Durham to Sussman: “there is no basis to strike any portion of the Government’s Motion,” Durham wrote, adding that the government intends to file motions “in which it will further discuss these and other pertinent facts to explain why they constitute relevant and admissible evidence at trial.”
(resistthemainstream.org)
😷 DEM PANIC 💉
Can someone brief me on Durham's sighting US V Stone in his rebuttal to this?
I'm not familiar with the case and the irony of sighting it.