Friend, you might have to accept that until there is a major flub in the movie you believe is playing, the vast majority of people simply aren't going to see what you do.
People are the Plan, right? People need to be ready to hear the truth without going insane? That's what we're waiting for?
There is not a single theory presented by Q people in the five years I've hung out with you guys that has brought me even remotely close to insanity. Because I'm not as disconnected from how bad the world is as you believe I am.
I know that some celebrities can get away with crimes the rest of us can't. Everyone knows this. We've known this forever. The MeToo movement is specifically in response to this problem.
I know that Epstein probably didn't kill himself, and that he was part of a criminal network of elite pedophiles, and there is likely some conspiracy shit going on with that. I simply don't believe that Trump or Q has anything to do with combatting them in the manner you do.
I've seen videos of ISIS burning people alive and a cartel chopping a woman up alive. People are awful to one another. The notion that people do horrible things to children does not surprise me or challenge my worldview, nor does the horror of knowing these things drive me insane. The world is horrible and I've seen a lot of that horribleness.
This notion that liberals are too fragile to handle the truth about how cruel the world can be is a fiction you tell yourself to feel superior. All those movies you complain about people watching? They include the Saw movies, and the Hostel movies, and movies with graphic rape and child suffering and so forth. People watch these movies to be scared on purpose, sometimes for entertainment, sometimes to expose themselves to an awful reality that is being dramatized (such as Hotel Rwanda).
It's not the horror of the world you propose that would make people panic. Horrifying things have never caused people to panic en masse. People watched gladiator battles FOR FUN. People went to witch-burnings FOR FUN. People watched French nobles get guillontined FOR FUN.
It's UNCERTAINTY that creates panic. And if Q actually has the proof, and the White Hats are actually in control, and there actually is a Plan, then it's complete bollucks that Q needs to wait for people to "wake up" before the Storm.
People don't need to "wake up." They just want to know what the new plan is and why the plan is changing. That's it. You'll have grumbling and angry blogs, but as long as Q's plan means they're safe and supplied, people won't panic just because they learn that some people are horrible. We know. Just show people whatever it is Q has, and they'll be fine as long as the grocery stores are still stocked.
I'm absolutely ready to hear whatever Q has to say and see whatever proof is absolutely 100% convincing of Trump's truth. Anyone who hasn't "woken up" yet doesn't need to. They just need to know what the new plan is. So let's do it, Q.
See, the concept of people you love being in a "Satanic cult" would freak YOU out.
I would find it mildly amusing that apparently intelligent, resourceful people believed in the mystical powers of Satanic sacrifices, when not even mainstream Satanism believes in anything remotely supernatural.
Would I be upset that they murdered children in pursuit of their hilariously-misguided beliefs? Absolutely. As upset as I am that cartels traffic drugs sewn into children and serial killers rape and kill people. I'm not incapable of empathizing with human suffering.
But nothing even you've accused the Cabal of doing is any worse than the things I've seen actual proof of happening. So if the Cabal is doing those things, then that's horrible, and it's also not going to drive anyone insane to know that.
The media-addicted sheeple PAY MONEY to see graphic depictions of crimes FAR WORSE than anything you've accused the Cabal of doing. And oftentimes, it's our beloved celebrities we're watching doing these horrible things on screen. Finding out Christian Bale actually cuts up women is not going to make me vomit in pure confused agony.
I don't "love" celebrities, dude. I enjoy some people's artistic output. But if they're bad people, then fuck them. They should be in jail or whatever consequences is appropriate. It doesn't remotely unsettle me. I enjoyed seeing Kevin Spacey's work in House of Cards, and am totally comfortable with him being blacklisted following his accusations (even though they totally ruined the show's final season as a result).
Your entire concept of liberal fragility regarding "television" and "celebrities" is a straw-man argument you've created to justify the way you need to believe the world is and make yourself feel stronger for believing the things you do.
If there is some video out there of Hillary Clinton sucking adrenochrome directly from the brain of a screaming child, then Q should upload that video right now. I am ready to see it. I don't know if everyone will watch it, but if I watch it and it's verified by Q's real-life exposed credentials as someone I should trust, then I will turn Q believer at this moment, as will everyone else who sees that video. And then we will tell people who can't watch the video what the video is and add our own authority to it, which is all the sheeple need anyway, right?
So let's do it. There is not a single celebrity you could "take from me" that will leave me sleepless. Show me the insanity-inspiring proof and I'll roll the dice that my brain won't melt as a result.
Q is welcome to send such a video directly to me through these forums if he/they'd like. If Q is who you believe, then he/they already know enough about me to know that I'm representing myself fairly here. I'd be happy to begin sharing it myself. And Q would know enough about me to know I'd be an excellent person to convert for many reasons.
If I've abandoned thinking for myself and just blindly obey authority, then all I need is proof that Q is actually an authority and has proof. That's it. Then I'm on the Q train. Blind followers of authority should be the easiest converts if Q is who you believe.
Then Q should have no real problem manipulating me in the other direction with a shocking video proof of Hillary Clinton eating a brain and Q showing their faces as authorities who can credibly claim to have verified the video. I'm apparently very gullible and will believe anything someone with a badge tells me is true, so if Q has one, we're good.
The point of research is literally for smart cookies to do the hard mental legwork and then package their conclusions in a way that makes sense to people who know less about the subject.
Like... that's the point. That's the whole reason research exists.
If you're "researching" just for personal growth, then you aren't researching, you're just learning. Researching is for sharing.
And you seem perpetually upset when people ask you to demonstrate certain basic aspects of your research, such as falsifiability.
No legitimate researcher in history tells people to do their own research. They became researchers to prevent people from having to do that. They have a desire to boil things down for people. That's why they're researchers, and not monks locked away in a temple meditating.
So it's fine if this is the way you want to approach Q, but just note that if you aren't actually willing to share your research, explain your conclusions, defend against peers, and aim to boil it down for those who are less-learned, then please don't call yourself a researcher. Because those are the things researchers do.
Q enthusiast would be fine. Perhaps a fan of Q. A learner of Q. But not a researcher.
Friend, you might have to accept that until there is a major flub in the movie you believe is playing, the vast majority of people simply aren't going to see what you do.
People are the Plan, right? People need to be ready to hear the truth without going insane? That's what we're waiting for?
There is not a single theory presented by Q people in the five years I've hung out with you guys that has brought me even remotely close to insanity. Because I'm not as disconnected from how bad the world is as you believe I am.
I know that some celebrities can get away with crimes the rest of us can't. Everyone knows this. We've known this forever. The MeToo movement is specifically in response to this problem.
I know that Epstein probably didn't kill himself, and that he was part of a criminal network of elite pedophiles, and there is likely some conspiracy shit going on with that. I simply don't believe that Trump or Q has anything to do with combatting them in the manner you do.
I've seen videos of ISIS burning people alive and a cartel chopping a woman up alive. People are awful to one another. The notion that people do horrible things to children does not surprise me or challenge my worldview, nor does the horror of knowing these things drive me insane. The world is horrible and I've seen a lot of that horribleness.
This notion that liberals are too fragile to handle the truth about how cruel the world can be is a fiction you tell yourself to feel superior. All those movies you complain about people watching? They include the Saw movies, and the Hostel movies, and movies with graphic rape and child suffering and so forth. People watch these movies to be scared on purpose, sometimes for entertainment, sometimes to expose themselves to an awful reality that is being dramatized (such as Hotel Rwanda).
It's not the horror of the world you propose that would make people panic. Horrifying things have never caused people to panic en masse. People watched gladiator battles FOR FUN. People went to witch-burnings FOR FUN. People watched French nobles get guillontined FOR FUN.
It's UNCERTAINTY that creates panic. And if Q actually has the proof, and the White Hats are actually in control, and there actually is a Plan, then it's complete bollucks that Q needs to wait for people to "wake up" before the Storm.
People don't need to "wake up." They just want to know what the new plan is and why the plan is changing. That's it. You'll have grumbling and angry blogs, but as long as Q's plan means they're safe and supplied, people won't panic just because they learn that some people are horrible. We know. Just show people whatever it is Q has, and they'll be fine as long as the grocery stores are still stocked.
I'm absolutely ready to hear whatever Q has to say and see whatever proof is absolutely 100% convincing of Trump's truth. Anyone who hasn't "woken up" yet doesn't need to. They just need to know what the new plan is. So let's do it, Q.
See, the concept of people you love being in a "Satanic cult" would freak YOU out.
I would find it mildly amusing that apparently intelligent, resourceful people believed in the mystical powers of Satanic sacrifices, when not even mainstream Satanism believes in anything remotely supernatural.
Would I be upset that they murdered children in pursuit of their hilariously-misguided beliefs? Absolutely. As upset as I am that cartels traffic drugs sewn into children and serial killers rape and kill people. I'm not incapable of empathizing with human suffering.
But nothing even you've accused the Cabal of doing is any worse than the things I've seen actual proof of happening. So if the Cabal is doing those things, then that's horrible, and it's also not going to drive anyone insane to know that.
The media-addicted sheeple PAY MONEY to see graphic depictions of crimes FAR WORSE than anything you've accused the Cabal of doing. And oftentimes, it's our beloved celebrities we're watching doing these horrible things on screen. Finding out Christian Bale actually cuts up women is not going to make me vomit in pure confused agony.
I don't "love" celebrities, dude. I enjoy some people's artistic output. But if they're bad people, then fuck them. They should be in jail or whatever consequences is appropriate. It doesn't remotely unsettle me. I enjoyed seeing Kevin Spacey's work in House of Cards, and am totally comfortable with him being blacklisted following his accusations (even though they totally ruined the show's final season as a result).
Your entire concept of liberal fragility regarding "television" and "celebrities" is a straw-man argument you've created to justify the way you need to believe the world is and make yourself feel stronger for believing the things you do.
If there is some video out there of Hillary Clinton sucking adrenochrome directly from the brain of a screaming child, then Q should upload that video right now. I am ready to see it. I don't know if everyone will watch it, but if I watch it and it's verified by Q's real-life exposed credentials as someone I should trust, then I will turn Q believer at this moment, as will everyone else who sees that video. And then we will tell people who can't watch the video what the video is and add our own authority to it, which is all the sheeple need anyway, right?
So let's do it. There is not a single celebrity you could "take from me" that will leave me sleepless. Show me the insanity-inspiring proof and I'll roll the dice that my brain won't melt as a result.
Q is welcome to send such a video directly to me through these forums if he/they'd like. If Q is who you believe, then he/they already know enough about me to know that I'm representing myself fairly here. I'd be happy to begin sharing it myself. And Q would know enough about me to know I'd be an excellent person to convert for many reasons.
If I've abandoned thinking for myself and just blindly obey authority, then all I need is proof that Q is actually an authority and has proof. That's it. Then I'm on the Q train. Blind followers of authority should be the easiest converts if Q is who you believe.
Then Q should have no real problem manipulating me in the other direction with a shocking video proof of Hillary Clinton eating a brain and Q showing their faces as authorities who can credibly claim to have verified the video. I'm apparently very gullible and will believe anything someone with a badge tells me is true, so if Q has one, we're good.
The point of research is literally for smart cookies to do the hard mental legwork and then package their conclusions in a way that makes sense to people who know less about the subject.
Like... that's the point. That's the whole reason research exists.
If you're "researching" just for personal growth, then you aren't researching, you're just learning. Researching is for sharing.
And you seem perpetually upset when people ask you to demonstrate certain basic aspects of your research, such as falsifiability.
No legitimate researcher in history tells people to do their own research. They became researchers to prevent people from having to do that. They have a desire to boil things down for people. That's why they're researchers, and not monks locked away in a temple meditating.
Uh huh.
So it's fine if this is the way you want to approach Q, but just note that if you aren't actually willing to share your research, explain your conclusions, defend against peers, and aim to boil it down for those who are less-learned, then please don't call yourself a researcher. Because those are the things researchers do.
Q enthusiast would be fine. Perhaps a fan of Q. A learner of Q. But not a researcher.