I don’t know, but I reason that Grand Jury members do NOT have to be a “jury of your peers” because they aren’t actually pert of your trial. The Grand Jury can’t convict you, they can only decide that there is enough evidence to indict you. From there, it would go to trial, where you have a chance to defend yourself in front of a “jury or your peers”.
I don’t know, but I reason that Grand Jury members do NOT have to be a “jury of your peers” because they aren’t actually pert of your trial. The Grand Jury can’t convict you, they can only decide that there is enough evidence to indict you. From there, it would go to trial, where you have a chance to defend yourself in front of a “jury or your peers”.
Yes, this makes sense.
Thanks for the reply...I appreciate it.