouldn't, as a society, tolerate this.
I know we have a hell of a storm coming that we need to survive, but on the other side of it, as part of our rebuilding efforts we need to make sure future generations are taught critical thinking and we need ways to eradicate this kind of garbage, to identify it as it starts to rear it's ugly head and nip it in the bud then. The systems that have been put in place to facilitate the deception need to be dismantled. (End of rant). Sorry, but I REALLY am tired of this entire concept of "necessary evil". Evil isn't necessary; Truth is necessary.
I agree with your sentiments completely. I apologize for making it sound like excuses - I was only offering an explanation. In an ideal world, those sentiments you expressed would be the norm and not the exception - and that world should always be in our sights. And yes, you should call it out. Sadly, we do not live in that perfect world much less live in it with perfect people - yet. Until then, sometimes we may be forced to do what we must to try and make this a better place - even though it may not be as perfect as it could be.
And yes, truth is necessary and all of the censorship I believe has started to wake up colleagues to the realization that playing the game has not been good. Maybe it has taken something as serious as the current scientific crisis they now find themselves in to finally wake them up and that they must take a stand for complete truth. But this beast is huge and it will take some time to kill. The battle is tiresome and there are casualties. The whole process disgusted me and I refused to play along. Like you I demanded truth and integrity and called the BS out for what it was. That is why I left. Unfortunately, my loss did not shift anything. That is just the reality. I refused to play along and left research and it did not even cause a ripple. That truly is sad. I was but a guppy swimming in a huge shark tank.
I do not fault you for your opinions - because they are right. And I pray that world you speak of I will see in my lifetime. God bless fren.
No need to apologize, friend. Certain subjects just get my ire up and the fact that things like this are occuring incenses me. I didn't think you were trying to make excuses for this, just giving an accurate description of the pathetic reality we find ourselves mired in. I watched AFD live in DC and an hour later they were banned. Two long-time obviously very intelligent doctors-researchers in California speaking out against the lockdown ... And banned/censored. And the list goes on.
My prayers are the same as yours, but I have to say - God willing - I do believe we'll see the start of this new and amazing world in my lifetime (and I'm not a young person). It's going to take decades to clean out and rebuild, why I say "the start of" and that will be just fine by me. Just knowing that future generations can live in the Truth brings joy to my heart and soul.
God bless you - and so very many other people worldwide - fighting for all that truly matters. 🙏✨
Amen fren - may it be so.
My brain hurts, but this is my partial takeaway: people who get the jab are likely to experience swollen lymphnodes, so hay cancer docs don't get all worked up. It may cause cancer in some of those people, especially those more susceptible, but we are not really saying that. By the way, don't be worried, other vaccines do the same thing, wink, wink. Obviously, the researchers are going to find it hard to throw the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry under the bus, since they know where their bread is buttered.
My fren, even though your head hurts, you did a good job distilling that all down and grabbed the main points - even if they were not explicitly stated. They are saying some things without actually saying them. This study is only pointing out the the fact that a flag is there - nothing else. It will be up to others to examine the why and how behind the flag and what it will do next. You are most correct in that researchers are not likely to bite the hand that feeds them. Working in research often is not the altruistic picture of noble scientific exploration that is often painted. It can be very dog eat dog and political - especially when huge amounts of money are at stake.