And the email to Fauci describing in detail the function enhancement with not just one, but 2 different HIV strains, is also science fiction?
Let's see if you can follow the logic here. I'm not asking if you agree, just asking if you can follow the logic.
IF ... HIV does not exist ... THEN it must mean that "HIV strains" also do not exist ... AND ... anything Fauci or anyone else claims about using HIV strains ... is science fiction, correct.
Including VAIDS now reported all over the place by so many independent and on our side labs?
They are not reporting it as if they can see it and identify it. They are working on a THEORY that something MIGHT be happening for a particular reason.
Big difference.
They are all DS now?
No, they are not black hats. Montagnier might be. I don't think Malone and some others are. They can be WRONG, though.
I stopped posting here a while back, just because of this exact issue.
So ... instead of having a DEBATE about some of the most important topics of our lifetime ... you ... ran away because your feelings were hurt?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Grow up.
a number of posts ... are simply extremely destructive and confusing in so many ways.
Why don't your ... GROW THE FUCK UP?
I am open to a DISCUSSION. I am not interested in someone who has NOT DONE ANY FUCKING RESEARCH into a topic, and then just dismisses it as if they know what they hell they are dismissing.
Have your looked into Germ Theory and WHY there are a lot of smart people who are calling it out as a false theory?
HAVE YOU DONE THAT?
If no, do it FIRST and then get back to me for a discussion.
If you HAVE done that and you think they are wrong ... THEN STATE YOUR CASE, and I will have a discussion with you. Maybe you can teach me a thing or two.
I did not have these beliefs a year or so ago. BUT I LEARNED SOME NEW INFORMATION (something you seem to not want to do).
Based on BOTH arguments of BOTH sides, I have changed my views.
Are you capable of at least LOOKING at another viewpoint?
You sound like Justin Treudex, who can only reply to the truckers with, "But those ideas are harmful."
Fuck that. HAVE A DEBATE, OUT IN THE OPEN.
That's what normal people have done for thousands of years, before the interent made eveyone a fucking coward to discuss ideas they don't agree with.
Enhanced flu functionality, with 2 HIV strains by Wuhan/DARPA.Fauci/etc, is not science fiction
Again ... logical thinking (as Q would say):
IF ... viruses are not real ... THEN it necessarily follows that what you stated actually IS science fiction.
HIV is real.
Explain how that has ever been proven. It hasn't, as far as I can tell.
Let's stop with this myopic view on extremely important subjects.
You are the one with the blinders on, dude, and you run away when someone shows up with a different opinion.
Instead of having a discussion, you want to shut down and censor.
Let's see if you can follow the logic here. I'm not asking if you agree, just asking if you can follow the logic.
IF ... HIV does not exist ... THEN it must mean that "HIV strains" also do not exist ... AND ... anything Fauci or anyone else claims about using HIV strains ... is science fiction, correct.
They are not reporting it as if they can see it and identify it. They are working on a THEORY that something MIGHT be happening for a particular reason.
Big difference.
No, they are not black hats. Montagnier might be. I don't think Malone and some others are. They can be WRONG, though.
So ... instead of having a DEBATE about some of the most important topics of our lifetime ... you ... ran away because your feelings were hurt?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Grow up.
Why don't your ... GROW THE FUCK UP?
I am open to a DISCUSSION. I am not interested in someone who has NOT DONE ANY FUCKING RESEARCH into a topic, and then just dismisses it as if they know what they hell they are dismissing.
Have your looked into Germ Theory and WHY there are a lot of smart people who are calling it out as a false theory?
HAVE YOU DONE THAT?
If no, do it FIRST and then get back to me for a discussion.
If you HAVE done that and you think they are wrong ... THEN STATE YOUR CASE, and I will have a discussion with you. Maybe you can teach me a thing or two.
I did not have these beliefs a year or so ago. BUT I LEARNED SOME NEW INFORMATION (something you seem to not want to do).
Based on BOTH arguments of BOTH sides, I have changed my views.
Are you capable of at least LOOKING at another viewpoint?
You sound like Justin Treudex, who can only reply to the truckers with, "But those ideas are harmful."
Fuck that. HAVE A DEBATE, OUT IN THE OPEN.
That's what normal people have done for thousands of years, before the interent made eveyone a fucking coward to discuss ideas they don't agree with.
Again ... logical thinking (as Q would say):
IF ... viruses are not real ... THEN it necessarily follows that what you stated actually IS science fiction.
Explain how that has ever been proven. It hasn't, as far as I can tell.
You are the one with the blinders on, dude, and you run away when someone shows up with a different opinion.
Instead of having a discussion, you want to shut down and censor.
Sounds like a common tactic these days ...
You're not discussing, you're projecting. HIV does exist, doesn't matter if you understand that, or not. But keep deluding yourself.
I said:
Your reply was:
That is not a response to my challenge.
Explain how it has been proven.
You can't, because it hasn't.
You are not red pilled until you at least LOOK AT this argument from BOTH sides -- which you refuse to do, just like the sheep refuse to look.