oh, boy. Yup. 100%!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
How does a pro demolition work. They start a the bottom with the supports, yes? You're ignoring the video evidence of a fire under the penthouse of building 7.
Building 7
Look closely at the top left of 7. That's the penthouse. Notice how it collapses? And if you play the video slowly, you can spot the left side giving way before the right side. As you say, its not designed like the others, therefore it does depend on its inner support structure, which the penthouse has just fallen through.
Secondly, explain the damage here. 7 is the building in the upper left just in front of the white building at the top. that doesn't look symmetrical if that white building has been damaged. Barclay St. that same white building is now on the left. Kind of sloppy for a pro demo job.
Its not nearly as simple as starting fires at the bottom... wow... its a very very precisely times set of explosions, they also CUT each of the beams at an angle and the locations and timing of all of it is critical. A fire has never in history collapsed a steel building before that day. No steel building have ever defied the law that things topple without a controlled demolition, that day we are suppose to believe 3 did. 2 identical building and 1 completely different. 2 by airplane and 1 by fire.
No other building, to my knowledge, has ever been hit by something the size of a fully loaded 737 at speed either.
Steel retains much of its strength up until around 600 degrees. From there it gradually loses strength, where at 1100 degrees it's strength is roughly halved. This doesn't take into account the quality of the steel either. The chemical impurities. You will see a skeletonized building after a fire, assuming its supporting structure is intact, that's not in dispute. But that's not the case here.
You're overlooking the weight above, still pressing down on the weakend area. The outer columns of 7 nearest the towers were hit by debris, causing a weakening. That debris was on fire. You can find video of 7 almost fully engulfed in smoke on the back side from that view in the video, which suggests it wasn't a small fire, and that the building was damaged enough to fall in an asymmetrical way that its debris fell across Barclay st, and struck the white building behind it. You can listen to the firefighter audio about trying to put the fires out, but losing water pressure. And the penthouse was the catalyst for the collapse. Unless you're suggesting the FDNY was in on the plan too?
Again, there was still a number of floors and the massive 6ft thick solid concrete and steel roof of the towers that weakend support structure had to contend with. A fire doesn't have to melt beams, just weaken it enough that the weight above and gravity will do the rest. "Melting steel beams" is an oversimplification to overlook all the physics involved. Your thermite is comprised of iron oxide, in the form of the building's materials, and aluminum, in the form of a jet liner. And we haven't even fully touched on the resulting explosive reaction of water meeting molten aluminum.
The theory that teams of people coordinated to precisely plant thermite charges and cut beams, all while avoiding the firefighters and police in the area is hard to swallow. Harder still if it's suggested that the FDNY and NYPD were all involved too. The amount of people that would have been involved is staggering. I think its simply easier to state that the attacks were allowed to happen. The imagery alone, before the towers fell, was enough to get what they wanted. Whether the towers fell or not wouldn't make much difference. A surprise attack, people jumping out of those windows. It's enough to get people riled up or scared or both. Far easier too, given you'd have less people to contend with in the blackmailing and threatening.