And this is just the bare minimum. What are her policies like? Grow a brain people. This post isn't for the majority here because most people around here aren't brainless.
People can disagree with her politics and still appreciate when she, or anyone else on the left, tells the truth.
If Bernie came out tomorrow and said the election was stolen and the Clintons are a family of crime, I would praise him for speaking the truth — but still consider him a fool who doesn’t know the most basic laws of economics.
Only God knows the hearts of men, so we can praise goodness and rebuke evil, regardless from whom it comes.
This is where we disagree. she is not a fool saying wise things.
she's saying very planned things as part of a larger wiser contingency plan. if progressives lose power, she can fill the void as a moderate, and America will be controlled by the banks. if the dems lose power we can try and cram in crenshaw...if not crensaw then. And down the chain of contingency plans.
I think it's worth recognizing and even promoting when a Democrat says something wise, because like you said, it may wake up other Democrats who follow her.
Yes, why analyze or apply critical thinking and character discernment when we can just generalize and dismiss?
I am not convinced that everyone with ties to WEF / Globalists are entirely puppets — that doesn’t make any sense. All organizations, especially nefarious ones like these, operate in degrees. If they didn’t, they would never get the support they have.
Hollywood is one of these fraternities, and yet there are still good, honest people, even conservatives, who have been a part of it and are still a part of it, as well as those who appreciate much of what is produced as a viewer, without knowledge of everything that goes on behind closed doors.
Use your brain: what would a WEF puppet gain by attacking the Clintons? It hasn’t served her well, at all, politically. Only fringe voters know what the clintons are and appreciate her actions against them, so it would not serve to collect majority votes. Instead it served to get her completely dismissed and censored by the media during her last campaign, in a very similar way Ron Paul was dismissed in ‘08 and ‘12, even though he was drawing larger crowds during the primaries than the front runners (esp. in 2012).
More likely, she’s an unintelligent idealist, like Bernie, who believes in dumb things, but still genuinely tries to do the right thing. This of course still makes her dangerous, but it’s foolish to not support speaking truth because it’s coming from someone you don’t like, or because you think they’re using it for some malicious end.
Truth is truth, absolutely, and unequivocally. Any free-thinker KNOWS that it is not who said a thing that is important, but what was said.
Not her specifically, just generally that people with Marxist/globalist/cabal backgrounds or beliefs can actually change. Beliefs are not always static, and I do believe people can wake up.
People tied to organizations and people of interest like her don't just walk away without consequences.
If you are talking about normies. Regular citizens that have been brainwashed by our many institutions sure I can get behind that, There are plenty of examples. If she was truly on our side we would know it. All the evidence points to the opposite.
How many "coincidences" and evidence do we need to condemn her? Like come on.
People can disagree with her politics and still appreciate when she, or anyone else on the left, tells the truth.
If Bernie came out tomorrow and said the election was stolen and the Clintons are a family of crime, I would praise him for speaking the truth — but still consider him a fool who doesn’t know the most basic laws of economics.
Only God knows the hearts of men, so we can praise goodness and rebuke evil, regardless from whom it comes.
Glad you said this, I agree. Fools can still say wise things.
It’s nice to see anyone, even those we have judged as most evil, to speak against the narrative.
Also, someone’s past does not always predict their future. Everyone can wake up, and I hope that they do.
This is where we disagree. she is not a fool saying wise things.
she's saying very planned things as part of a larger wiser contingency plan. if progressives lose power, she can fill the void as a moderate, and America will be controlled by the banks. if the dems lose power we can try and cram in crenshaw...if not crensaw then. And down the chain of contingency plans.
I think it's worth recognizing and even promoting when a Democrat says something wise, because like you said, it may wake up other Democrats who follow her.
Yes, why analyze or apply critical thinking and character discernment when we can just generalize and dismiss?
I am not convinced that everyone with ties to WEF / Globalists are entirely puppets — that doesn’t make any sense. All organizations, especially nefarious ones like these, operate in degrees. If they didn’t, they would never get the support they have.
Hollywood is one of these fraternities, and yet there are still good, honest people, even conservatives, who have been a part of it and are still a part of it, as well as those who appreciate much of what is produced as a viewer, without knowledge of everything that goes on behind closed doors.
Use your brain: what would a WEF puppet gain by attacking the Clintons? It hasn’t served her well, at all, politically. Only fringe voters know what the clintons are and appreciate her actions against them, so it would not serve to collect majority votes. Instead it served to get her completely dismissed and censored by the media during her last campaign, in a very similar way Ron Paul was dismissed in ‘08 and ‘12, even though he was drawing larger crowds during the primaries than the front runners (esp. in 2012).
More likely, she’s an unintelligent idealist, like Bernie, who believes in dumb things, but still genuinely tries to do the right thing. This of course still makes her dangerous, but it’s foolish to not support speaking truth because it’s coming from someone you don’t like, or because you think they’re using it for some malicious end.
Truth is truth, absolutely, and unequivocally. Any free-thinker KNOWS that it is not who said a thing that is important, but what was said.
So you are saying within the last 2 years she has changed her stance on her marxist policies lol? Come on
Not her specifically, just generally that people with Marxist/globalist/cabal backgrounds or beliefs can actually change. Beliefs are not always static, and I do believe people can wake up.
People tied to organizations and people of interest like her don't just walk away without consequences.
If you are talking about normies. Regular citizens that have been brainwashed by our many institutions sure I can get behind that, There are plenty of examples. If she was truly on our side we would know it. All the evidence points to the opposite.
How many "coincidences" and evidence do we need to condemn her? Like come on.
She red-pills?
When has she ever exposed the cabal?