Rodney Joffe Was John (NO NAME) McCain's Go-Between
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/2022/02/17/checkered_past_of_fbi_cyber_contractor_who_spied_on_trump_817234.html
Joffe has been a swindling thieving lying criminal since at least the 1980s. Which of course begs the question as to why this shitbird is not in jail.. pretty clearly he was taken under the wing of even greater criminals working for those three-letter-agencies at around that time.
A common fraudster. Shame he was never arrested as a petty crook before graduating to politics. Good article, thanks.
Thanks for sharing this! It's very informative. I find that the Joffe rabbit hole runs pretty deep. This guy seems ripe for an indictment.
I wonder if one reason is that he seems to have a habit of pulling everyone else into his crimes. For example, the Georgia Tech researchers and the staff at Neustar. This guy doesn't just do crime he gets everyone else involved in his crimes. He's kind of a walking disaster for their side.
Welcome, I found this when digging into David Dagon who was another name that come up in conjunction with Sussmann, Joffe, Marc Elias etc but that I hadn't heard before.
Conspiracies are an interesting thing, they need to happen to extend the power of the crime group to more than what any single person can do, but the bigger they get, the more chance that they will fail when one person is the weak link who sells out the rest.. no honor among thieves and all that. Which is counterbalanced of course by the entire group being very bloodthirsty and paranoid about betrayal and 'making examples' of the weak links before they turn and break.. Real game-theory sort of stuff.
So I think there is a 'critically tuned' sort of conspiracy size/footprint, some ideal number that any lower and any higher is suboptimal. Joffe in particular seems like he made a bit of a science out of this.
This caught my eye:
Despite or because of?
That's irony right there. I do notice criminals often brand themselves as the opposite of what they are. If they are child trafficker they run an organization for "saving the kids". If they are a thief they brand themselves as "safe and reliable". Always opposite of what they are.
There has been a sneaky inflection point at sometime over the last couple of years where the most flawed and crooked people have their shady history act as a desirable, rather than a liability. Maybe its the woke-for-pay stuff that Fink and Blackrock are doing, but it was happening in government way before blackrock.
And Prince Andrew is now taking on an anti-childabuse type role
https://greatawakening.win/p/141rVWY5t2/the-elites-have-zero-shame-or-se/c/
Predicable.