I only have time at the moment to put this together quickly. But pay attention to what more pro-Trump media outlets are saying now compared to MSM. Many of them make phrases that are in-line with Q posts. For example, Newsmax released a segment today on the new Durham revelations regarding Clinton's involvement and the anchor said, "Drip, drip, drip". Pay attention and you'll hear more Q confirmations (Newsmax, OAN, Fox, Epoch Times, etc.).
Meanwhile, in MSM land, in order to reverse the damage that has done to the warped/brainwashed mind, you have to "unwind" this damage by doing it slowly through the very sources who are responsible for propagating these brainwashing techniques in the first place. This inadvertently forces their viewers to be more 'accepting' of the information that is presented to them.
It starts off like this:
Let's use CNN as an example. You run hit pieces on Trump 9/10 times and 1/10 times you put out a story that blasts the DS/Dems/Biden/MSM. After a few months, you run 8/10 hit pieces on Trump and 2/10 that look bad for the DS/Dems/Biden/MSM. This is for pure optics and is a gradual process that must be this way so that it doesn't appear forced or moves too quickly. This process continues until the stories pushed are around 50/50 in terms of optics. Then you present scandals to the public within these MSM organizations (like CNN: Cuomo, Lemon, Zucker, etc) which inadvertently forces their viewers to question the legitimacy & credibility of the SOURCE of their information. Then, it's up to the viewers to come to their own conclusions because there is now great contrast as to what is actually true, what their being told and what they actually believe.
Additionally, once these newly "awakened" viewers begin to witness censorship first-hand by MSM and thru their social media platforms, then there is no way to put the genie back into the bottle. Now you have someone who finally thinks critically and finally begins to question the SOURCE. This is also why Truth Social is so important, but I digress....
Q posts regarding 4am talking points and taking control:
Post #2459:
....
The 'Red Line' months old 4am narrative should be updated.
Pain coming.
Q
Post #561:
MSM is FAKE NEWS.
Propaganda.
Talking points [4am] - private email addresses.
Paid contractors.
JUDGEMENT DAY.
Q
Post #564:
Counter-narrative went out @ 4am to MSM contractors [like clockwork].
Russian bots.
These people are REALLY REALLY STUPID.
....
MSM contractors #Goodbye#
Fight, fight, fight.
Q
Take a look at other Q posts regarding "4am". It gives more reason as to why Q wrote:
News unlocks MAP
Watch the news
We are in control
Backchannels are important.
Information warfare.
Does it all make sense now?
Remember, Q knows MSM connections to FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc: https://qalerts.app/media/815fac8a883a93181848875a1308e7149007f8d271462dcb47374192206934bb.png
Deals were made and they will do as told.
The GREAT AWAKENING :)
Here’s the CNN talking points
CNN narrative
Special counsel Durham alleges Clinton campaign lawyer used data to raise suspicions about Trump - CNNPolitics (archive.ph)
FTA
… The accusation -- which Durham couched in vague, technical language in a court filing late Friday …
… Durham's office said it found nothing to support the allegation….
… Joffe is not charged with any crime, and his lawyer hasn't commented.
… Sussmann has pleaded not guilty to charges of lying to the FBI. His lawyers declined to comment.
… But Durham's court filing doesn't allege that the pro-Clinton researchers use of internet data meant that there was any eavesdropping on content of communications.
… The five-year statute of limitations appears to have passed for Durham to accuse Sussmann of any wrongdoing related to his meeting with the CIA. Passing along information from researchers to intelligence officials for further investigation is not uncommon and isn't necessarily a crime.
No statute of limitations on yreason
We are the government. We'll investigate them.
https://archive.ph/JEyxL