And this is just the bare minimum. What are her policies like? Grow a brain people. This post isn't for the majority here because most people around here aren't brainless.
Yes, why analyze or apply critical thinking and character discernment when we can just generalize and dismiss?
I am not convinced that everyone with ties to WEF / Globalists are entirely puppets — that doesn’t make any sense. All organizations, especially nefarious ones like these, operate in degrees. If they didn’t, they would never get the support they have.
Hollywood is one of these fraternities, and yet there are still good, honest people, even conservatives, who have been a part of it and are still a part of it, as well as those who appreciate much of what is produced as a viewer, without knowledge of everything that goes on behind closed doors.
Use your brain: what would a WEF puppet gain by attacking the Clintons? It hasn’t served her well, at all, politically. Only fringe voters know what the clintons are and appreciate her actions against them, so it would not serve to collect majority votes. Instead it served to get her completely dismissed and censored by the media during her last campaign, in a very similar way Ron Paul was dismissed in ‘08 and ‘12, even though he was drawing larger crowds during the primaries than the front runners (esp. in 2012).
More likely, she’s an unintelligent idealist, like Bernie, who believes in dumb things, but still genuinely tries to do the right thing. This of course still makes her dangerous, but it’s foolish to not support speaking truth because it’s coming from someone you don’t like, or because you think they’re using it for some malicious end.
Truth is truth, absolutely, and unequivocally. Any free-thinker KNOWS that it is not who said a thing that is important, but what was said.
Yes, why analyze or apply critical thinking and character discernment when we can just generalize and dismiss?
I am not convinced that everyone with ties to WEF / Globalists are entirely puppets — that doesn’t make any sense. All organizations, especially nefarious ones like these, operate in degrees. If they didn’t, they would never get the support they have.
Hollywood is one of these fraternities, and yet there are still good, honest people, even conservatives, who have been a part of it and are still a part of it, as well as those who appreciate much of what is produced as a viewer, without knowledge of everything that goes on behind closed doors.
Use your brain: what would a WEF puppet gain by attacking the Clintons? It hasn’t served her well, at all, politically. Only fringe voters know what the clintons are and appreciate her actions against them, so it would not serve to collect majority votes. Instead it served to get her completely dismissed and censored by the media during her last campaign, in a very similar way Ron Paul was dismissed in ‘08 and ‘12, even though he was drawing larger crowds during the primaries than the front runners (esp. in 2012).
More likely, she’s an unintelligent idealist, like Bernie, who believes in dumb things, but still genuinely tries to do the right thing. This of course still makes her dangerous, but it’s foolish to not support speaking truth because it’s coming from someone you don’t like, or because you think they’re using it for some malicious end.
Truth is truth, absolutely, and unequivocally. Any free-thinker KNOWS that it is not who said a thing that is important, but what was said.