The magic world doesn’t rule over the muggles; not even in secret.
Keep in mind they have memory-wiping charms and it's the highest of crimes to do magic before muggles.
There's a whole backlore talking about how after Merlin they realized the muggles couldn't handle knowing magic existed and that they would realize they were powerless compared to magic users. In her lore, muggles rebelled and hunted wizards and witches as a "we must kill them before they kill us" mentality. She hints that the Salem Witch Trials were the turning point where the magic world realized it wasn't working.
Wizards and witches went into hiding, having concluded that the magic world and the muggle world don't mix.
The antagonist, Grindelwald, wants the magic world to announce itself to the muggles and let the pieces fall where they may to prevent a world war that the muggles were going to do to themselves. He argued that the only way to prevent muggles from destroying themselves is to use a heavy hand and no longer just hide and let them do as they will. He was predicting WW2 (the movies take place in the early 1900s) and wanted to prevent it by being the top of the pyramid of the muggle power structures.
The takeaway is that after Grindelwald and WW2, the magic world did just what he wanted, though under the table. The Ministry of Truth became more heavy handed in its efforts to control the muggle world. Leading into the original series, which is set starting in the mid to late 1990's, we see that magic people do in fact have carte blanch control over the muggles and the integration of the two was complete. Magic users and muggles lived together and could have offspring -- mudbloods.
On the premise of "racial" relations, Voldemort came to power with a similar plan as Grindelwald, but based on a seething hatred for muggles. Instead of just ruling over them, he sought to slaughter all muggles but the ones deemed useful.
Anyway, there's a lot here but it isn't entirely on Q, at least for the unaware.
The point is that JK Rowling isn't a globo-homo stooge. She is certainly Cabal, but she is fighting to return to how things "used to be" where the secret societies controlled media and politics, but all these global war-games and centralized commerce systems would fade away as the crazy fantasies that they really are.
On the topic of JK, I did wonder if she was “activated” when it came to the topic of trannies. White hats do seem to place heavy emphasis on culture war.
I think she honestly rebelled on the tranny ideas.
She got pushback on her second Fantastic Beasts film as well, with bad reviews stemming from her TERF views and the use of Johnny Depp as the antagonist in light of his quarrel with Amber Heard, who is a psychotic bitch, apparently.
JK Rowling is a sincere hardcore feminist. That means she refuses the idea that men can appropriate femininity. It's the most obvious explanation.
You have to understand that trannies can never work, and the Cabal knows that. They realize it is self-destructive behavior and that's why they are supporting it -- because they want the ruin of Western civilization. A gender crisis is the most cost-effective way to ruin a culture, because it prevents reproduction and encourages medical dependence. Two birds, one stone.
They want to sterilize people both in body and mind. Even feminists are effectively sterile, which I doubt JK Rowling is willing to admit. 50% or so women under the age of 30 have not yet had a single child. This statistic has never been this bad in the history of human reproduction standards, and it's not just birth control measures that is responsible.
The more you push the gender/sex question, the more you discourage reproduction. When a tribe stops making young people, the tribe will die under the weight of its large number of useless old people.
It is possible she was activated by the Cabal to take the stance she does, but seeing how it has only hurt her financially and publicly, I doubt that. It's more likely that she realizes that she falls on the NWO's chopping block for useless eaters and is, surprisingly, standing on her principles, as flawed they may be.
Keep in mind they have memory-wiping charms and it's the highest of crimes to do magic before muggles.
There's a whole backlore talking about how after Merlin they realized the muggles couldn't handle knowing magic existed and that they would realize they were powerless compared to magic users. In her lore, muggles rebelled and hunted wizards and witches as a "we must kill them before they kill us" mentality. She hints that the Salem Witch Trials were the turning point where the magic world realized it wasn't working.
Wizards and witches went into hiding, having concluded that the magic world and the muggle world don't mix.
JK Rowling tried to expound on this ideal, that the two don't mix, in her newer novels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizarding_World#Fantastic_Beasts_films
The antagonist, Grindelwald, wants the magic world to announce itself to the muggles and let the pieces fall where they may to prevent a world war that the muggles were going to do to themselves. He argued that the only way to prevent muggles from destroying themselves is to use a heavy hand and no longer just hide and let them do as they will. He was predicting WW2 (the movies take place in the early 1900s) and wanted to prevent it by being the top of the pyramid of the muggle power structures.
The takeaway is that after Grindelwald and WW2, the magic world did just what he wanted, though under the table. The Ministry of Truth became more heavy handed in its efforts to control the muggle world. Leading into the original series, which is set starting in the mid to late 1990's, we see that magic people do in fact have carte blanch control over the muggles and the integration of the two was complete. Magic users and muggles lived together and could have offspring -- mudbloods.
On the premise of "racial" relations, Voldemort came to power with a similar plan as Grindelwald, but based on a seething hatred for muggles. Instead of just ruling over them, he sought to slaughter all muggles but the ones deemed useful.
Anyway, there's a lot here but it isn't entirely on Q, at least for the unaware.
The point is that JK Rowling isn't a globo-homo stooge. She is certainly Cabal, but she is fighting to return to how things "used to be" where the secret societies controlled media and politics, but all these global war-games and centralized commerce systems would fade away as the crazy fantasies that they really are.
Good shit. I defer to your knowledge of the lore.
On the topic of JK, I did wonder if she was “activated” when it came to the topic of trannies. White hats do seem to place heavy emphasis on culture war.
I think she honestly rebelled on the tranny ideas.
She got pushback on her second Fantastic Beasts film as well, with bad reviews stemming from her TERF views and the use of Johnny Depp as the antagonist in light of his quarrel with Amber Heard, who is a psychotic bitch, apparently.
JK Rowling is a sincere hardcore feminist. That means she refuses the idea that men can appropriate femininity. It's the most obvious explanation.
You have to understand that trannies can never work, and the Cabal knows that. They realize it is self-destructive behavior and that's why they are supporting it -- because they want the ruin of Western civilization. A gender crisis is the most cost-effective way to ruin a culture, because it prevents reproduction and encourages medical dependence. Two birds, one stone.
They want to sterilize people both in body and mind. Even feminists are effectively sterile, which I doubt JK Rowling is willing to admit. 50% or so women under the age of 30 have not yet had a single child. This statistic has never been this bad in the history of human reproduction standards, and it's not just birth control measures that is responsible.
The more you push the gender/sex question, the more you discourage reproduction. When a tribe stops making young people, the tribe will die under the weight of its large number of useless old people.
It is possible she was activated by the Cabal to take the stance she does, but seeing how it has only hurt her financially and publicly, I doubt that. It's more likely that she realizes that she falls on the NWO's chopping block for useless eaters and is, surprisingly, standing on her principles, as flawed they may be.
I was suggesting she was activated by white hats actually. Due to the importance of the cultural battle you laid out.
Ah, I see. It's possible.