Truth Social Is A Place To Exchange Information ("E" comms?)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
u/dty6 u/lonewulf u/sleepydude
HOW THE COMMS AWARE TRAIN THEIR KIDS
I wanted to discuss how they pass it to their kids. For us, learning comms is like trying to learn to read a book written in Navajo and none of us speak Navajo. We are trying to guess the meaning and decipher by trying to figure out patterns. It's not like that for the comms aware. They are fluent and they know how to pass it down in a way their kids can figure out.
Look at Da Vinci Code for how fast a truly comms aware can break ciphers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iTgT-ExreQ
National Treasure shows how the comms aware see the world. This is a history of creating ciphers like the pig pen cipher:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-413tlhPDZo
The Founding Fathers were all fluent in ciphers. They knew CODE very well. Of course the Constitution and many of the documents they wrote would be full of double meanings. They invented cipher devices.
I already shared this with sleepydude, but I thought this is a great example of how these families pass the art of "codebreaking" down to their kids:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Brown
They make it a "game" and then they observe which of their children is the best at the game. The kids learn to become hyper aware of symbolism. The world becomes one giant hunt for the Easter Eggs hidden in everything. It must be exciting for the comms aware child to realize there are all these secret messages going around that only they can see.
As the comms aware child grows up they go to certain colleges and find certain professors who are also comms aware. If they have a teacher who is comms aware then world literature is a very different experience for them than the other kids sleeping through the class.
Shakespeare (if he was even a real person) has works full of comms. I always wondered why Shakespeare was pushed and I realize it a rich territory for comms. Many of the words are very unique. You can use a phrase but disguise it as a quote.
By the time the comms aware is finished with college they a fluent in complicated symbolic language. They can decide an article within minutes of looking at it. They are trained to watch for anagrams and world puzzles.
Movies and books without ciphers are boring to them. Many comms-aware can even enjoy stories just for the stories. They have been trained for pattern recognition to the point that they can't see anything else.
Trump is a rare example of someone who is comms aware but can see the big picture. When you read his tweets he was always speaking in comms. It was back and forth with the DS. Trump is fluent in comms. His kids likely have some of it as well.
The wealthy and powerful always needed ways to converse among each other without getting caught. Training your kid to talk in comms is about survival. If they don't learn it you will lose everything.
u/dty6 u/sleepydude
Yes, I did see the above post. I read "The DaVinci Code" and was able to visit some of the places mentioned in it. I saw the "Virgin of the Rocks" painting in the Louvre. It's not as bright as photographs would lead you to believe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_of_the_Rocks
I also got to see Saint-Sulpice, too, which was pretty cool. I had to laugh while I was there. They had a poster on the wall, basically disavowing the whole DaVinci Code thing. They were still most happy to accept a donation, however. Kek!
I found the train station mentioned in the book and took some photos of it, too.
At another time, I got to see Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland. I was super lucky in that they were doing repair work to the roof at the time. They had scaffolding the entire way around the Chapel and you could go up and see the roof up close and personal. It was sort of a once-in-a-lifetime thing. There's actually a stone beehive up there. The only downside was they were also doing some work inside the chapel, so there was a part of the ceiling that I was unable to view.
To the right of the altar there are stairs that go down to the room that has the diagrams etched into the stone that are mentioned in the book.
It's too bad you guys can't see my photos from all of these places. I took a ton of them. It's been a long time since I read the book, but I may have visited other places that were referenced in it, too. I was all over Paris.
I got to see a lot of Edinburgh, Scotland, too. I saw the coffee shop where J.K. Rowling supposedly wrote Harry Potter and the cemetery nearby where she got some of the names for the characters, like Mrs. McGonagall. Took a tour of the Queen's Holyrood Castle, too. That was pretty cool.
That sounds like an amazing trip. Can you put the photos on Imgur?
This is sorta distressing. I always assumed the treasure hunts at family gatherings were simply a holdover from the days before TV and a means to keep the kids of my generation occupied while the adults partied it up. But perhaps I'm actually a comms training dropout. That would certainly explain the Von Daniken books the older generation seemed to like...
Oh well, at least now I can feel better about my current struggles with the comms since apparently I was never any good at it.
No, that would be getting absurd. Most treasure hunts are just treasure hunts. I doubt you were being "comms trained". If you were then I doubt you'd be posting here about it and symbolism talk (even if you didn't succeed) would make a lot more sense. You'd be more advanced at it than any of us. Light bulbs would go off as you saw it.
We're talking about a different level. Were you asked to figure out complex ciphers, anagrams and complex codes? If not, then I doubt you were being trained in decoding. For you and most kids it was just easy scavenger hunts and word puzzles. What Dan Brown describes is on another level.
Remember 95% of the world population (probably higher) is not comms aware.
Most children are just having treasure hunts. Most people just go through the world without a clue. I doubt any treasure hunts you did were anything more than just innocent fun. You'd have to have at least one parent who was good at it enough to train you. Did you have a parent who was good at breaking code and interpreting symbolism? If not, then you were just playing a kid's game and nothing more.