The damned time line is completely fubar now.
In the report I am writing, I used the line "Drive by fruiting" from Ms. Doubtfire. I went to go find a clip of it so I could include it, but apparently it's now "Run by fruiting."
This time shift had better be worth it.
OMG!
WTF is happening to the timeline?
Of course he had a monocle!
I'm so angry right now, I could go on a drive by fruiting!
I actually saw something online that said we're mixing up the Monopoly banker with the Planter's Peanut Man who has a monocle.
Umm... The planter's peanut guy is a peanut. I can see clearly the monopoly box I played with many a Christmas eve in my head. I doubt it still exists; that was a while ago, but I can see it. I know exactly what it looks like. The guy has a monocle. This is not disputable.
I honestly don't have any idea what this Mandela thing is. I have found a ton of actual rewritten history stuff. I have some of it in my upcoming report. I have found evidence of them saying they have rewritten history, so I know that's a real thing. This whole Mandela thing is either:
I don't know which it is, but honestly, 3 is the most likely after everything I've seen. 1 is possible. 2 is not. There is no way. I remember some of these things so clearly. I played a fair bit of monopoly, and I had that guy on the cover, and he had a fucking monocle. I know it, there is no doubt. I can see it in my head. I didn't even know this was controversial until just now. This is TWO new Mandela's for me in the same day.
AAAAHHHHRRRRGGGH!!!
You made me go and dig out a Monopoly board that's from the 1960s. The banker does not have a monocle. I even looked at the cards, thinking it might have been used there, but no. He has a top hat and cane. That's it.
That makes (1) really hard to justify. I doubt they came into your house and replaced your 1960s monopoly board.
Timeline swapping is actually more plausible haha.
I suppose I must admit that it could be some sort of mis-association thing, but it's just too convenient. I remember some of these things as clear as any other memory. There is just no way that all of these "mis-memories" are shared in the way they are by all of us having the same "mis-association." There is just too much fuckery to buy something like that.
The weird thing is though, if someone went back and changed history, it should be that our memories were changed right along with it. If time travel is the answer, this suggests that our minds, or that which makes us, us, is not linked to time in the same way as the rest of the physical world. This presents some problems, although possibly also a path to a solution for others.
Like what is mind/soul? What is the physical world? Why are they not directly linked together? What is the boundary?
However, the knowledge that they aren't linked would provide direction to long standing questions about the physical world. Notably that the physical universe is not the universe as we conceive of it (all which is); that there must be other layers to That Which Is, and our minds are a part of some other layer. Also, there must be at least some hierarchy of "realness" (dimensions/planes?) that transcends our concepts of what time is (linear) if our minds remember things that the physical world does not.
For some reason this is starting to remind me of Dark City (where they would come into your house and replace your monopoly board, but the "jab" for that day was deficient). I should rewatch that.
Unless that no longer exists?
lol