Remember a while back when we were discussing how they would explain incriminating videos as "deep fakes" as a way to try to persuade people not to believe what their eyes see? Looks like they are setting the normies up for it with their clever little graphic novels.
Yes, I think the first "graphic novel" (it's not), was made before the 2016 election.
Frazzeled.rip was supposedly found on Weiner's "Insurance" folder, and yes, I believe it is, unfortunately, real. Almost all of the NYPD detectives who saw it were crying and puking, and now most are now dead by "suicide"
I also remember after Ed Buck was arrested for his second murder, Schiff reportedly went into a frenzy and ordered his staffers to drop everything and research deepfakes, likely to try to use as a defence of his own disgusting crimes. Tons of video and photos were removed from Bucks house, and his good buddy Schiff probably schiffed himself, they are into the exact same evil stuff (sex with young black men, pumping them full of meth, often until their hearts explode). We have it all, I believe. It's no wonder he's pretty well disappeared after his last failed hoax, hopefully from earth.
Bidan used some very bad deepfakes while "campaigning" from his basement, there was a bad Tom Hanks deepfake on SNL and HRC in her more recent twatter messages, though these were relatively well done. These "comics" do not accurately explain the program, it is machine learning, but not AI. You need a lot of pictures to make a realistic deepfake, you can't have one pic and digitally animate it like this comic book say.
The program needs to be fed with as many pics as possible to learn how the face should move and be able to seamlessly put together a realistic avatar of that person's moving face on another body with enough input (photos). The Bidan ones were obvious fakes, as he used to look completely different, so the program struggled when old Joe pics were used along with current Bidan ones, making it uncanny, his face twistiing in bizarre ways. I've also seen plenty of others presented as real ( most are done for fun.
Most recently Bourla(sp?), the head of Pfizer, did a video interview with his neck glitching out like there were several frogs trying to escape his throat. Rumor has it, he has been arrested, and this video lends credit to that theory.
Microsoft and the BBC started something called Project Origin to validate the authenticity of online media. Out of that sprung The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. I'm not sure how it's going to work, but I'd imagine they'd set themselves up as the judges of what's real or not. From there, they could protect themselves from whatever media is used as proof against them. 🤔
Remember a while back when we were discussing how they would explain incriminating videos as "deep fakes" as a way to try to persuade people not to believe what their eyes see? Looks like they are setting the normies up for it with their clever little graphic novels.
Yes, I think the first "graphic novel" (it's not), was made before the 2016 election.
Frazzeled.rip was supposedly found on Weiner's "Insurance" folder, and yes, I believe it is, unfortunately, real. Almost all of the NYPD detectives who saw it were crying and puking, and now most are now dead by "suicide"
I also remember after Ed Buck was arrested for his second murder, Schiff reportedly went into a frenzy and ordered his staffers to drop everything and research deepfakes, likely to try to use as a defence of his own disgusting crimes. Tons of video and photos were removed from Bucks house, and his good buddy Schiff probably schiffed himself, they are into the exact same evil stuff (sex with young black men, pumping them full of meth, often until their hearts explode). We have it all, I believe. It's no wonder he's pretty well disappeared after his last failed hoax, hopefully from earth.
Bidan used some very bad deepfakes while "campaigning" from his basement, there was a bad Tom Hanks deepfake on SNL and HRC in her more recent twatter messages, though these were relatively well done. These "comics" do not accurately explain the program, it is machine learning, but not AI. You need a lot of pictures to make a realistic deepfake, you can't have one pic and digitally animate it like this comic book say.
The program needs to be fed with as many pics as possible to learn how the face should move and be able to seamlessly put together a realistic avatar of that person's moving face on another body with enough input (photos). The Bidan ones were obvious fakes, as he used to look completely different, so the program struggled when old Joe pics were used along with current Bidan ones, making it uncanny, his face twistiing in bizarre ways. I've also seen plenty of others presented as real ( most are done for fun.
Most recently Bourla(sp?), the head of Pfizer, did a video interview with his neck glitching out like there were several frogs trying to escape his throat. Rumor has it, he has been arrested, and this video lends credit to that theory.
Microsoft and the BBC started something called Project Origin to validate the authenticity of online media. Out of that sprung The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. I'm not sure how it's going to work, but I'd imagine they'd set themselves up as the judges of what's real or not. From there, they could protect themselves from whatever media is used as proof against them. 🤔
https://c2pa.org/
Adobe, Arm (have a monopoly on processors), Intel and [Truepic, a new start-up for verifying the authenticity if photos] (https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/14/microsofts-m12-leads-26m-investment-into-truepic/)are also involved. A Digital Ministry of Truth with a convoluted name that no one will ever remember, crafty bugger(ers)!
No doubt with silent partners FBI/CIA, MI5/6, Mossad etc. It's definitely something the deep state and cabal would be interested in.