Okay we’ve got to dig in. This is a big deal, if you’re Native American of course. But this can wreck the crown, as in bubye Queen and UK Control!! Hmmm, kinda 1776ish!
I find it fishy why the queen is minted on currency from canada, great britain, new zealand, and australia. They want it on our currency here - to complete "five eyes" control
Absolutely. She’s a spook and so is Boris’ missus. They’ve followed the same
Playbook pretty much. DL liaison with the target, then “romance” gets blown up publicity wise (they’re both media savvy) so the high profile blokes are out under media pressure to legitimise a casual relationship. Then lo ans behold a pregnancy (it was widely rumoured that the hurried royal wedding for H&M was because she was supposed to be expecting which was why another royal wedding was bumped to make way for it) and then a second in short order to seal the deal. Both wives have been politically active and vocal and linked to the Clintons and Epstein Maxwell nexus (look up Carrie Symonds connections to terra mar)
Yeah the guy in the video talks about how anyone born here doesn’t get their birth certificate application until weeks after they’re born. Therefore not being “registered” with the corporation until then. Which makes you a “native” or “national” of the land of Canada.
He says…
“This would make everyone born here an instant millionaire”
The Native American's can do this because they are sovereign. We can do this because we are sovereign. The only difference is, the Native American's have been declared sovereign explicitly. We (the U.S., I have no idea bout Canada), by our constitution, have been declared sovereign implicitly.
By a couple centuries of fuckery we have been taught to not believe in our own sovereignty, and there are multiple layers of laws which reinforce that belief. The thing is, they are all unconstitutional, or they rely on amendments which were themselves unconstitutional (5th, 13th, 14th, 16th, off the top of my head).
Any law that takes away sovereignty of the individual goes directly against the implicit statements of sovereignty in the DoI and the constitution. But people don't get that. They don't believe it. They think they need to be subjects to the sovereign government. It was never intended to be that way. On the contrary, the social contract that was the Constitution was intended to never allow that to happen again.
But here's the trick. It doesn't matter what the laws or constitution say. It's irrelevant. If it is in violation of Natural Law which states explicitly that all entities are sovereign, then any law based on it is a fraud. All we have to do is declare our sovereignty by Natural Law and we win.
Of course they may disagree, and under fraudulently created laws they can potentially imprison us, but this is a power taken against Natural Law, and thus subjects them to punishment (disbandment) under Natural Law.
The way this is fought is by people understanding everything I just said, on a fundamental level. It is ignorance that gives them this power. They don't have it, except by our allowing it, and we allow it in our ignorance.
No. It won’t go that way. Trust your people, the natives to act responsibly. We’ve already been told all we be better than it was before, after the win. Have faith Anon. Just remember to avoid electing an Andrew Jackson later.
Okay we’ve got to dig in. This is a big deal, if you’re Native American of course. But this can wreck the crown, as in bubye Queen and UK Control!! Hmmm, kinda 1776ish!
The "crown" is most likely referring to the Fractional Reserve Banking System headquartered in the autonomous territory known as the City of London.
I find it fishy why the queen is minted on currency from canada, great britain, new zealand, and australia. They want it on our currency here - to complete "five eyes" control
The Megan Markle thing was always fishy to me too. Like, so obviously fake drama. She's a sleeper agent here for some reason or another.
Absolutely. She’s a spook and so is Boris’ missus. They’ve followed the same Playbook pretty much. DL liaison with the target, then “romance” gets blown up publicity wise (they’re both media savvy) so the high profile blokes are out under media pressure to legitimise a casual relationship. Then lo ans behold a pregnancy (it was widely rumoured that the hurried royal wedding for H&M was because she was supposed to be expecting which was why another royal wedding was bumped to make way for it) and then a second in short order to seal the deal. Both wives have been politically active and vocal and linked to the Clintons and Epstein Maxwell nexus (look up Carrie Symonds connections to terra mar)
Um, except that they are their own country.
Theres a cool schottishy guy on canadian tire money
It's called crown land , have your mind blown.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_land
It's not just for natives. In the video she clearly says it's for those BORN in Canada.
Yeah the guy in the video talks about how anyone born here doesn’t get their birth certificate application until weeks after they’re born. Therefore not being “registered” with the corporation until then. Which makes you a “native” or “national” of the land of Canada.
He says… “This would make everyone born here an instant millionaire”
Well that’d be awesome for Canadian citizens of true
The Native American's can do this because they are sovereign. We can do this because we are sovereign. The only difference is, the Native American's have been declared sovereign explicitly. We (the U.S., I have no idea bout Canada), by our constitution, have been declared sovereign implicitly.
By a couple centuries of fuckery we have been taught to not believe in our own sovereignty, and there are multiple layers of laws which reinforce that belief. The thing is, they are all unconstitutional, or they rely on amendments which were themselves unconstitutional (5th, 13th, 14th, 16th, off the top of my head).
Any law that takes away sovereignty of the individual goes directly against the implicit statements of sovereignty in the DoI and the constitution. But people don't get that. They don't believe it. They think they need to be subjects to the sovereign government. It was never intended to be that way. On the contrary, the social contract that was the Constitution was intended to never allow that to happen again.
But here's the trick. It doesn't matter what the laws or constitution say. It's irrelevant. If it is in violation of Natural Law which states explicitly that all entities are sovereign, then any law based on it is a fraud. All we have to do is declare our sovereignty by Natural Law and we win.
Of course they may disagree, and under fraudulently created laws they can potentially imprison us, but this is a power taken against Natural Law, and thus subjects them to punishment (disbandment) under Natural Law.
The way this is fought is by people understanding everything I just said, on a fundamental level. It is ignorance that gives them this power. They don't have it, except by our allowing it, and we allow it in our ignorance.
Except, if they can do that, can they also kick modern day home and land owners out of Canada here too?
No. It won’t go that way. Trust your people, the natives to act responsibly. We’ve already been told all we be better than it was before, after the win. Have faith Anon. Just remember to avoid electing an Andrew Jackson later.
No good will come from electing Andrew Jackson.
Correct Anon. That’s why Canadians Must Be on guard from here on, just like we in the US Must.