Let’s accelerate that process. Humanity awakening from its enslavement to allopathic medicine in a faster manner will shift the timeline forward such that we skip a lot of pain and suffering.
Indeed, the Global Cult agenda depends on this process being slowed as much as possible (since it is the nature of timeline dynamics that the awakening does occur; it’s not a matter of if; it’s when). The Global Cult is banking on keeping people brainwashed and thus easy to control and manipulate.
Spread this document. May not open in brave:
https://u1lib.org/book/17573423/2c377f
And then this:
https://book4you.org/book/5418297/958a07 What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong Dawn Lester, David Parker
I am happy to answer any questions.
Herein lies the rub of the discussion. You are asking downstream questions and you've determined to ignore the UPSTREAM question. This is the whole point of doctors Kaufman, Cowan, Lanka, Bailey assertions.
All of them have PROVED that no scientist has ever actually demonstrated the existence of any virus. The only thing virologists ever do is kill monkey cells and take pictures of particles of their cell debris and then call them "viruses". This is quite literally, the entire field of virology.
To add insult to injury, these virologists then claim that they cannot harvest any viruses out of a sick person's bodily fluids. One esteemed Yale virologist even claimed you can't find any viruses in the bronchial fluid of 10,000 sick people presumably having the same dis-ease - TEN THOUSAND samples!!! While on the other hand, you're told that when you're sick, you can cough/sneeze/breathe-out BILLIONS Of viruses, only one tiny minute particle of which can be inhaled by one of your family members and make them sick. Bwahahahaha!!!
And if that wasn't enough, thousands of us have researched the annals of medical and scientific experiments around attempting to demonstrate HUMAN-TO-HUMAN transmission of these viruses (and alleged bacterial infection too). We've found about a dozen thus far. All failed MISERABLY in transmitting a dis-ease from a sick to healthy person. They tried with "Spanish flu", polio, small pox, and a host of others including influenza. It appears the scientific community gave up even trying to do this in the 1950s, right around the time they invented the fraudulent "viral culturing" method of poisoning monkey kidney cells.
The virologists are now INVENTING viruses for the past 25 years, using software to randomly assemble fragmented RNA found in a single sick person's bronchial fluids. They did EXACTLY THIS from a single sample of a dead Wuhan man alleged to die of this "new mysterious dis-ease". They didn't find one single intact, whole "Coronavirus" in his bronchial fluid. They casually stitched together 10,000 tiny chunks of RNA (which was 100% his human RNA), while ignoring 20,000 other chunks that they claimed were "likely human in origin" into a pattern they invented out of thin air, all on their computers. The "in silico" virus was born. Can you not see this is nonsense?
A woman in Canada has been sending out FOIA requests to every health agency around the world asking them if they any evidence or samples of an actual "coronvirus" (SARS-COV2 specifically). She's had over 184 responses, including from the CDC/NIH, and none claim to have a sample.
There's a $1.5 million reward being offered to anybody that can come forward with an actual physical sample of SARS-COV2. No takers thus far.
In 2015, Dr. Stefan Lanka (a former virologist) challenged the world to produce any paper demonstrating proof of the measles virus offering a 100,000 Euro reward. Not a single virologist, immunologist, biologist or epidemiologist showed up to claim the money. And to wit, all of virology is based on the seminal 1954 Enders scientific paper for the measles virus, having invented the poisoning of the green monkey kidney cell (vero cells) "viral culturing" process. This is why Dr. Lanka chose the measles virus. Every "proof" that viruses exist today is based on the Enders viral culturing method.
John Enders did in fact run a CONTROL EXPERIMENT in his "breakthrough" 1954 measles viral culturing experiment. In it, he skipped the part where you're supposed to add the sick person's bodily fluids. which PRESUMABLY contain the "virus" itself, and simply went through the process of dousing the monkey kidney cells with POISON (aka "anti-biotics" --- "against-life"). And what did he find and write in his paper for all to see? That the results of the control experiment were INDISTINGUISHABLE from the primary experiment that included the human bodily fluids. Let that sink in. The so-called "Cytopahtic effect" (fancy word for death of tissue/cells) happened in both cases and one could not be distinguished from the other. Dr. Lanka ran the same experiment last summer, perfectly matching what Enders found. And yet, Ender's findings was completely ignored by the entire scientific community. Strange, no? And nobody since Enders has bothered to run any control experiments since for all the kajillions of "brand new viruses" that have been "discovered" since then. Even stranger, wouldn't you say?
Louis Pastuer admitted in his private diaries that the very public "anthrax" experiment that he became globally famous for, that he actually used his much-maligned veterinarian competitor's own "vaccine formula" instead of his own, as his was killing more than 50% of the sheep he tested it on. He went on to castigage, defame and berate his competitor, ruining his career, as he himself was lifted up as the great savior of mankind by the public. Pasteur also made-up all his results for his so-called "rabies vaccine", twisting figures, eliminating vaccine recipients for up to 14-days after their last round of painful rabies shots, as they were dying in droves. Further, whether or not a dog/animal had rabies was entirely up to the subjective opinion of the great doctor Pasteur. If somebody was bitten by a dog/animal and lived without getting Pasteur's toxic nostrum, then the dog/animal "didn't have rabies" according to Pasteur. And if a person died after getting Pasteur's nostrum (beyond 14 days), they were either "too late" or the bites received by the patient were "too damaging" and they were said to have really died of advanced infections or sepsis.
"Viruses" were theoretical all through Pasteur's career and well into the 1930s after the invention of the electron microscope. After scientists could see smaller particles for the first time, which "viruses" were theorized to be, they spent the next decade trying to isolate them as well as attempting to follow the very simple "Koch's Postulates" by giving these particles found in a sick person's bodily fluids to healthy people. After all these attempts failed miserably in the 1940s and early 1950s, we got the Enders experiment listed above.
Now, if you're not interested in understanding all these very simple FACTS, like it appears the majority aren't, then I can only ascribe this to you being trapped in your brainwashing. And I'm not saying that to offend you. I want you to look and see this, acknowledge this must be the case if you find nothing that I've said compelling or satisfactory to your inquiry.
Every single possible piece of UPSTREAM EVIDENCE suggests that there is no such thing as "viruses".
The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from all of the above is that there MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE going on. Wouldn't you agree?
For starters, there isn't one single answer. The very convenient "one bug, one drug" mainstream narrative has conditioned us into thinking in a very particular, albeit incorrect way.
What's blatantly missing is the power of our minds. Not that this is the one and only explanation for all dis-eases and situations. What you're asking about resembles what we call "the flu" today. This is really a catch-all term to describe general malaise, mucous membrane irritation, fever, diarrhea, vomiting, etc. Albeit, it would seem even within the household, each person doesn't always display all the identical symptoms, duration nor severity of the illness.
I've worked with over a dozen people who claimed to "have Covid". No two had even remotely identical experiences aside from being energetically flattened. Some for only 2-3 days, others lasted several months. Other than that, no two identically shared symptoms. There was some similarity and crossover, but hardly any way you could scientifically conclude "exact same thing happened to both/all".
I believe that what is happening with "Covid" is something new and unique in the annals of known history. It is the releasing of long-held and repressed negative feeling/emotion that is coming to the surface. In this case however, said feelings/emotions are myriad, having no single commonality across the board, which explains the wide variety of symptoms, intensities and durations. And this hypothesis also makes sense as the normal releasing/allowing of these feelings to arise very specifically explains the dis-eases that claim the most lives - e.g. cancer, heart disease, heart failure, lower respiratory illness, etc. And each of these have very specific, tell-tale symptoms when they are overcome. Death occurs when they are not overcome.
And the cause for this, which I constantly get poo-poo'd on for, is greater amounts of light arriving on the planet. As Q would say "Dark to Light". This is why "nothing can stop what is coming", because it is the light shining in heretofore hidden, dark places. Said light is pushing away the debris in our bodies.
The practice of yoga, which is much, much more than just physical stretching, also produces these types of results when regularly done. The yogis/gurus know full well that humans store unresolved traumas within the physical body. In time, the practice of stretching yoga enables these to be released without having to deal with these emotions consciously. In a way, it allows for a merciful release. I believe the constellations of symptoms known as "Covid" is effectively doing the same.
Now, onto "the flu". As mentioned, I don't all so-called "flus" can be explained away by one explanation. However, there seem to be some commonalities we can agree on. First, that a change in the weather seems to trigger the onset of them usually. Likewise, a change in humidity and barometric pressure. Flu season in the northern latitudes is different from flu season in the southern latitudes, and likewise from the tropical regions (monsoon season). What all these latitudes do have in common is very similar humidity and barometric pressure when flu season hits the masses.
So it does appear that there is some reason certain people cannot gracefully adapt to these changes. Is there just "one reason"? I highly doubt it. Typically, when a person gets a fever, the rise in bodily temperature is causing the body to excrete/expel something from it. Call it a toxin, a poison, something unwanted. Again, it can't just be "one thing".
I also believe flus are related to our lack of exposure to the natural world - fresh air, connection to the earth, sunshine, etc. All of these elements serve to detox us in so many ways. They also serve to maintain an electrical balance, an ionic balance in the body.
Now, why does everybody in the family get this at the same time? Well to be fair, you've only had rare experiences of this, as have most of us. MOST of the time, this does not happen. Only one of you gets sick. It's rare that all or the majority in the household all get sick at the same time. You're simply remember "that one time" it happened.
I theorize that in addition to all of the factors mentioned above, you and your family members also intimately share common environmental inputs. Living quarters, food supply, water supply, air supply, psychic factors, stressors, common outlook, and perhaps most importantly, a shared vibrational rate (otherwise, you couldn't stand to be around each other).
Taking all of the above into consideration, seeing your wife being to rebalance/detox (getting the flu) signals your body to check and see if it would be in your best interests to do the same, to maintain your familial balance and homeostasis. This is effectively the explanation around "exosomes", since you follow Kaufman you're likely familiar.
Exosomes do precisely this within our bodies, they are exchangers of information between cells. They've been quite easily proven to exist, have been truly isolated, purified and characterized, as well as visualized. And as luck would have it, they're INDISTINGUISHABLE from so-called phantom "viruses"...hmmmm?
While the predominant medical pedagogy insist exosomes operate only "intra-body", how big of a stretch would it be to presume these are indeed passed from one body to the next, signaling those around you of a potential threat, a toxin needing to be eliminated, etc.?
I believe this is as a viable explanation. I further argue that this is why you don't seem to "spread your dis-ease" to a stranger, neighbor or co-worker very often.
But none of these explanations can hold a candle to the power of the mind. Psychosomatic disorders are widely acknowledged. Hypochondria is a very real thing. The placebo and nocebo effects have been scientifically documented as both real and highly powerful again, again and again.
The very IDEA, running through your mind, that "I might catch the flu from my family member" sets off an immediate mental program that can quite easily lead to experiencing it physically. Likewise, putting this thought into the minds of your kids plants the seeds as well. See any similarities with what the media and government have been trying to do to the masses lately?
I believe most dis-eases are indeed psychosomatic in origin. Carcinogens are completely a lie. Metastases is completely a lie. Clogged arteries is completely a lie. Heredity and genetics are <mostly> a lie (rare exceptions). Environmental causes are <mostly> a lie. Food/Nutrition/Diet is <mostly> a lie (unless the diet is just atrocious of course) There's literally no "proof" of any of these things causing cancers, heart disease, heart attacks, lung diseases, kidney diseases, etc. It's all theory, all supposition when you get down to the brass tacks.
As such, I believe the reason "the flu" SPREADS amongst family members is very commonly a result of mental worry/fear/anxiety. I also assert that it is rare when the whole family gets it simultaneously. And when only one person gets the flu, it is for the purpose of toxin removal, electrical rebalancing and general re-alignment to changes in the environment that the body was unable to gracefully adjust to.
Unfortunately, I do not have a 70 trillion dollar budget to prove all this definitively. I have spent years studying this subject and these seem to be the very best explanations that I have arrived at.
It is much easier for me to tell you EXACTLY what causes each different type of cancer, certain heart diseases, pneumonia, tuberculosis, hemorrhoids, herpes, kidney stones, etc. as these are very precise dis-eases with precise symptoms, when properly diagnosed and documented (which they aren't always).
But "the flu" is really indicative of a myriad of symptoms where it's rare that multiple people present in precisely the same way beyond simply "not feeling well" and having a fever.
And finally, when a whole household "comes down with the flu", one should never discount the even more obvious potential cause which could very well be either food, water or air poisoning of some sort which very frequently goes undetected thanks to the dominant "germ" narrative that saturates our awareness today.
That's quite a surprise . You must have a close family and very commonly-shared beliefs if so. Dare I say, you're all "expecting it" may very well explain this situation, which is the exception, not the rule in my experience.
Correct and the most likely explanation.
Indeed. Never underestimate the power of belief and expectations
All illnesses start first with a sympathetic response. We call this the "cold phase" - cold hands, feet, lack of appetite, chills, difficulty sleeping, mind racing. Usually this is the extent of it. What establishment medicine fails to understand is that coupled with sympathetic phase is the vagotonia phase that follows sometime later - the hot phase. Sometimes this is mere hours, sometimes it arrives after years, possibly decades in terms of so-called "allergies", which are indeed find their origin in a psychosomatic reaction to an unexpected event. The ongoing so-called "allergy" recurring is a rejection of the resolution which would allow the vagatonia to complete itself. All this being said, it's the "same dis-ease". So if modern medicine defines say 10,000 different diseases, the truth is, there are only 5000 unique dis-eases that involves both the sympathetic and vagatonic phases.
I would tend to agree. A pure artist is tuned into different realms/dimensions which is where they derive their "gifts" from.
True, however I think it has much more to do with the duration and intensity of the rejected feelings/emotions that are stored in the body. Said another way, the more severe the trauma that has been repressed, as well as the duration of time that has elapsed are better indicators of the intensity of the "Covid symptoms" IMHO. Simply put, a repressed childhood trauma would lead to far more intense covid symptoms than say something that happened to a middle-aged adult 1,2, 5 or even 10 years ago. That's not a hard and fast rule as the intensity of the trauma certainly bears the most weight, but merely an example of what I'm suggesting.
You are correct. Lyme's disease, is falsely attributed to a tick bite and bacteria. However, all "chronic dis-ease" has at its origin, an UNEXPECTED event/shock/trauma that catches you off guard, and, as such, leaves you unprepared to gracefully deal with it in that moment. You can trace the onset of any dis-ease, like lymes, to just such an event. You will have gone through the sympathetic symptoms, the "cold phase", and will spend at least a few days with thoughts of the event racing through your mind, but unable to arrive at a solution/resolution to the situation you faced. It is some time after this, that the symptoms of a "chronic disease" begin to appear. For something like lymes, it would likely be days/weeks after. For something like an organ cancer, it could be many years before a tumor is discovered.
Lyme's is a tricky dis-ease to deal with as symptoms vary widely amongst patients, because we are dealing with many different "dis-eases" in this case. However, the onset of lyme's can typically be traced back to a "separation conflict" traumatic event. And this can go many ways. It could be related to either an unwanted physical separation, as well as a psychological separation. And likewise, the onset of what is known as "Lymes" can also be triggered by you WANTING to be separated from someone, but being unable to do so.
What is fairly common following a Lyme's diagnosis in many patients is that it leads to an "Existence conflict" trauma, in which the patient is fearful that that "life as they once knew it" may never return, thus threatening their once comfortable "existence". A whole new host of symptoms arise accordingly. And then from this, many other conflicts can and do arise, all of which get bundled under the moniker "lyme's disease" as establishment medicine has virtually no explanation for virtually any dis-ease that is accurate.
It should be fairly easy to understand that if lymes was caused by a bacteria, a stout round of anti-biotics every time there was a "flare up" would take care of the symptoms anyway. But anti-biotics (against-life) only serve to exacerbate the underlying issue, preventing vagatonia (healing) and at best, suppressing symptoms for a short while.
And yes, to answer your question, by attending a "Lymes support group", one is re-affirming their apparently helpless situation. This would be highly counterproductive from a psychological standpoint and only serve to strengthen your awareness of "being sick".
In order to really wrap your head around what I'm saying, you literally need to see dis-ease in a completely different way for starters. Not as something to shun, not as something to "get rid of", not as something to "fight" and "eliminate" at all costs. This mindset is so completely counterproductive as to be literally insane. And yet, this is what we are taught by "the experts" and is dominant in our western cultural indoctrination.
Every single dis-ease you've experienced actually has a purpose to maintain your survival. Said purpose is to protect, defend, enhance, improve the ability of the body to survive a perceived threat/problem/conundrum/difficulty. Our psyche is primitive in origin and does not relate to the world in the same way as our egos (personalities) do. To the psyche, there is no past, no future, only HERE and NOW exist for it. It reacts to the mental machinations of the ego as if the threat is a REAL and PRESENT danger. And as such, the psyche goes into action to protect the body from the perceived threat.
And I should add "Psyche" is really not a good word to be used as it carries nothing but negative connotations now - e.g. "Psychotic", "Psychopath" "Psychophant", "Psychological disorder" etc. The word has been "negatized" as I like to say. The Greeks used the word originally and it declared the psyche to be "the seat of the soul". Thus a high, noble position in our makeup. As such, a much more accurate word I like to use when talking with people is to say "Soul-Somatic", which I feel conveys a much more accurate and representative meaning, as it is the "soul" that truly operates the body and this is what the great artist is far more in tune and harmony with, using your example about artists.
How is this resonating with you? It's a lot to take in I realize. Stepping into the realm of vibration and energy is a much larger step outside the mainstream paradigm and I hesitate to dive into it unless there is some degree of understanding with the physical/matter explanation first, along with a light "dusting" of the "soul" stuff. :)
Perhaps the most difficult part of this is realizing that western medicine hasn't trained its physicians to find causes for diseases, and it would seem, whenever possible, finds a way to keep us partially healthy, but never fully, until we reach retirement age. This appears to be the case based on my research. It's perhaps the "toughest pill to swallow".
So let me know what you think about what I've said above when you have time to digest it and what questions you may have.