First of all lets call it 1000mph. Much closer to speed near equator.
What would be the problem with a zero wind day?
Since wind is not generated by spin, (do we both agree?) the real cause of wind would have to stop also. So no sun, no ocean currents, no heat transfer of any kind.
I've told you that I can't work out (i.e. physics) how the equator can have air moving at 1000mph and the pole can have air moving at 0mph without there being a constant current of air between the two.
Try this. Spin a snow globe at a constant speed. Do you have a turn table? At some point the snow will settle (equilibrium , zero wind). At that point look down into the globe from the top. The snow near the center (analogous to north pole) will be hardly moving at all. While the snow at the sides (anagous to the equator) will be spinning quite fast. Even though the snow is not moving relative to the snow globe, from outside that inertial reference point you can tell is is moving quite fast.
First of all lets call it 1000mph. Much closer to speed near equator.
What would be the problem with a zero wind day?
Since wind is not generated by spin, (do we both agree?) the real cause of wind would have to stop also. So no sun, no ocean currents, no heat transfer of any kind.
Sorry, yes, 1000mph is more like it.
I'm not sure what you are really asking me.
I've told you that I can't work out (i.e. physics) how the equator can have air moving at 1000mph and the pole can have air moving at 0mph without there being a constant current of air between the two.
Try this. Spin a snow globe at a constant speed. Do you have a turn table? At some point the snow will settle (equilibrium , zero wind). At that point look down into the globe from the top. The snow near the center (analogous to north pole) will be hardly moving at all. While the snow at the sides (anagous to the equator) will be spinning quite fast. Even though the snow is not moving relative to the snow globe, from outside that inertial reference point you can tell is is moving quite fast.