The Native American's can do this because they are sovereign. We can do this because we are sovereign. The only difference is, the Native American's have been declared sovereign explicitly. We (the U.S., I have no idea bout Canada), by our constitution, have been declared sovereign implicitly.
By a couple centuries of fuckery we have been taught to not believe in our own sovereignty, and there are multiple layers of laws which reinforce that belief. The thing is, they are all unconstitutional, or they rely on amendments which were themselves unconstitutional (5th, 13th, 14th, 16th, off the top of my head).
Any law that takes away sovereignty of the individual goes directly against the implicit statements of sovereignty in the DoI and the constitution. But people don't get that. They don't believe it. They think they need to be subjects to the sovereign government. It was never intended to be that way. On the contrary, the social contract that was the Constitution was intended to never allow that to happen again.
But here's the trick. It doesn't matter what the laws or constitution say. It's irrelevant. If it is in violation of Natural Law which states explicitly that all entities are sovereign, then any law based on it is a fraud. All we have to do is declare our sovereignty by Natural Law and we win.
Of course they may disagree, and under fraudulently created laws they can potentially imprison us, but this is a power taken against Natural Law, and thus subjects them to punishment (disbandment) under Natural Law.
The way this is fought is by people understanding everything I just said, on a fundamental level. It is ignorance that gives them this power. They don't have it, except by our allowing it, and we allow it in our ignorance.
The Native American's can do this because they are sovereign. We can do this because we are sovereign. The only difference is, the Native American's have been declared sovereign explicitly. We (the U.S., I have no idea bout Canada), by our constitution, have been declared sovereign implicitly.
By a couple centuries of fuckery we have been taught to not believe in our own sovereignty, and there are multiple layers of laws which reinforce that belief. The thing is, they are all unconstitutional, or they rely on amendments which were themselves unconstitutional (5th, 13th, 14th, 16th, off the top of my head).
Any law that takes away sovereignty of the individual goes directly against the implicit statements of sovereignty in the DoI and the constitution. But people don't get that. They don't believe it. They think they need to be subjects to the sovereign government. It was never intended to be that way. On the contrary, the social contract that was the Constitution was intended to never allow that to happen again.
But here's the trick. It doesn't matter what the laws or constitution say. It's irrelevant. If it is in violation of Natural Law which states explicitly that all entities are sovereign, then any law based on it is a fraud. All we have to do is declare our sovereignty by Natural Law and we win.
Of course they may disagree, and under fraudulently created laws they can potentially imprison us, but this is a power taken against Natural Law, and thus subjects them to punishment (disbandment) under Natural Law.
The way this is fought is by people understanding everything I just said, on a fundamental level. It is ignorance that gives them this power. They don't have it, except by our allowing it, and we allow it in our ignorance.