Listen, I posted this 3 days ago and no one grabbed onto it. This 1999 military document completely lays out the tech for mRNA nano-biology and transhumanism mitochondrial micro-chipping. All approved by Bill Clinton. What is the white rubbery stuff morticians are finding in vax veins? Spider silk?!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
It's on an .mil site.
It's filed away with them.
That's what I meant.
That may be true, but you still have the same problem of no provenance. When it comes to information, the military is a bit like an encyclopedia: they will gather lots of stuff. This could be an informational report from the company referenced in the illustration (I looked them up; they have a lot of irons in the fire). There are huge differences in the military among what could be done, what can be done, what should be done, what might be done, what they want to do, what is being done, and what was done. Anybody remember the X-ray laser?
He's behind this paper submission.
The Executive Branch was fully aware of this and approved funding.
The Military naturally would have known about it as well, and that's why they archived it on their own servers.
It's an official document, and the technology is not make-believe. I don't mean to be coarse, but I simply don't see your point.
My "point" was a question. You claimed this was a military document and I was asking for any evidence of that fact. It has taken you two reveals to show that it was NOT a military document (White House product) and it only showed up in the military archives. It sort of goes without saying that work product of the White House Economic Council would be approved and funded by the President (Executive Branch), so that is not news. Why would the military "naturally" have known about this? Maybe as a matter of course it went into their archives (along with the Ark of the Covenant).
It is an "official" document of the sort that cannot be traced back from a stray page...which is poor document control, but I admit to high standards. Technology readiness is a multi-valued concept (ref. NASA and DoD Technology Readiness Levels). In 1935, Eugen Sanger proposed an "antipodal bomber" that would have been rocket propelled and capable of traveling halfway around the world. He had actually developed rocket propulsion technology superior to that used in the V-2 missile, so it was anything but "make-believe." But nothing has happened to advance the idea into practice in the intervening 85 years, despite several serious attempts. So, the idea could be "not make-believe" and still be a fruitless notion.
So, my point is more a matter of "What is your point?" What is the meaning of this purported document? It is merely a technocrat's vision of future possibilities---or is it a plan of action? Is it good or evil? Technology, per se, is seldom on that scale. It all depends on what is done with it. I've seen too much smoke tossed up in these pages to feel any need for concern about a stray page dealing with matters that are already under way in the private domain (per the company cited in the illustration).
If you had read the preface, it's the second document in a series.
The first one went over well, so they were tasked with drafting a second (this one) to show how to approach the technology commercially.
It wasn't memory holed like your "antipodal bomber" example.
If the White House asked for a follow up, then the research showed promise. This isn't just one of a thousand little scholarly projects that go nowhere. This is at the crux and heart of their transhumanist New World Order. Why should we assume to dismiss it as drivel?
The way I read it, this document is a bonafide stepping stone into the current mRNA gene altering technology likely in use in these "vaccines."
Ultimately, that's my point.
All the horrible things that we suspect these shots are is supported by this document. This is a good red-pill to sway normies that think "oh, that's just scifi movie stuff -- nanomachines aren't real!"
This document right here shows the technology has been most definitely "real" since 1999 at the latest.
I really don't know why you're confrontational, if you are at all. We are well past this just being a pipe-dream. DNA-Based Microchips, by this document, have already proven to be a working technology. We have every reason to assume, by this document and its citations alone, that they have implemented this in some form or fashion -- whether we know about it or not.
It's been 23 years since this info was compiled. Imagine where we are now. Do you really think they would have buried it considering all the strange nonsense we have been seeing out of these "vaccines"?