I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.
You don't know much. System engineering integrates all the design functions of an airplane. Credentials matter to separate those who understand the science and methodology from those who don't. Gas physics, aerodynamics, thermodynamics, atmospheric science...they are all under my belt. You continue to have no credentials. You don't say how old you are, so you are probably lacking experience. Here I mention that I have dealt with the possibility of designing a "chemtrail," and you want to say I don't know anything?
My view of a "tiny area"? Have you ever seen the aircraft plant in Everett, Washington? Bold talk for someone who is nowhere close to the action. Has an aerial lab sampled anything? I doubt that any such activity would ever be approved by the FAA, as it would require violation of the flight separation requirements. No evidence. Are you sure you aren't sampling meteoric dust? About 14 tons deposit on Earth every day. Same composition as your malignant materials. We do have aircraft that "sniff" for radioactive isotopes to detect nuclear detonations...but I don't think they are being used for "chemtrail" detection.
I assume you are referring to the hoax footage about the ballast system on a developmental airplane? Somebody is playing you like a fiddle. I've already viewed these BS videos of hoax expose, and a complete ignorance of contrails. Evidently, you can't do better than that.
Cloud cover? Where do you live? As a native of Puget Sound, I think I am an expert on cloud cover. We have plenty of it. And nothing is harmed thereby. We have verdant growth that requires constant maintenance to keep from overwhelming houses and property. Contrails have no effect on the received sunlight, compared to normal weather.
And you can't even be concerned about the real chemtrails from rocket exhaust. I think it is quite funny that I have to be the one to inform you about that. I give you something real...but not part of your narrative. You don't want to touch it. So much for your aspirations to be a scientist.
I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.
You don't know much. System engineering integrates all the design functions of an airplane. Credentials matter to separate those who understand the science and methodology from those who don't. Gas physics, aerodynamics, thermodynamics, atmospheric science...they are all under my belt. You continue to have no credentials. You don't say how old you are, so you are probably lacking experience. Here I mention that I have dealt with the possibility of designing a "chemtrail," and you want to say I don't know anything?
My view of a "tiny area"? Have you ever seen the aircraft plant in Everett, Washington? Bold talk for someone who is nowhere close to the action. Has an aerial lab sampled anything? I doubt that any such activity would ever be approved by the FAA, as it would require violation of the flight separation requirements. No evidence. Are you sure you aren't sampling meteoric dust? About 14 tons deposit on Earth every day. Same composition as your malignant materials. We do have aircraft that "sniff" for radioactive isotopes to detect nuclear detonations...but I don't think they are being used for "chemtrail" detection.
I assume you are referring to the hoax footage about the ballast system on a developmental airplane? Somebody is playing you like a fiddle. I've already viewed these BS videos of hoax expose, and a complete ignorance of contrails. Evidently, you can't do better than that.
Cloud cover? Where do you live? As a native of Puget Sound, I think I am an expert on cloud cover. We have plenty of it. And nothing is harmed thereby. We have verdant growth that requires constant maintenance to keep from overwhelming houses and property. Contrails have no effect on the received sunlight, compared to normal weather.
And you can't even be concerned about the real chemtrails from rocket exhaust. I think it is quite funny that I have to be the one to inform you about that. I give you something real...but not part of your narrative. You don't want to touch it. So much for your aspirations to be a scientist.