68,000% Increase in Strokes as FDA and NIH Secretly Study Reports of Neurological Injuries After COVID-19 Vaccines. The COVID-19 experimental vaccines, which were given emergency use authorization illegally, should have been immediately pulled from the market at least a year ago.
(vaccineimpact.com)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
This is exactly how NOT to do science. VAERS is a total horror show of a database. It's incomplete. Reporting is not mandatory or standardized in anyway. Both medical professionals and the general public can submit claims. There's little to no verification of claims. And a long litany of studies have shown it's only capturing a tiny fraction of overall data.
It cannot be used to infer the incidence of disease at all.
Let me say that again because that's the entirety of what this article does. You cannot use VAERS data to infer the incidence of any side effect because the data are wholly insufficient.
If you want to calculate incidence of a disease, there's a process to do it in a validated way. This isn't it. While I have no doubt that the vaccines are causing something, we cannot know how much from this data set.
While VAERS may be insufficient for a fully vetted professional conclusion, I see it as a significant piece of data considering people would be less inclined to register incidents this past year compared to 30y+ (whether it be due to work overload or political pressure to protect the narrative) and even then results in a huge gap as demonstrated by babskek's comment.
Fascinating how people dismiss VAERS, when it's literally the ONLY vaccine safety system established in the US.
If you ignore VAERS, what then are you using to establish vaccine safety signals?
It's certainly not perfect, but ignore it at your own peril.
Experts! We should only listen to Experts!
#TrustFauci /s
While there are some inefficiencies, it is illegal to make a false or knowingly inaccurate submission in VAERS. While some pieces may be incomplete, it has been the gold standard for tracking vaccine side-effects up until the Covid vaccine. So I guess all of the other data we've been relying on for the previous 30 years is also unreliable? I think that once the general public caught wind of VAERS and used it as evidence that something was awry with the jab, the medical industrial complex did everything they could to demean the system in order to discourage vaccine hesitancy, even though it has been the go-to for most, if not all vaccines for decades.
Then use the ONS vaccine injury data which is validated? Interesting the VAERS data corresponds to ONS vaccine injury data.
I’m feeling pretty dumb for not knowing about the ONS database. Can you point me ?