GOLD shall destroy FED.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (331)
sorted by:
Some of us understand the tech, that's why.
If you did, you’d know there are no processors, no OSs, no software (including that written by Satoshi Nakamoto) and no encryption that you can trust. There are also no auditors of open source software you can trust and let’s be honest, you’re not auditing shit yourself.
In God we trust > in computers we trust
That's a straw-man. No one is saying don't trust in God. I'm a 5 point reformed Baptist. My church never closed or had a mandate during all this. How bout yours? The subject is currency, not faith.
You clearly don't understand distributed ledger technology. Hacking it doesn't require hacking one system or server. It requires hacking ALL nodes running on multiple OS's or strait mining machines without an OS throughout the world AT THE SAME TIME in less time than it takes to close a black. And that's just BTC and Eth for example.
I've been in computer IT and security since the 90's. Blockchain tech is the future which is why the government is so against it.
"In God we trust" is a phrase that us "metals are money" types use to encapsulate our basis for trusting in the rarity of our preferred metals. Such a system cannot be gamed by anyone under any possible set of circumstances, because God himself limited the quantity of these metals in the universe. I wasn't accusing you of atheism.
I'm not talking about hacking the ledger. That's not needed. If bitcoins became money and the cabal wanted bitcoins, they wouldn't have to hack anything. They already have the back doors to AES256 and all other such algorithms. They can instantaneously "mine" what they need without even expending hardly any energy.
Those same backdoors obviate any privacy or anonymity bitcoin might offer its users.
"In God we Trust" stands in stark contrast to what you're proposing, which is "in computers and software written by other humans we trust."
They're not opposed to it, they made it. You don't seriously think Satoshi Nakamoto is not a spook, do you?
As for why they did that? Every dollar pouring into bitcoins and similar aren't pouring into gold and silver. This means the traditional bellwethers of inflation, gold and silver prices, are staying flatter than they otherwise would, but for BTC+. Knowing a massive hyperinflationary event was coming, they gave you an approved pressure release valve.
It's "The Man Who Was Thursday"-tier shit, anon.
Anyway, if they were opposed to bitcoin adoption, they'd do to it what they did to gold and silver. They'd offer hundreds of bitcoin etc. futures for every bitcoin etc. in existence and sell them as though they're interchangeable with bitcoins etc. This would cause the market to behave as though the supply of BTC+ has expanded, and the price would remain flat despite high demand. Flat prices would discourage further investment and encourage investors to move on to greener pastures, causing sales. And the price would linger for years, decades, until it finally snaps upwards, the response to which would be to pile on more futures contracts and print more money to restore confidence in the scam.
If they didn't want you buying these things, THAT'S what they'd do. Can you think of any things they've done this to?
All right first off all good things come from god. Morse code was invented by a Christian as well as the printing press. Without those inventions we wouldn't have telephones or internet. Everything belongs to god. If you don't think cryptocurrency can be used to further the kingdom and to glorify God then you must not believe in the same God that I do. He works all things together for his glory.
Secondly Bitcoin and crypto was on a strong and steady trajectory upwards until they allowed Wall Street to step in and do options another nonsense like usdt tether.
Why would major financial institutions with strong deep State ties like Black Rock be purchasing billions in crypto?
Why would entire countries like Brazil for example be adopting crypto as legal tender?
The subject isn't something like 256-bit blowfish encryption, the subject is distributed ledger technology. That's a different beast entirely.
And the crypto space still has diapers on. It's becoming more advanced and more secure every year as new technologies are developed.
But I don't think we're going to agree. Time will tell however.
So you admit you don't know what you're talking about. Maybe don't talk about something you don't understand unless it's a question.
The six characteristics of money are durability, portability, acceptability, limited supply, divisibility and uniformity. Money acts as a unit of account, a medium of exchange and a store of value.
Decentralized crypto has all those characteristics better than gold and ALOT better than the cash in your wallet than you can't spend as fast as it's being printed.
Doomer.
Great reply. Decentralized crypto does tick all the boxes for a sound form of money.
If something has a finite supply and can't be replicated it doesn't need to be backed by anything.
The same thing backs crypto that backs gold and every other currency used throughout history... scarcity,
But crypto is better at every characteristic of money at the same time.
You don't understand. You just think you do.
"Continuing to argue about it is a waste of energy."
This is what people that don't know WTF they are talking about say when they need to dip out of a convo they aren't equipped for.