We are now seeing the criminal globalists attempting to pivot from "Covid will kill everybody" to "Covid will cause HIV, which will cause AIDS, which will kill everybody -- but it's definitly not the vaccines that caused any of this harm, so take your vaxx."
So, I wanted to create a thread of a post I wrote in another thread. This way, I can reference this thread in the future, and others here can debate this subject.
My initial research into HIV/AIDS led me to conclude that HIV was real, but it did not cause AIDS, because AIDS is nothing more than a made-up definition, and not a real physical syndrome.
Later, I discovered that people were saying HIV also is not real (does not exist).
Now, I have concluded that all viruses are made-up fantasies, because virologists ALL use a method to "study a virus" that is not valid.
We know that PCR is a technique, and is not something that can diagnose any illness. Likewise, nobody has ever actually seen a virus, captured a virus to study, or studied a virus. What they are looking at are cellular fragments of poisoned cells in a lab (not in a person), and everything else from there is pure speculation, not scientific at all.
Regarding HIV/AIDS, it is helpful to understand the history of how things have progressed over the past 50 years.
AIDS - Originally to Explain Gay Illnesses
AIDS does not exist as a real thing in the real world. Instead, it is just a definition, which is used to create fear in the public and money into the bank accounts of the fraud promoters.
In the 1970's, gay men in San Francisco were getting weird illnesses, some of them died. Michael Gottlieb (a Fauci co-conspirator) came up with the term GRID ("Gay-Related Immune Deficiency") as an explanation. There was NO scientific research to base this on. It was just a guess.
They tried to get grant money to "study" this thing (that did not really exist), but they came up empty because nobody wanted to spend money to help out the fags in San Fran.
So, they changed the name to AIDS ("Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome"). They claimed that anyone could get it (not just homosexuals). AGAIN, they had absolutely NO scientific evidence for this. It was just a made-up claim.
"HIV Causes AIDS" -- a Claim With No Science Behind It
Robert Gallo invented the "smoking gun." This is what changed everything. He claimed that he discovered that HIV was a virus that caused AIDS. The media went crazy with it, and the public panicked. Now, everybody could get a deadly illness just by having sex.
The money poured in, and Anthony Fauci was the ringleader for this scam.
At this point, they started doing HIV tests. And those tests were bogus. They could NOT diagnose anything. Kary Mullis spoke out against using the PCR technique as a diagnostic tool for HIV. But they continued doing it.
AIDS is nothing more than a definition. IF (a) you have one of 30+ illnesses listed by the CDC, AND (b) you test positive for HIV (with a bogus test), THEN you are diagnosed with AIDS.
If you have the illness but test negative, then you "just" have the illness, but not AIDS.
There is NO scientific research to prove this. NONE.
Robert Gallo would later state on the record that he NEVER had any proof. It was ONLY an hypothesis.
But the money rolled in.
So, what is the TRUTH?
The Truth About HIV/AIDS
The truth is those homos in San Francisco were part of the new "free love" movement that was sweeping the country in the 1960's/1970's. They were the gay subculture of it.
They created bath houses to have casual sex in. But their kind of sex is unnatural, so they used drugs to relax the anal muscles. They used Amyl Nitrate ("poppers") which turned out to be highly toxic to humans.
Plus, they were using recreational drugs to party for days at a time without going to sleep.
This "gay lifestyle" is what caused their bodies to build up with toxins, and they developed all sorts of nasty illnesses. Some of them died.
The Drugs Killed the AIDS Patients
Once the false "HIV causes AIDS" story became the narrative, they would test people for HIV. If they were positive (using a bogus test), and if they also had one of those 30+ illnesses listed by CDC, then they were diagnosed as having "AIDS."
They were then put onto "AIDS drugs" like AZT, which was a failed chemo drug. AZT is EXTREMELY toxic.
Cancer patients are given toxic drugs for a LIMITED time period to kill off cancer cells. But AIDS patients were put on these drugs FOREVER. These drugs killed them.
That's why they eventually stopped using these highly toxic drugs. It was too obvious what was really going on.
And once this was all figured out, AIDS just "went away."
There was a time when people were in fear of having sex. Now, nobody really even thinks about AIDS.
Until now ... because they have recently attempted to bring back the fear porn for HIV.
Just like Fauci led the fake scam of HIV/AIDS (and controlled the $$$$$), he has been leading the fake scam of SARS/Covid. Now that they have maxed out what they can to get everyone taking the fake Covid vaccines, they are pivoting to HIV, to scare more people into taking what will be the fake HIV vaccines.
They are pivoting to "Covid causes HIV, which causes AIDS, which causes serious illnesses -- because it's definitly not the fake vaccines that caused all those sudden illnesses, that did not exist before the fake vaccines were unleashed."
Get it?
Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR, explaining how he realized that there is no science behind the "HIV causes AIDS" scam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnFAvKJe9VE
"House of Numbers" is the best documentary I have ever seen about the history of HIV/AIDS, and why the "scientists" cannot answer very basic questions. It was done more than 10 years ago, before Covid, and you will see a lot of the Covid players in it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k7168G95ecNT/
The 2021 research that proves that NO viruses exist:
https://rumble.com/vtd2cf-cov-myths-exposed-scientists-prove-sars-cov-2-cov-dont-exist.html
What [They] are Planning Next
They have recently changed the PCR "diagnostic" they are using. They have not done away with PCR; they are just changing the inputs. It is still not a diagnostic tool, but is being used as a diagnostic tool.
The plan is to make the claim that you just take one "test" and you get multiple results. You can be "diagnosed positive" for Covid, HIV, Herpes, and anything else they want to dream up. But no matter what, you WILL be postiive for something, even though you have no signs of sickness at all. Unless, of course, you are a good little lemming/slave and do not rock the boat.
This is to get the mRNA vaxx into your body. Injecting everyone at ALL COST is the goal.
Why?
There are no good reasons why, only bad reasons.
Slyver --
1 of 2:
My point is this:
Therefore ...
NONE of that has EVER been done with ANY virus in the history of virology.
Larry Corey, head of NIH Covid vaccine trials, said in 11/20/20, "“The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.”
That's kind of a big deal. The burden of proof is on he who makes the positive assertion (in this case, that the vaccines prevent transmission). They didn't even look at that.
Guess why? Because NO virus has ever been proven to cause transmission of ANY virual illness. They tried to prove it with the Spanish Flu, and could not. It seems that since then, they stopped trying.
There are now more than 100 institutions around the world (FDA, CDC, NIH, foriegn versions of these, university labs who study viruses, etc.) who have stated on the record that they have NO SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS, ISOLATED FROM ANYTHING ELSE, in their labs, they know of NO lab anywhere in the world that does, and they know of NO PAPER by anyone, anywhere who has demonstrated this.
In a previous thread, I'm pretty sure that you, Slyver, posted a link as a rebuttal to me on this issue, where you claimed that a sample of SARS-CoV-2 could be purchased.
But what it seemed to me that you failed to comprehend was that the link you posted was for a MIXTURE of genetic materials, whereby it was CLAIMED that the virus was "in there."
This is the fundamental point that so many people are missing (including trained virologists): There is NO VIRUS in any test tube or petrie dish anywhere in the world ... that is not ALSO MIXED IN WITH OTHER GENTIC MATERIAL (monkey kidney cells, etc.).
This is THE ONLY WAY that virologists study "viruses."
This is not true for bacteria or other microorganisms -- ONLY viruses.
And it is NOT PROOF of anything, when they are NOT studying ONLY the things they claim to be studying (i.e. a "virus").
This is THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE that you continue to evade and dance around.
There was a time when EVERYBODY (in the "scientific community," such as it was) believed -- REALLY BELIEVED -- that the Sun revolved around the Earth.
EVERYBODY who was anybody believed it. They imprisoned Galileo for claiming otherwise. That is how strong their belief was -- and how universal it was.
But they were ... WRONG.
The same thing is going on TODAY, in the 21st century, when it comes to virology.
Virologists are uniformly of a BELIEF, and that belief is ... NOT BASED ON SCIENCE ... and it is ... WRONG.
OF COURSE, you believe that ALL virologists canNOT possibly be wrong. Of course, you believe it. So did I ... until I looked into what the other side was saying. BTW, that "other side" includes medical doctors, biologists, and one brave virologist who was willing to question the fundamental assumptions that ALL of modern virology is based on -- which is (a) Germ Theory (Pasteur), and (b) the Enders/Pebble paper from 1954.
As a side note, it appears that Louis Pasteur was a snake oil salesman/con man. He LIED about his various experiments, and documented his lies in his diary. But that's a side issue.
Again, you are missing the point. FIRST, you have to prove that they ARE virons. Which means: FIRST, you have to prove that viruses are REAL, and not cellular debris. NOBODY has ever done that.
Virologists say there is "not enough virus" in a bodily sample to "find the virus in it." The head of Wuhan's Virology lab said it. He said you couldn't even find "enough virus" if you had fluids from 10,000 people mixed together.
Question: Then HOW THE HELL DO VIROLOGISTS THINK THEY FIND IT?
Answer: They MIX the bodily sample with OTHER GENETIC MATERIAL, and then ... THEY POISON THE CELLS ...and when the cells die, as they must, the PROCLAIM IT WAS THE VIRUS "IN THERE" THAT DID IT.
ALL of those photos you are looking at are AFTER the "virus" was (a) mixed with OTHER GENETIC MATERIAL, (b) poisoned, and (c) then the CREATION of those things you see in the photos appear.
Those photos were NOT taken of something that was in the human body to begin with. They were CREATED by the PROCESS that virologists use (100% of the time, they use ONLY this process).
How do I KNOW this? Because virologist Stefan Lanka PROVED it -- but YOU do not want to look at that evidence, do you?
All of these "markers" and "surrogates" are COP OUTS.
Because virlogists cannot do the BASIC experiment to isolate and purify this thing they CLAIM exists, they make up all sorts of excuses to justify their belief.
That is EXACTLY what the "Sun revolves around the Earth" crowd did. It is scientific cowardace, because it does NOT follow the Scientific Method.
WE KNOW that ALL virologists use the SAME process to "isolate" a virus, which is NOT true isolation (it is MIXED with OTHER genetic material).
THEFORE, ALL of those points you are trying to make about the various surrogates and markers (i.e. cop outs for doing the real thing) are NOT VALID ... scientifically.
You could also just claim to sprinkle some magic fairy dust over the "virus" and its mixed-in-with genetic materials, and call it a day. It would be just as scientific to do so.
No, you have not, because that is NOT what virologists do.
You are ASSUMING that virologists somehow "find the virus in there," then pull it out, and then go through the process by fractionation, etc.
That is NOT what happens in those labs.
Every point you are making is about what they do AFTER the INITIAL PROCESS to "isolate" a virus.
What you are missing is that virologists have CHANGED THE DEFINITION of the word "isolate," and they use that term to mean something DIFFERENT than what it means to everyone else.
Here (again) is how it works:
(1) They take a bodily fluid from someone who has symptoms of illness.
(2) They MIX THAT FLUID with OTHER THINGS that HAVE THEIR OWN GENETIC MATERIAL.
(3) They SPREAD this mixture on VERO CELLS (i.e. monkey kidney cells) WHICH HAVE THEIR OWN GENETIC MATERIAL.
(4) Then, they STARVE the cells of nutrients.
(5) Then, the POISON the cells with antibiotics that are SPECIFICALLY TOXIC TO KIDNEY CELLS.
(6) If nothing happens (which is what happened in the original experiments), then they ADD MORE TOXINS.
(7) Eventually, the kidney cells DIE ... which they MUST do, because they are given enough poisons to make that happen.
(8) THEN ... (AND ONLY THEN) ... the virologist declares that it was the VIRUS that killed the kidney cells -- completely IGNORING the FACT that he poisoned the cells with toxins that are designed to kill kidney cells.
THAT is the ENTIRE PROCESS that 100% of virologists use 100% of the time, as the FIRST STEP in "isolating a virus" ... and THEN they go on to do all the things you mention.
AFTER that process is completed, then you can fractionate or do anything you want to the cellular debris that is left over, and it means NOTHING ... because there is NO PROOF that there was ever a REAL VIRUS in there in the first place.
Stefan Lanka PROVED this by doing a CONTROL experiment (which NO other virologist had EVER done in the past 70 years of virology) ... and he got the SAME RESULT when he started with NO fluid from any human.
I challenged you to explain THAT in a previous post ... but you instead IGNORED it.
Don't ignore it anymore.
It is the SUM TOTAL of my position. Everything else you are doing is just using red herring and straw man arguments, which evade the real point.
You are wrong. Plain and simple, you are wrong.
Dude, YOU are the one who posted a link for a SARS-CoV-2 sample that a lab could purchase ... and it said it was VERO CELLS.
WTF do you think VERO CELLS are? They are monkey kidney cells.
They ALSO use other genetic material, such as human fetal lung cells from a culture that was started 50 years ago.
What you CONTINUE TO MISS HERE is ... they MIX these materials WITH the thing they claim is a "virus" and then the claim that is "isolation."
Do yourself a favor: Look up the definition of "isolate." It does NOT mean to mix in with a bunch of other stuff.
No, dude, you have it wrong.
YOU are not a virologist, so you ASSUME that virology works the same as other science.
IT DOES NOT.
Virology is built on fundamental building blocks that are FALSE.
The testing they do is as I described it. ALL of their testing is done this way. They claim it is the ONLY way they can do it.
Judy Mikovitz, a virologist who claims she isolated HIV, was challenged by Andy Kaufman in a Zoom call, and she admitted that this is what she did, because as she stated, it is the ONLY way it can be done.
She has blinders on. She THINKS she is "isolating" the HIV virus, when in fact she is NOT.
You should watch the first video I linked in my OP. It is Kary Mullis explaining how he realized that "HIV causes AIDS" and no scientific backing whatsoever.
He, too, was NOT a virologist. He was a chemist, and he was helping out a virology lab. He ASSUMED (like you do) that virologists must have worked out the "HIV causes AIDS" claim via serious reserach.
He discovered this was not true. There was NO such research. NONE.
Likewise, there has NEVER been ANY virus isolated and purified, in the true sense of what those words mean, even though it is done routinely for bacteria and other microorganism.
Nicely done. Slyver is clearly new to this debate, which to those who are unaware has been raging since the early days of "HIV." "Scientists" these days have been indoctrinated in the new science of purification where you basically do the opposite and drown it in jargon, computer algorithms and a myriad of supercilious nonsense until no one knows which way is up. They sneer at Koch's postulates and other such old science that would easily pull the rug out. If Slyver is actually wondering what isolation and purification would look like to one of these old time scientists, the so called Perth Group has detailed this ad nauseum: http://www.theperthgroup.com/. The general idea is there must be a "gold standard" of isolated and purified "virus," using the classic methods of centrifuge, EM characterization, etc. Otherwise, the genome you are calling "the virus" may be something else entirely and you must resort to inference or guesswork. You further must show that it and IT ALONE can cause sickness. Otherwise there is unlimited potential for fraud and all manner of shenanigans, aka, "Virology." This is why the manufacturers of PCR tests will admit in the fine print that they do not start from said "gold standard" when sourcing the respective genetic material for replication (unfortunately without such a gold standard, we have no idea what is actually being replicated) That way if the house of cards ever falls, the blame has been shifted up the pyramid. "We used the best available commercial material, it's not our fault no one ever isolated or purified." Have you not wondered how these "viruses" can be both abundant enough to cause illness and require HAZMAT suits while at the same time being too difficult to get enough of a sample from a sick person to run a simple isolation experiment? You can't have it both ways. If we all had to wear masks to prevent the virus from spreading it stands to reason that it should be easy enough to get some mucus, run it in a centrifuge, draw material out of the band where the "virus" would be if it was there and see what you see under EM. The virus research community has somehow accepted through groupthink and peculiar reasoning that this is somehow unnecessary. Why bother, the computer software can assemble the puzzle into more grant money. And there is the crux: no official source will ever fund a gold standard experiment, and dissenters can't afford a centrifuge and EM. Also, lets be honest, even if they ran 100 trials and found no virus every time, few would hear about it and even fewer would care. The virus scam was more or less designed to be unfalsifiable, with top down funding and authority, proprietary materials and equipment, high security labs, and gleeful crushing of all opposition (just ask Peter Duesberg). You would think it would give a well meaning researcher pause when they find themselves defending an edifice constructed by the likes of Gallo and Fauci. Its amazing how much self delusion can arise from the strange alchemy of student debt and ego involvement. Publish or Perish. And no journal is going to publish anything that truly threatens the golden goose. More significantly, they are much too smart to have been fooled. The first Tarot card is the fool for good reason. You must first see yourself as the fool before you can walk the path of knowledge.
Excellent post.
I don't know how many people are still checking out this thread, but you stated it well.
A very interesting thing to do is watch that 2nd link I posted in my OP for the "House of Numbers" video. Fast forward through and only watch the Q&A for the "experts" who are interviewed (including Fauci, Gallo, and virologists). They often refuse to answer, and when they do, it is always double talk and evasive non-answers.
If they were honest people, they would just answer the question simply and clearly. But as you said, they have created a complex weave of obfuscation to the point that there is no such thing as a straight-forward answer from anyone. In most cases, they get either angry or arrogant that anyone would dare question their fundamental premeses.
Like Slyver, they ASSUME things without evidence. And that leads to nothing but error and evasiveness.