Ask me anything. My brain is on fire, and I can't cool it off. It's time I take the gloves off and you guys finally understand what's really been going on.
If you have any doubts that the Philosopher's Stone is real, look at Q post 196, Q post 197 and read the Story of Nicholas Flamel.
Ancient Egyptians considered gold “the skin of the gods” -- specifically the sun god Ra -- and often used it to craft objects of spiritual significance. Why is this relevant? - Q
The feet of this substance could not be cut off, meaning that it could not be fixed and so deprived of volatility except by such long decoction in the pure blood of young children. The quicksilver uniting with gold and silver in this blood would change with them, firstly into a herb like that of the fair flower on the reverse of the fourth leaf, secondly by corruption into serpents, which serpents, being dried and digested by fire, would become Powder of Gold, and of such in truth is the Stone. This explanation sent me astray through a labyrinth of innumerable false processes for a period of one and twenty years, it being always understood that I made no experiments with the blood of children, for that I accounted villainous.
To be perfectly clear, there are many Philosopher's Stones. It comes in many shapes, forms, sizes, and names.
But they are all the same Substance. Con-substantial.
Consubstantial - of one and the same substance, essence, or nature, especially the three divine persons of the Christian Trinity.
In other words, they are literally trying to extract "divinity" from children, because we are all Philosopher's Stones and Children are the most pure on account of their near-infinite potentiality.
They cannot succeed because only those who are Creators, who follow the Life of the Creator, and who Understand the Life of Jesus are able to make the Stone.
Evil cannot Create.
Jesus' Life is the Recipe, Ingredients, and Intent of the Philosopher's Stone. Only a complete understanding of His life can lead to Enlightenment.
John 14: Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
Even the Last Supper is an emulation of the process to create the Stone. Or, more accurately, the process to create the Stone is an emulation of the memory of the Last Supper.
You take Balanced Earth(Bread/Flesh) and Balanced Moisture(Wine/Blood) that you take from the Bounty of God, separate them, and then combine them in a Vessel(our bodies, Communion).
Do this in memory of me.
The memory is before Time. Jesus is literally saying that to commune with him, you must reenact his Birth, Death, and Rebirth.
That is how a Stone is made. That is how we join in Eternal Paradise, and attain true Immortality -- by means of inheritance of the Father; by means of God's Love for his Children.
Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto thee, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church: and the gates of hell shall not overcome it.
Ask me anything.
English translations don’t capture the depth of the statement. The Greek words for Peter’s name rock and the second use of rock are different. The second is petras which can be thought of as “bedrock”. Commentaries spend a lot of time discussing this verse because there is a lot to unpack.
If we are the bricks, and peter is the foundation/bedrock.
Then what is the World?
Jesus = World
Peter = Foundation
Bricks = Church
And when I mean World, I mean the whole Universe -- Uni = One, Verse = Word
John 1:1 - In the beginning was that Word, and that Word was with God, and that Word was God.
That’s one of the reasons this passage has been the subject of controversy and debate through the years. Let’s assume the bedrock in Mt 16:18 is Peter, then what Peter says in his letter is interesting:
Jesus is obviously the cornerstone in the passage cited from Isaiah because he is the one we believe in. Peter also writes about the church. Is this analogy relevant to Mt16:18? Where does Peter fit into this analogy? That’s one reason why the interpretations for the rock and bedrock are often debated.
Some schools of thought have Peter as the bedrock. Others don’t see that idea as the meaning of the Mt 16:18 (e.g., the bedrock is Christ as Lord, the confession of Christ, Mt. Hermon, etc.). It could be word play with double or triple entendre. I don’t know, but I find it fascinating.