Don't think so. Down syndrome and a host of other diseases identified as congenital are (for practical purposes) also an evolutionary dead-end, and yet the pro-life movement handles that fairly well.
And gayness isn't genetic, despite the push for it to be thought of that way. Like BRCA, the correlations that have been found can be explained other ways.
What if altering dna for gayness through vaxx is part of the eugenics plan. Since Gay people reproduce less. Unless they are married and livin' on the down-low. Or doing in-vitro or surrogate parenting. Nothing serms too far-fetched these days
I'd guess the flip-flopping will happen on YOUR side, too. My conservative male relatives would rather abort than have a gay or liberal son. the liberal daughter might be allowed, but if she were both gay and liberal..idk
Do you think they think in a rational pragmatic way? Drug fiends can only think about the fastest easiest way of getting what they want in that moment .
Encourages sexual depravity and loose morals, leading to decay of societal values generally. But I think Q posted about the monetary value of aborted fetuses as well.
If it is genetic then abortion only covers potential offspring. Why not just kill the parents that carry the gene? This is gonna get messy. Or would they do a twofer to get more money, kill the baby first and then kill the parents separate? This would also suggest that Heterosexuals are responsible for homosexuality, or that homosexuals pretending to be heterosexuals have kept homosexuality around far longer than it would have lasted if the gays were free to gay, though they are often killed in other places so it's gotta be the breeders, right?
They already flip flopped. We’re on the second flop now.
When I was younger (about the time this article was written) it was their goal to get people to accept gay people. The search for the gay gene was another way of saying “you can’t attack someone for something that isn’t their fault!” Not that most people would have, but boy did they fight over this back then and into the 2000’s. It was basically fought on the nature vs nurture axis.
Once that narrative reached its usefulness (and nobody cared about gay people anymore), the globohomos had to cover up their next goal of making everyone gay. A genetic explanation would no longer explain homosexuality on this widespread of a level. Hence the social construct and spectrum thing where true heterosexuality is now both a myth and the enemy to people under 30.
Neither nature or nurture can explain this level of degeneracy, only social engineering and agenda, imo.
Right? I remember the argument for gay people being “it’s not their choice”
Now literally everyone thinks that you can “choose” to change your gender or sexuality based on daily whims. At first I found this odd, since it seemed like some sort of bizarre appropriation of gay and trans culture… but it turns out this big cluster fuck orgy is what they wanted all along.
I’ll never forget this gay guy I knew who tried to seduce me one day. He made some comment like “oh come on, every man’s a six pack away from a dick in his mouth” and I booed the fuck out of there. I couldn’t shake the thought, though, that here he was saying sexuality was a choice! That struck me as backwards of the narrative I was taught (genetic).
Never hung out with him again and he got fired for sexually assaulting people a few years later.
Don't think so. Down syndrome and a host of other diseases identified as congenital are (for practical purposes) also an evolutionary dead-end, and yet the pro-life movement handles that fairly well.
And gayness isn't genetic, despite the push for it to be thought of that way. Like BRCA, the correlations that have been found can be explained other ways.
What if altering dna for gayness through vaxx is part of the eugenics plan. Since Gay people reproduce less. Unless they are married and livin' on the down-low. Or doing in-vitro or surrogate parenting. Nothing serms too far-fetched these days
I like your theory, but I think they’re doing it with parasitic infections not DNA alteration.
LOL National Cancer Institute=money laundering with taxdollars
"Parasidic infection"
I'd guess the flip-flopping will happen on YOUR side, too. My conservative male relatives would rather abort than have a gay or liberal son. the liberal daughter might be allowed, but if she were both gay and liberal..idk
Child sacrifice
Do you think they think in a rational pragmatic way? Drug fiends can only think about the fastest easiest way of getting what they want in that moment .
Encourages sexual depravity and loose morals, leading to decay of societal values generally. But I think Q posted about the monetary value of aborted fetuses as well.
Yes that has crossed my mind too
If it is genetic then abortion only covers potential offspring. Why not just kill the parents that carry the gene? This is gonna get messy. Or would they do a twofer to get more money, kill the baby first and then kill the parents separate? This would also suggest that Heterosexuals are responsible for homosexuality, or that homosexuals pretending to be heterosexuals have kept homosexuality around far longer than it would have lasted if the gays were free to gay, though they are often killed in other places so it's gotta be the breeders, right?
They already flip flopped. We’re on the second flop now.
When I was younger (about the time this article was written) it was their goal to get people to accept gay people. The search for the gay gene was another way of saying “you can’t attack someone for something that isn’t their fault!” Not that most people would have, but boy did they fight over this back then and into the 2000’s. It was basically fought on the nature vs nurture axis.
Once that narrative reached its usefulness (and nobody cared about gay people anymore), the globohomos had to cover up their next goal of making everyone gay. A genetic explanation would no longer explain homosexuality on this widespread of a level. Hence the social construct and spectrum thing where true heterosexuality is now both a myth and the enemy to people under 30.
Neither nature or nurture can explain this level of degeneracy, only social engineering and agenda, imo.
Right? I remember the argument for gay people being “it’s not their choice”
Now literally everyone thinks that you can “choose” to change your gender or sexuality based on daily whims. At first I found this odd, since it seemed like some sort of bizarre appropriation of gay and trans culture… but it turns out this big cluster fuck orgy is what they wanted all along.
I’ll never forget this gay guy I knew who tried to seduce me one day. He made some comment like “oh come on, every man’s a six pack away from a dick in his mouth” and I booed the fuck out of there. I couldn’t shake the thought, though, that here he was saying sexuality was a choice! That struck me as backwards of the narrative I was taught (genetic).
Never hung out with him again and he got fired for sexually assaulting people a few years later.